Artists sue google for alleged AI image copyright infringement

Artists sue google for alleged AI image copyright infringement is profiled by BTW Media because published evidence links it to internet infrastructure, governance, operational dependencies, or market visibility.

• A group of artists has filed a class action against Google alleging its Imagen AI model was trained on their works without permission.
• The lawsuit claims the text-to-image model is an “infringing derivative work” as it contains copies of their images that were reproduced “multiple times.”
• The artists allege Google conducted “massive copyright infringement” through its Imagen model and demand damages based on the company’s “wrongful conduct.”

Artists file class action against Google, claiming its Imagen AI model was trained on their works without permission. The images in question are alleged to have been used to train other Google AI models, including Imagen 2 and multimodal systems like Gemini.

Also read: Google incorporates cybersecurity into AI plan

Artists complain about Google repeatedly violates their rights

The complaint said: “[The] plaintiffs never authorised Google to use their copyrighted work in any way. Nevertheless, Google repeatedly violated plaintiffs’ exclusive rights… and continues to do so today.”

Google launched Imagen in May 2022 when text-to-image models like Stable Diffusion and Midjourney first began to emerge. Imagen 2 would debut the following December.

The image generation model was embedded into Google Cloud platforms like Vertex, enabling users to generate images for business needs. It would also be used as the underlying image generator for generative 3D models like Google DreamFusion.

Also read: Google Cloud and NetApp introduce enhanced data storage

Problem lies in LAION Models

Among the datasets used to develop Imagen was LAION-400M, an open source corpus containing URLs to images for model training.

The artists claim their work appeared in that dataset and since Google copied LAION-400M to build its own AI systems, the company in effect created copies of their work without permission.

“The intermediate copies of each copyrighted work that Google made during training of the Google LAION Models were substantially similar to that copyrighted work,” the lawsuit says. “[The] plaintiffs have been injured by Google’s acts of direct copyright infringement.”

The artists have demanded that Google destroy all reproduced copies of their work and that the company pay their legal costs.