AFRINIC’s chaotic election sparks calls for reform

AFRINIC’s chaotic election sparks calls for reform is profiled by BTW Media because public-source evidence links it to internet infrastructure, governance, operational dependencies, or market visibility.

• Stakeholders criticise AFRINIC over lack of transparency and disqualification of votes.
• Network operators warn that the registry’s dysfunction may hinder internet growth across Africa.

Election disqualifications deepen AFRINIC’s legitimacy crisis

AFRINIC’s 2025 board election process has reignited longstanding concerns about transparency and internal governance. Multiple votes were disqualified on grounds critics claim were vague and selectively enforced. According to sources close to the process, AFRINIC reps allegedly contacted voters directly—a move widely condemned as a breach of neutrality and trust.

The controversy follows a pattern of dysfunction dating back to earlier election cycles, when disorganisation, legal challenges, and board inaction plagued the registry. Ongoing court cases have further destabilised AFRINIC, leaving its policy implementation gridlocked and members increasingly frustrated with operational delays.

Also read: Could a public audit save AFRINIC from collapse?
Also read: How AFRINIC’s board elections became a political battlefield

Network operators are losing confidence in AFRINIC’s leadership

The implications of AFRINIC’s instability extend well beyond internal politics. As Africa’s sole Regional Internet Registry, AFRINIC plays a critical role in allocating IP addresses to internet service providers and maintaining trust in the technical infrastructure that powers regional networks. When its legitimacy is undermined, so too is the confidence of telecom providers and investors.

Operators across the continent are concerned that the registry’s dysfunction is now jeopardising their ability to plan network expansions, acquire resources, and comply with national regulations. Some members are even exploring alternative option, citing the lack of accountability and reform within AFRINIC.

If left unchecked, the situation may reduce Africa’s influence in global internet governance and further delay digital development in underserved regions.