Retour au desk entreprisesTEFEXIA Co., Ltd.
Technology market and infrastructure profile visual with growth structure.
Reference visual: company and capital context snapshot.

Briefing entreprise / Digital infrastructure institution

TEFEXIA Co., Ltd.

TEFEXIA is tracked because its single-upstream architecture and self-reported service commitments create a concentrated dependency for any organization that places workloads on its infrastructure. Any change in routing, peering, or abuse policy can interrupt reachability, while the lack of independent monitoring leaves external assurance ungrounded. The company’s opaque corporate link to Tefexia LC and the incomplete registry timeline add further watchpoints for operators who rely on its transit or DDoS mitigation.

Dossier de preuves

Sources primaires utilisées pour la classification et l'évaluation d'impact.

Contexte

TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. is a South Korean internet infrastructure provider operating AS216425, selling cloud compute, IP transit, colocation, and DDoS mitigation from its tefexia.net website. Its operational control surface is defined by self-published terms that allow hourly billing, AUP enforcement, and a 99.0% availability target. The company relies on a single upstream, AS53388 Tefexia LC, creating a systemic chokepoint. Key unknowns include the corporate link to Tefexia LC, independent performance verification, and commercial depth. Watch for registry changes, prefix activity, upstream shifts, and service term modifications.

Core Entity Brief

Core Entity Brief

EntityTEFEXIA Co., Ltd.
Public roleTEFEXIA is tracked because its single-upstream architecture and self-reported service commitments create a concentrated dependency for any organization that places workloads on its infrastructure. Any change in routing, peering, or abuse policy can interrupt reachability, while the lack of independent monitoring leaves external assurance ungrounded. The company’s opaque corporate link to Tefexia LC and the incomplete registry timeline add further watchpoints for operators who rely on its transit or DDoS mitigation.
RegionSouth Korea
CategoryDigital infrastructure institution
Primary domainInfrastructure
Signal focusInstitution Type
Time horizonQUARTER_30_120D
ImpactMedium
Confidence0.95
Evidence coverage11 public source references
Related coverageProfile anchor article
WebsitePublic evidence pending
Last updateJun 03, 2026

TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. is a South Korean internet infrastructure provider operating AS216425, selling cloud compute, IP transit, colocation, and DDoS mitigation via tefexia.net, with all connectivity routed through a single upstream, Tefexia LC.

What It Does

  • Service portfolio: Offers hourly-billed VPS, bare metal, reserved IPs, BGP sessions, firewall groups, DDoS defense, domain registration, and colocation as described in its May 2026 terms of service.
  • Revenue model: Charges by the hour for compute and IP resources, with additional fees for traffic overage and domain management; no independent financial disclosures confirm scale or profitability.

Operating Snapshot

  • Corporate identity: Incorporated as 주식회사 테페시아 in South Korea on August 21, 2025, and registered in the RIPE database under ORG-TCL97-RIPE with AS216425.
  • Routing footprint: Advertises IPv4 prefixes only, with no IPv6 origination visible through public observers BGP.tools and IPinfo; hosted domain count varies by source.
  • Peering and transit: Depends exclusively on AS53388 Tefexia LC for upstream connectivity; no downstream ASes or alternative peers appear in current routing data.

Control Surface

  • Service terms: Terms grant the company authority to block instances without prior notice for severe AUP violations and set a 99.0% monthly availability obligation.
  • Data collection: Privacy policy permits collection of instance metrics, access logs, IP addresses, and physical IDC entry records for service, security, and legal compliance.

Watchpoints

  • Upstream dependency: Any change in the relationship with Tefexia LC, such as a new upstream provider or BGP route changes, will directly affect service continuity.
  • IPv6 adoption: The appearance of IPv6 prefixes would signal service evolution and reduce single-stack risk.
  • Performance transparency: Independent third-party audits, customer-anonymized uptime data, or real-time status pages would support or refute self-reported claims.
  • Registry changes: Modifications to AS216425's RIPE registration, corporate name, or associated contacts could reflect structural changes.

Domain of operation

TEFEXIA is tracked because its single-upstream architecture and self-reported service commitments create a concentrated dependency for any organization that places workloads on its infrastructure. Any change in routing, peering, or abuse policy can interrupt reachability, while the lack of independent monitoring leaves external assurance ungrounded. The company’s opaque corporate link to Tefexia LC and the incomplete registry timeline add further watchpoints for operators who rely on its transit or DDoS mitigation.

  • Public role: TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. is framed by tefexia is tracked because its single-upstream architecture and self-reported service commitments create a concentrated dependency for any organization that places workloads on its infrastructure. any change in routing, peering, or abuse policy can interrupt reachability, while the lack of independent monitoring leaves external assurance ungrounded. the company’s opaque corporate link to tefexia lc and the incomplete registry timeline add further watchpoints for operators who rely on its transit or ddos mitigation. and public infrastructure context. Evidence basis: Registry RDAP / WHOIS record; bgp.tools
  • Operating surface: Internet infrastructure and South Korea provide the public context for this institution profile. Evidence basis: Registry RDAP / WHOIS record; bgp.tools

Timeline

  1. TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. public profile updated

    Public coverage records TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. as a subject for role, operating context, and evidence review.

Signal Map

Signal Map

  • Why tracked: TEFEXIA is tracked because its single-upstream architecture and self-reported service commitments create a concentrated dependency for any organization that places workloads on its infrastructure. Any change in routing, peering, or abuse policy can interrupt reachability, while the lack of independent monitoring leaves external assurance ungrounded. The company’s opaque corporate link to Tefexia LC and the incomplete registry timeline add further watchpoints for operators who rely on its transit
  • Object role: TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. (주식회사 테페시아) operates as a digital infrastructure provider. Its public surface includes routing policy for AS216425, delivery of cloud compute, BGP transit, and DDoS defense, and enforcement of acceptable-use and data-collection rules described in its official terms. The company’s operational authority over customer workloads is exercised through hourly-billed services and the ability to block instances without prior notice for AUP violations.
  • Impact note: Customers using TEFEXIA’s compute, reserved IPs, BGP, transit, colocation, or DDoS mitigation can experience service interruption if the company changes routes, loses its single upstream, or adjusts filters. Self-reported performance and the absence of third-party audits mean that actual uptime and attack absorption cannot be externally confirmed, elevating the risk for mission-critical deployments.
  • Control surface: public operating records, official service pages, source-backed relationship updates
  • Key dependencies: official company sources, public registries, operator-published records

Public View

The public read of TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. is limited to visible role, operating context, and relationship evidence.

Watchpoints

  • New public role, affiliation, product, policy, or market disclosures.
  • Verified relationship changes involving named organizations or people.

Caveats

  • Private or unverified claims are excluded from this public view.

FAQ

Why is TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. included?

TEFEXIA Co., Ltd. has public evidence that makes the institution relevant to BTW's coverage of digital infrastructure, governance, or markets.

What is public about this profile?

The public layer covers visible role, operating context, linked organizations, and evidence-backed watchpoints.

What should readers watch next?

Readers should watch for source-backed role changes, new partnerships, regulatory exposure, operating expansion, or evidence that changes the public assessment.

Actions