Skip to main content

Institution profiling / Global Institutional Trends

Texas wins $1.38B Google deal

Texas settles with Google for $1.38B over user data collection through Incognito, Location History, and biometric tools.

Texas wins $1.38B Google deal

Texas wins $1.

  • Deal resolves privacy violation claims.
  • Google denies wrongdoing in settlement.

What happened: Google agrees to pay over user data handling

On 9 May 2025, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a $1.375 billion settlement with Google. This ends two lawsuits that alleged the company broke consumer protection laws. These claims involved Google’s handling of user data in Incognito mode, Location History, and biometric tracking.

According to Paxton, Google continued to collect user location and browsing data even when users believed tracking was off. The lawsuits also raised concerns about Google recording facial geometry and voiceprints without consent.

Google did not admit fault. It said the claims were outdated and its data policies have since changed. No changes to products are required as part of the settlement. Texas did not specify how the funds would be used. This is one of the largest state settlements for alleged data misuse.

Also read: Arelion expands AI-optimised Texas network
Also read: Texas Instruments secures $1.6B for chip manufacturing expansion

Why it’s important

This settlement highlights growing legal action over user privacy. It shows that states are willing to take strong action when tech firms allegedly misuse data. The size of the fine reflects the seriousness of the claims.

The case centres on whether users were properly informed about Google’s tracking. Location History and Incognito mode were both cited as features that misled users. The suit also raised concerns about the collection of biometric data, such as voice and facial recognition.

Although Google did not admit wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay a large sum. The case may influence how other states address digital privacy. It may also lead to stricter controls on how tech companies design and explain data features.

Member Briefing

Deeper Profile Context

Sign in with the right membership level to unlock the full briefing and source notes.

Only for Strategic Circle

Strategic Circle

Open to all readers. Unlock profile briefings after joining and signing in.

Join Strategic Circle

Only for Leadership Alliance

Leadership Alliance

For qualified IP-asset owners and management; sign in to unlock alliance briefings.

Join Leadership Alliance
Snapshot
Confidence
Confidence score guide
Limited confidence (72%)

Several public sources

BackAll Companies Only for Strategic Circle

Recommended reading

When Is a Recommendation Really Complete? The Governance Design of the UN’s C34 Repository
Global Institutional TrendsWhen Is a Recommendation Really Complete? The Governance Design of the UN’s C34 Repository21 Oct 2026
The FSB will formalise its policy process after review finds design can hinder implementation
Global Institutional TrendsThe FSB will formalise its policy process after review finds design can hinder implementation14 Oct 2026
Gavi’s HSS Transition Waiver Needs a Record Beyond the Board Vote
Global Institutional TrendsGavi’s HSS Transition Waiver Needs a Record Beyond the Board Vote14 Oct 2026
The UN Tax Convention’s Accreditation Desk Is Part of Its Governance
Global Institutional TrendsThe UN Tax Convention’s Accreditation Desk Is Part of Its Governance14 Oct 2026
BlueMatrix and Aiera have the authoring link; paid AI use is the open test
Global Institutional TrendsBlueMatrix and Aiera have the authoring link; paid AI use is the open test9 Oct 2026