LACNIC · RIR Watchdog
LACNIC
Start with Policy for a plain-language record of what changed, who argued for what, how the decision evolved, and where the evidence has gaps. Story adds BTW reporting and context.
Participation concentration
Who actually shaped this RIR?
Discussion statistics are still being updated. Figures shown reflect the records processed so far.
Open a linked profile to follow that person or organisation across policies, messages and changing positions. Every figure remains tied to the stated source coverage.
Recurring people and organisations
- Jordi Palet Martinez38 Policies participated · 76 Discussion messages
- RICARDO PATARA26 Policies participated · 67 Discussion messages
- Nicolas Antoniello25 Policies participated · 53 Discussion messages
- Gianina Pensky24 Policies participated · 101 Discussion messages
- Juan Alejo Peirano24 Policies participated · 83 Discussion messages
- Unknown20 Policies participated · 44 Discussion messages
- Paola Perez18 Policies participated · 40 Discussion messages
- Carlos Plasencia18 Policies participated · 35 Discussion messages
- Alex Ojeda12 Policies participated · 20 Discussion messages
- Sergio Rojas. . .12 Policies participated · 18 Discussion messages
Policy records
Start with Policy- LAC-2026-6
Aclaraciones del PDP
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 25, 2026 · Latest activity: Sep 25, 2026Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2026-5
Recovery of Unjustified Legacy Resources
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 16, 2026 · Latest activity: Sep 16, 2026Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2026-4
Justification of Need for Inter-RIR Transfers
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Sep 15, 2026 · Latest activity: Sep 15, 2026Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2023-4
Legacy Resources Management
Rejected · Official status: Did not reach consensus
Introduced: Jun 30, 2026 · Latest activity: Aug 29, 20268Policy versions1Total participants - LAC-2026-3
Require Valid ROA Coverage for Requesting Additional Resources
Under discussion · Official status: Under discussion
Introduced: Aug 12, 2026 · Latest activity: Aug 12, 20262Policy versions1Discussion messages2Total participants1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share
Latest stories
Open Story
Story
LACNIC Warned About Attendee-Database Emails. That Is Not Yet a Breach Notice.
A sales pitch can prove that somebody was targeted. It cannot, by itself, prove how the sender found the target. LACNIC's warning about emails offering attendee databases is useful precisely because it stops at that boundary. The next useful step is to make the changing evidence…
Story
LACNIC's PDP Draft Asks Which Version Receives Consensus
LACNIC's PDP Draft Asks Which Version Receives Consensus intelligence summary explains the development, the public evidence available to readers, the organisations involved, the regional context, market exposure, and the infrastructure consequences that may follow. The Story…
Story
LACNIC’s XARF Guide Counts Seven Required Fields. The Specification Lists Eight
The missing item is `sender`, the field that separates the complainant from the organization transmitting the report. A validator must name the schema it enforced before “valid” can become operational evidence.
Story
LACNIC's ASN-Only Label Is Not a Test of Network Use
LACNIC's ASN-Only Label Is Not a Test of Network Use intelligence summary explains the development, the public evidence available to readers, the organisations involved, the regional context, market exposure, and the infrastructure consequences that may follow. The Story…