2 most common phases of malware analysis

Headline

Static analysis involves examining the malware’s code, binaries, and metadata without executing the malware. This phase focuses on understanding the structure and potential functionality of the malware through various techniques such as disassembly and decompilation. Key aspects…

Context

Static analysis involves examining the malware’s code, binaries, and metadata without executing the malware. This phase focuses on understanding the structure and potential functionality of the malware through various techniques such as disassembly and decompilation. There are some key aspects of static analysis:

Evidence

Pending intelligence enrichment.

Analysis

Code review : Analysts inspect the malware’s code to identify patterns, strings, and commands that reveal its intended functionality. Tools like disassemblers and decompilers are used to convert the malware’s binary code into a human-readable format, aiding in the identification of its components and possible behaviours. Signature creation : By examining the code, analysts can create signatures or heuristics that help detect the malware in future instances. These signatures are used by antivirus and intrusion detection systems to identify and block the same or similar threats. Obfuscation detection : Static analysis can reveal obfuscation techniques used by malware authors to hide malicious code. Identifying these techniques helps in understanding how the malware tries to evade detection. Also read: 3 main differences between static and dynamic malware analysis

Key Points

• The two most common phases of malware analysis are static analysis and dynamic analysis.
• Each phase plays a crucial role in understanding and mitigating the threat posed by malware.

Related

Pending intelligence enrichment.

Actions

Pending intelligence enrichment.

Author

Zoey Zhu