Back to Companies DeskIgor A Piscov
Technology market and infrastructure profile visual with growth structure.
Reference visual: company and capital context snapshot.

Company Briefing / Digital infrastructure institution

Igor A Piscov

Piscov matters because his concentrated authority over a small but regionally significant ISP means any change in his corporate status or registry role would directly affect the reliability of AS211951 coordination and the continuity of broadband and communications services in the Kostroma area. Network peers, regulators, and local customers all depend on the stability of the person-to-network linkage his public records establish.

Evidence Pack

Primary-source references used for classification and impact scoring.

Context

Igor A Piscov is the sole director and owner of LocalNet+ OOO, a small Kostroma ISP, and its RIPE registry contact for AS211951. Public evidence from RIPE whois, Russian corporate registries, and the operator’s own website confirms his concentrated authority. No independent biography or personal technical duties are verified, and the English-Cyrillic name link is contextual. Key watchpoints include changes in corporate registries, RIPE contact updates, tariff shifts, and BGP visibility. His role makes him a single point of failure for local connectivity.

Core Entity Brief

Core Entity Brief

EntityIgor A Piscov
Public rolePiscov matters because his concentrated authority over a small but regionally significant ISP means any change in his corporate status or registry role would directly affect the reliability of AS211951 coordination and the continuity of broadband and communications services in the Kostroma area. Network peers, regulators, and local customers all depend on the stability of the person-to-network linkage his public records establish.
RegionRussia
CategoryDigital infrastructure institution
Primary domainInfrastructure
Signal focusInstitution Type
Time horizonQuarter (30-120d)
ImpactMedium
Confidence0.95
Evidence coverage12 public source references
Related coverageProfile anchor article
WebsitePublic evidence pending
Last updateJun 03, 2026

LocalNet+ OOO is a Kostroma-based broadband and communications provider whose paid residential, business, television, telephony and video services make Igor A Piscov's authority operationally material.

What It Does

  • Residential broadband subscriptions: LocalNet+ OOO sells recurring residential broadband access in Kostroma, nearby settlements and Kostroma Oblast. Its tariff page lists unlimited monthly plans for apartment buildings, private-sector customers and regional customers, with speed tiers varying by locality and technical availability.
  • Business connectivity: The company markets business internet with unlimited traffic, 5 to 100 Mbit/s speed options and static IP address service, placing local organisations alongside households in the paying customer base.
  • Adjacent communications services: The operator site presents digital television, local telephony, residential video surveillance and cloud video surveillance, so the service surface extends into communications and premises-monitoring services rather than broadband alone.
  • Concentrated authority model: Corporate-profile pages name Писцов Игорь Александрович as director and sole founder or 100% participant of ООО ЛОКАЛНЕТ+, concentrating the corporate authority associated with the LocalNet+ operating context.

Operating Snapshot

  • Operator identity: The official contact page describes ООО ЛокалНет+ as a broadband internet provider in Kostroma, Kostroma district, Kostroma Oblast and nearby settlements, and lists INN 4401161027, KPP 440101001 and OGRN 1154401003130.
  • Corporate registry context: Corporate-profile pages list LocalNet+ OOO as active, registered on 14 April 2015, with main activity 61.10 for wired telecommunications and Писцов Игорь Александрович as director from registration.
  • Scale indicators: Rusprofile reports 2024 revenue of about 76.5 to 77 million rubles and 21 employees; T-Bank's contractor profile reports 2025 revenue of 87.91 million rubles and profit of 1.13 million rubles.
  • Commercial service surface: The official tariff and business pages list household broadband plans, unlimited business plans, static IP address options, customer support and add-on services including television, telephony and video surveillance.
  • Network footprint: IPIP, IPinfo and BigDataCloud associate AS211951 LOCALNET-AS with LocalNet+ OOO and 46.8.142.0/23, making the network small in global routing terms but concrete and externally visible.

