Core Entity Brief
| Entity | Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition |
|---|---|
| Public role | Because the coalition is named after a multilateral security initiative, its registry activity is monitored for signals of network activation, administrative change, or resource transfer. Any shift could alter threat assessments and internet governance observations tied to state-linked or military-named entities. |
| Region | Global |
| Category | Digital infrastructure institution |
| Primary domain | Infrastructure |
| Signal focus | Institution Type |
| Time horizon | QUARTER_30_120D |
| Impact | Medium |
| Confidence | 0.95 |
| Evidence coverage | 1 public source reference |
| Related coverage | Profile anchor article |
| Website | Public evidence pending |
| Last update | Jun 03, 2026 |
Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition is a registry-listed resource holder for AS216465; its operational activities and network footprint are unconfirmed beyond the RIPE WHOIS record.
What It Does
- Registry-based resource holder: The coalition holds an autonomous system number registration in the RIPE NCC service region. No evidence of commercial services, revenue, or paying customers exists.
- No known operational network: The evidence does not show any active network services or BGP routing originating from this ASN.
Operating Snapshot
- Registry identity: The RIPE database lists the organisation under handle ORG-IMCT1-RIPE with the official name Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition.
- Routing status: The evidence set does not include BGP data, so no assessment of active routing can be made.
Control Surface
- Public WHOIS record: The WHOIS entry for AS216465 is the only publicly observable control surface. Any updates to this record would constitute administrative activity.
- Absence of routing data: The lack of BGP routing information limits the ability to detect operational network use. Any future appearance of routing data would change the assessment.
Watchpoints
- Record freshness: WHOIS records can become stale. A subsequent update or the appearance of an official website would refine the profile and could indicate current administrative oversight.
- Footprint change: The initiation of BGP announcements, acquisition of IP prefixes, or a PeeringDB entry would signal operational network use and prompt a full reassessment of the coalition’s internet infrastructure role.

