Cloud Innovation draws scrutiny in AFRINIC power struggle

Cloud Innovation draws scrutiny in AFRINIC power struggle is profiled by BTW Media because published evidence links it to internet infrastructure, governance, operational dependencies, or market visibility.

• AFRINIC critic Cloud Innovation accused of destabilising African internet governance to further its own interests
• Lawsuits, policy challenges and calls for dissolution raise questions over who really benefits from AFRINIC’s crisis

Cloud Innovation accused of exploiting AFRINIC crisis

In the ongoing AFRINIC controversy, IP address management firm Cloud Innovation is once again in the spotlight—this time facing criticism for escalating litigation while presenting itself as a reform advocate. Although Cloud Innovation has highlighted AFRINIC’s lack of transparency and financial accountability, stakeholders are questioning whether its goal is accountability or influence.

Founded in Seychelles, Cloud Innovation has filed multiple lawsuits against AFRINIC, challenged board elections, and called for the registry’s dissolution. While the company argues these actions are necessary to safeguard fair resource allocation, critics say the legal onslaught has paralysed AFRINIC’s operations, with no viable alternative proposed. Some allege Cloud Innovation benefits from the confusion: it retains a large number of allocated IP addresses that remain in legal limbo due to suspended audits and frozen resources.

Also Read: Cloud Innovation calls for AFRINIC wind-up
Also Read: Cloud Innovation calls for AFRINIC wind-up after ‘impossible’ election standards

Who benefits from AFRINIC’s dysfunction?

Cloud Innovation’s tactics—though legally grounded—are beginning to appear less like reform and more like regulatory sabotage. By flooding AFRINIC with litigation and simultaneously advocating for new governance models, the company creates the impression of a principled defender of internet stability. Yet the reality may be more self-serving.

If Cloud Innovation succeeds in dissolving AFRINIC without consensus, Africa risks losing local autonomy over its internet resources. Such a vacuum could open the door to external entities or commercial interests, weakening regional internet governance. Rather than leading reform, Cloud Innovation may be destabilising it for competitive advantage. With no clear plan for what comes after AFRINIC, observers fear fragmentation and loss of accountability.