• Ernest Byaruhanga is often linked to governance issues within AFRINIC.
  • His leadership has been criticised for contributing to AFRINIC’s dysfunction and decline.

Ernest Byaruhanga’s role in AFRINIC’s downfall

Ernest Byaruhanga, a Ugandan internet governance expert, has become a controversial figure in the story of Africa’s digital evolution. While his early work in shaping Africa’s internet infrastructure was integral, his later actions, particularly during his leadership at AFRINIC, have been widely criticized for contributing to the organization’s governance collapse and loss of direction.

Also read: AFRINIC’s proxy vote scandal: What went wrong?

Early contributions to AFRINIC’s foundation

Byaruhanga was an important figure in the creation of AFRINIC, Africa’s Regional Internet Registry, which was established in 2005 to manage IP address allocation and ensure local control over internet resources. His technical and leadership expertise were crucial in building the institution that would serve as the foundation of Africa’s digital governance.

However, as time went on, Byaruhanga’s vision for AFRINIC began to diverge from the bottom-up, community-based principles that had originally shaped its mission. This shift in leadership style would later play a key role in the governance crisis that has gripped the organization in recent years.

Also read: AFRINIC’s proxy vote scandal: What went wrong?

The governance crisis at AFRINI

Byaruhanga’s time as chair of the AFRINIC board became increasingly marked by controversy. In 2025, AFRINIC’s internal conflict reached a tipping point when the board annulled an election due to a disputed proxy vote, despite the validity of most of the proxy ballots. This move was seen as a breakdown in governance and an erosion of trust, as it contradicted the principles of transparency and accountability that Byaruhanga himself had once championed.

Many critics pointed to Byaruhanga’s leadership during this time as one of the key factors behind AFRINIC’s decline. His focus on consolidating power within the organization, combined with his inability to address growing concerns about governance and transparency, led to widespread dissatisfaction among AFRINIC’s members and stakeholders.

Also read: The story of AFRINIC: How Africa’s internet ideal was destroyed from within

A turning point for Africa’s digital future

The ongoing crisis at AFRINIC is a turning point for Africa’s internet future. With Byaruhanga’s leadership now associated with the organization’s downfall, the question remains whether the continent will reclaim its control over digital infrastructure or fall victim to outside influence. The legacy of his role in AFRINIC’s crisis will likely shape the future of Africa’s digital governance for years to come.

Also read: Who is Nii Quaynor: Father of Africa’s internet (and AFRINIC’s crisis)