Control Surface

  • Registry and ASN surface: AS211951, ORG-LO95-RIPE and IAP39-RIPE create a public registry-accountability surface for LocalNet+ OOO. RIPE-style WHOIS context lists Igor A Piscov in administrative and technical contact roles for LOCALNET-AS.
  • Customer access surface: LocalNet+ controls customer-facing connection requests, tariff notices, support posture, residential plan design, business-service terms and static IP options for a local broadband customer base.
  • Routing footprint: Public routing datasets associate AS211951 with 46.8.142.0/23, 512 IPv4 addresses, no visible IPv6 addresses in the reviewed summaries, and upstream or peer visibility involving TransTeleCom and Vimpelcom.
  • Regulated telecom surface: The operator site and commercial contractor profiles point to regulated telecom activity and communications licenses, but license-status details need regulator-original confirmation before legal wording is used.
  • Video-service surface: Published video and cloud-video services add a control surface involving cameras, real-time access, archive access, customer permissions and hosted monitoring for residential or business sites.

Watchpoints

  • Transliteration bridge: The English registry name Igor A Piscov and the Cyrillic corporate name Писцов Игорь Александрович align through company, address, role, initial and network context, but no supplied public page carried both forms together.
  • Currentness: Corporate roles, ownership, tariff pages, support hours, license entries and BGP visibility can change and should be refreshed close to publication.
  • License status: T-Bank and Rusprofile show communications-license entries and status nuance; regulator-original confirmation is needed before describing current license status in legal terms.
  • Scale interpretation: The routed footprint is small, so materiality comes from local service dependency, customer-facing control and concentrated authority rather than global routing scale.
  • Surveillance-service boundary: Cloud video surveillance and archive access are meaningful service surfaces; public treatment should stay with the operator's own claims unless customer counts, retention practices or incidents are independently verified.

Domain of operation

Piscov matters because his concentrated authority over a small but regionally significant ISP means any change in his corporate status or registry role would directly affect the reliability of AS211951 coordination and the continuity of broadband and communications services in the Kostroma area. Network peers, regulators, and local customers all depend on the stability of the person-to-network linkage his public records establish.

  • Public role: Igor A Piscov is framed by piscov matters because his concentrated authority over a small but regionally significant isp means any change in his corporate status or registry role would directly affect the reliability of as211951 coordination and the continuity of broadband and communications services in the kostroma area. network peers, regulators, and local customers all depend on the stability of the person-to-network linkage his public records establish. and public infrastructure context. Evidence basis: Registry RDAP / WHOIS record; RIPE registry record
  • Operating surface: Network operator and Russia provide the public context for this institution profile. Evidence basis: Registry RDAP / WHOIS record; RIPE registry record

Timeline

  1. Igor A Piscov public profile updated

    Public coverage records Igor A Piscov as a subject for role, operating context, and evidence review.

Signal Map

Signal Map

  • Why tracked: Piscov matters because his concentrated authority over a small but regionally significant ISP means any change in his corporate status or registry role would directly affect the reliability of AS211951 coordination and the continuity of broadband and communications services in the Kostroma area. Network peers, regulators, and local customers all depend on the stability of the person-to-network linkage his public records establish.
  • Object role: He functions as the administrative and technical contact for LocalNet+ OOO's autonomous system (AS211951), responsible for registry accuracy and coordination, and holds sole executive and ownership authority over the company. Russian corporate records list him as director and sole founder, granting him unilateral control over business strategy, tariff setting, service portfolio, and regulatory compliance for the Kostroma-based ISP.
  • Impact note: If Piscov were to depart the company or the RIPE contact became erroneous, the public ability to manage routing, handle abuse, or verify the legal entity behind the provider would be compromised. His sole control over tariff decisions, network investments, and regulatory filings amplifies the local impact of any operational or governance failure, making him a single point of failure for the region's connectivity.
  • Control surface: public operating records, official service pages, source-backed relationship updates
  • Key dependencies: official company sources, public registries, operator-published records

Public View

The public read of Igor A Piscov is limited to visible role, operating context, and relationship evidence.

Watchpoints

  • New public role, affiliation, product, policy, or market disclosures.
  • Verified relationship changes involving named organizations or people.

Caveats

  • Private or unverified claims are excluded from this public view.

FAQ

Why is Igor A Piscov included?

Igor A Piscov has public evidence that makes the institution relevant to BTW's coverage of digital infrastructure, governance, or markets.

What is public about this profile?

The public layer covers visible role, operating context, linked organizations, and evidence-backed watchpoints.

What should readers watch next?

Readers should watch for source-backed role changes, new partnerships, regulatory exposure, operating expansion, or evidence that changes the public assessment.

Actions