AFRINIC
AFRINIC’s proxy vote scandal: What went wrong?
AFRINIC’s election annulment reveals governance instability, raising serious concerns over transparency and regional internet stewardship.
Headline
AFRINIC’s election annulment reveals governance instability, raising serious concerns over transparency and regional internet stewardship.
Context
In June 2025, AFRINIC abruptly suspended its board elections after discovering a single proxy vote flagged as unverified—despite hundreds of other legitimate votes already cast via proxies. Instead of isolating the disputed vote, the election was cancelled entirely. This extreme decision sparked outrage, especially from small ISPs whose votes were submitted through proxy agents. Reports indicate that many members never had a chance to cast their proxies before voting stopped, effectively disenfranchising a significant portion of the membership base. The mass cancellation—over 800 proxy ballots deemed valid by proxy agents—represented a disproportionate remedy. Critics argue AFRINIC could have invalidated only the suspicious ballot while allowing the election to continue. Instead, the registry’s leadership opted for a total annulment, eroding confidence in its governance and increasing calls for institutional reform.
Evidence
Pending intelligence enrichment.
Analysis
Also read: Cloud Innovation supports ICANN’s move to derecognise AFRINIC, calls for successor to be immediately identified Also read: Who is Eddy Kayihura? The scandalous past of AFRINIC’s former CEO Proxy voting is essential for AFRINIC’s geographically dispersed membership. It allows small and remote ISPs to participate in governance without being physically present. In the 2025 election, proxy agents such as Number Resource Limited presented notarized and apostilled Powers of Attorney on behalf of clients. The registry recorded vote submission metadata, yet key votes were not counted before suspension . Despite being procedurally valid, many proxy ballots were discarded or rendered void by the cancellation. The impact was disproportionate: remote members lost representation, and campaigns were disrupted. Cloud Innovation and others highlighted how this action undermined the principle of bottom-up internet governance, in which every member’s voice should count equal. ICANN reacted to the debacle by seeking judicial orders guaranteeing election transparency. Its June notice pushed for the reconstitution of AFRINIC’s Nomination Committee, fair member notification, and clear election mechanisms. A court ruling soon followed, ordering the Receiver to issue a formal communique and comply with election integrity standards.
Key Points
- AFRINIC suspended its 2025 board election over a single disputed proxy, invalidating hundreds of legitimate votes.
- The disproportionate response eroded trust in AFRINIC’s governance and drew scrutiny from ICANN and the courts .
Actions
Pending intelligence enrichment.
