- The debate over IP address allocation is shifting towards whether individuals should receive IP addresses directly from RIRs, with concerns about security, technical expertise, and the ongoing IPv4 address shortage.
- One member suggests a tiered approach for allocation, offering individual users access with safeguards and educational support, while maintaining businesses as the primary recipients of IP addresses.
ARIN community discusses the feasibility of allocating IP addresses to individuals
A lively discussion has emerged within the ARIN community regarding the possibility of allocating IP addresses to individuals directly from RIRs. Historically, RIRs such as ARIN have allocated IP resources to businesses and organisations, or sole proprietorships. However, with growing demand for more granular control over internet resources, stakeholders are reconsidering this approach and asking whether individuals should also be granted licenses through ARIN.
In a recent discussion, one member expressed his dismay thus: “If a sole proprietorship is accepted, I am confused as to why an individual cannot be accepted as they are generally the same legal entity.”
John Curran, President and CEO at ARIN, replied: “While it’s true in theory that ARIN could adopt a model where it directly serves individuals, this would represent a significant departure from the registry model we inherited and have operated under for decades. Even though individuals and organizations can both be legal entities, that does not mean they are treated identically under law.”
One expert in internet governance chimed in to note that there are notable differences in how RIRs manage the allocation of IP addresses to individuals. For example, RIPE NCC allocates addresses to around 1,000 (or 5% of its membership) to “natural persons” with and without registered businesses. APNIC has allocated resources to 5-10 individual members, mostly without economic activity. AFRINIC has stated that individuals qualify as end-users, though none have yet received resources.
Should individuals receive IP addresses directly from RIRs?
Historically, IP addresses have been allocated to organisations that provide internet services or operate large-scale networks. For individuals, IP addresses are typically provided through Internet Service Providers (ISPs), which manage the address allocation on their behalf. However, with the rise of personal networks and the increasing reliance on connected devices, there are growing calls to reconsider this approach.
“Individuals already rely on ISPs for IP address allocation, but as more people work from home, use IoT devices, and participate in online gaming, we’re seeing the need for more granular control over their own internet resources,” said one member. “While the idea of individuals directly obtaining IP addresses from RIRs is not yet widespread, it’s an issue that warrants serious consideration.”
The member argues that direct access to IP addresses for individuals could empower them with greater autonomy over their digital lives. It could also reduce the reliance on ISPs, which often control large blocks of IP addresses and could, theoretically, misuse that control for profit or policy purposes. “By directly allocating IP addresses to individuals, we would create a more decentralised internet where individuals are less dependent on intermediaries. But, this brings its own set of challenges.”
Also read: Cloud Innovation welcomes AFRINIC Receiver, urges continued allocation of IP addresses to ensure African business growth
Also read: How changing IP addresses impacts web performance and security
The current model: RIRs and businesses
Under the current model, IP addresses are distributed to businesses and service providers by RIRs, which then allocate them to end-users (individuals or smaller organisations) through ISPs. This hierarchical system works well in the sense that businesses are better equipped to manage the technical and security aspects of IP address allocation. RIRs, as entities focused on resource distribution and policy enforcement, are already set up to assess and manage large-scale address assignments.
Businesses, by nature, have the infrastructure to support IP address management. “A business has the technical capacity, security protocols, and experience in managing large networks. They can handle the responsibility of distributing and protecting IP addresses more effectively than individuals can,” a member said. “RIRs would also have a much clearer and more efficient process for monitoring and auditing IP address allocations to businesses, ensuring compliance with internet governance standards.”
The business model not only ensures that resources are distributed efficiently but also protects against the misuse of IP addresses. “Businesses are bound by contracts, regulatory frameworks, and service agreements that enforce compliance,” another pointed out. “Individuals, however, may not have the necessary understanding or infrastructure to prevent potential misuse of their allocated resources.”
The challenges of allocating IP addresses to individuals
The prospect of allocating IP addresses to individuals raises several logistical and technical concerns. One of the primary challenges is ensuring that individuals possess the technical expertise required to manage an IP address. Without adequate education and understanding, individuals may unknowingly expose themselves to security risks. “If you give an individual an IP address, they need to understand how to secure their network. Without proper security measures in place, they could be vulnerable to cyberattacks.”
Furthermore, from a governance standpoint, it would be more difficult to regulate and monitor individual IP address usage. “RIRs have established mechanisms for auditing businesses and large organisations, but individuals do not typically have the same infrastructure for monitoring usage,” a member said. “This could lead to an increase in fraud, cybercrimes, or misappropriation of address resources.”
Another consideration is the scarcity of IPv4 addresses, which continues to be a concern despite the ongoing adoption of IPv6. The member noted that the demand for IP addresses is not slowing down, and allocating them directly to individuals could further strain the already limited supply. “We’re already in a situation where IPv4 addresses are exhausted. The more individuals you allow to receive direct allocations, the more pressure you put on an already strained system,” the member warned.
The need for a tiered allocation process
Given these challenges, RIRs could implement a tiered approach to IP address allocation, differentiating between individuals and businesses. “One potential solution could be to offer more flexible and decentralised models for individual IP addresses while still keeping businesses as the primary recipients. For instance, you could reserve smaller, more manageable blocks of IP addresses for individual users, but with limitations on their usage and timeframes.”
Such a tiered system would allow individuals to obtain IP addresses, but with certain restrictions to ensure that the broader internet infrastructure remains protected. For example, RIRs could offer educational programs to help individuals understand how to manage their IP addresses securely. “If we’re going to give individuals access to IP addresses, they need the knowledge to use them safely. A public education programme could help bridge that gap.”
Additionally, RIRs could collaborate with ISPs to ensure that individuals have access to the right resources and guidance to manage their IP addresses effectively. “This could be a compromise. ISPs could continue their role as intermediaries but with more support and education from RIRs. This would allow individuals to manage their own addresses within a controlled, secure environment.”
RIRs and the future of IP address allocation
The debate over whether individuals should receive IP addresses directly from RIRs is a complex one, with many factors to consider, including technical capacity, security risks, and the global shortage of IPv4 addresses. While some argue for greater individual autonomy in managing internet resources, others believe that businesses and service providers are better equipped to handle the responsibilities involved in IP address management.
A potential solution may lie in a hybrid model, where individuals can obtain IP addresses but with limitations and guidance, ensuring that the overall health and security of the internet ecosystem are maintained. As the member succinctly put it: “It’s not about whether individuals should be able to get IP addresses—it’s about how we do it safely and sustainably.”
