LACNIC · RIR Watchdog
LACNIC
Start with Policy for a plain-language record of what changed, who argued for what, how the decision evolved, and where the evidence has gaps. Story adds BTW reporting and context.
Participation concentration
Who actually shaped this RIR?
Discussion statistics are still being updated. Figures shown reflect the records processed so far.
Open a linked profile to follow that person or organisation across policies, messages and changing positions. Every figure remains tied to the stated source coverage.
Recurring people and organisations
- Jordi Palet Martinez40 Policies participated · 79 Discussion messages
- RICARDO PATARA27 Policies participated · 68 Discussion messages
- Nicolas Antoniello26 Policies participated · 53 Discussion messages
- Gianina Pensky24 Policies participated · 101 Discussion messages
- Juan Alejo Peirano24 Policies participated · 83 Discussion messages
- Unknown21 Policies participated · 45 Discussion messages
- Paola Perez18 Policies participated · 40 Discussion messages
- Carlos Plasencia18 Policies participated · 35 Discussion messages
- Alex Ojeda12 Policies participated · 20 Discussion messages
- Sergio Rojas. . .12 Policies participated · 18 Discussion messages
Policy records
Start with Policy- LAC-2026-4
Justification of Need for Inter-RIR Transfers
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 15, 2026 · Latest activity: Oct 14, 20261Policy versions6Discussion messages5Total participants4.5Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2026-3
Require Valid ROA Coverage for Requesting Additional Resources
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Aug 12, 2026 · Latest activity: Oct 14, 20262Policy versions4Discussion messages5Total participants4Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2026-6
Clarifications to the PDP
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 25, 2026 · Latest activity: Oct 14, 20261Discussion messages1Total participants1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2026-5
Recovery of Unjustified Legacy Resources
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 16, 2026 · Latest activity: Oct 14, 20261Policy versions1Discussion messages1Total participants1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2025-5
Sub-Assignment of IPv4 Resources to Third Parties
Accepted · Official status: Ratified
Introduced: Dec 1, 2025 · Latest activity: Oct 14, 20262Policy versions1Discussion messages5Total participants1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share
Latest stories
Open Story
Story
LACNIC and REGULATEL Formalize Cooperation on Internet Governance
The memorandum links a regional Internet number registry with a forum of telecom regulators. Its test is whether shared priorities become accountable work while each institution keeps its own remit.
Story
The Link Is Not the Block: Testing LACNIC’s Sub-Assignment Rule
LACNIC’s September policy-list exchange began with a small portal question and ended at a more consequential one: when an internet service provider sells a dedicated connection, has it also given the customer an IPv4 resource? The public record describes the service, but leaves…
Story
Digitel’s IPv6 Transition Had a Second Clock in Its Records
Venezuela’s IPv6 rule measures a network’s ability to carry the protocol. Digitel’s account points to a separate test: whether its subscriber records could identify the address used at a particular time. The public evidence does not show that the rule prescribed a CDR field.
Story
LACNIC links an operator’s ASN to the freedom to change providers
LACNIC links an operator’s ASN to the freedom to change providers intelligence summary explains the development, the public evidence available to readers, the organisations involved, the regional context, market exposure, and the infrastructure consequences that may follow. The…