Vicente Sosa Peralta, CDENET and the Public Record Behind AS267837

Summary

• Vicente Sosa Peralta appears in Paraguay's public network record through a compact but coherent set of identifiers. His full name is attached to AS267837 in network directories and membership tables, while CDENET appears as the associated service identity. Regulatory records from CONATEL provide the internet-transmission setting, and membership pages maintained by PIT Paraguay and IX CDE place the same autonomous system within the country's interconnection landscape.
• The public record around Vicente Sosa Peralta begins with an unusually precise technical key: AS267837. An autonomous system number is designed to identify a routing domain on the internet. It is not a biography, a company history or a measure of commercial importance. Its usefulness here is more basic. It gives several independent public pages a common reference point, making it possible to see that they concern the same network identity rather than merely similar names.

A name made visible through network identifiers

The public record around Vicente Sosa Peralta begins with an unusually precise technical key: AS267837. An autonomous system number is designed to identify a routing domain on the internet. It is not a biography, a company history or a measure of commercial importance. Its usefulness here is more basic. It gives several independent public pages a common reference point, making it possible to see that they concern the same network identity rather than merely similar names.

On the PIT Paraguay member page, the entry is presented as “AS267837 - VICENTE SOSA PERALTA.” The format is economical: a number and a name in a table maintained by a national interconnection organization. It does not explain when the network was established, how its work developed or what decisions led to the entry. Yet it provides a direct, public association between the autonomous system and the full name.

PeeringDB supplies a second association. Its page for AS267837 identifies the network under Vicente Sosa Peralta and connects CDENET as another name used in the service context. Because the ASN is the same, the PeeringDB and PIT entries can be read as complementary records. One sits in a Paraguay membership table; the other sits in a widely used directory for network interconnection information.

This is the strongest way to approach the identity boundary. The subject is not every person who may share the name Vicente Sosa Peralta, nor every entity using a similar commercial label. It is the specific conjunction of the full name, Paraguay, the Ciudad del Este interconnection setting, CDENET and AS267837. Removing the ASN would make the identification less exact. Keeping it at the center preserves the narrowness of the available evidence.

The distinction also prevents a public network record from becoming an invented personal narrative. A routing identifier can establish that a named operator is publicly connected to a network. It cannot reveal temperament, ambition or management style. The evidence becomes more informative as the technical and institutional references align, but it remains evidence about network identity. That is the line running through every other record in this account.

CONATEL and the regulatory layer

Paraguay's telecommunications regulator, CONATEL, provides the regulatory setting in which the CDENET record can be understood. The relevant material is part of the Registro Nacional de Servicios de Telecomunicaciones, or RNST, and concerns internet data transmission. A CONATEL RNST document from April 2020 and a later RNST document serve as public registry references for this context.

Regulatory lists perform a specific function. They document entries within an authorization and registration framework administered by a public body. For a reader trying to understand AS267837, that framework is important because it adds a legal and institutional layer distinct from the routing directories. The CONATEL documents do not simply repeat a PeeringDB profile or an exchange membership. They belong to a different system of public accountability.

Their presence should not be overstated. A registry entry is not a regulatory endorsement of commercial performance, and its appearance does not establish how customers experience a service. It says nothing by itself about the size of an operator, the extent of a network, financial results or comparative standing. The documents are useful because they make an internet-transmission identity visible in the regulator's records, not because they answer questions outside that function.

This disciplined reading matters especially when several official-looking records are assembled. It can be tempting to treat a regulator's list as a complete account of an operating business. In reality, the RNST layer is one part of the picture. It helps anchor CDENET in the public telecommunications context, while the autonomous system and exchange records explain a different aspect: how the network identifies itself and appears within interconnection structures.

For Sosa Peralta, the CONATEL material therefore contributes context rather than personal detail. It does not independently supply a life story. It provides the public regulatory background against which the same CDENET and internet-transmission identity can be read. That narrower use is both more accurate and more revealing, because it preserves the separate roles of regulator, network directory and interconnection organization.

Two registry snapshots, read with restraint

The dates attached to the CONATEL material create two public snapshots rather than a continuous operating history. The April 2020 RNST document records an earlier point in the regulator's published internet-transmission data. The later RNST document provides another point of reference. Their relationship allows a reader to see that the regulatory context is not confined to a single isolated page, but it does not fill every interval between the two records.

That difference between snapshots and chronology is essential. Public lists are often updated in cycles and presented for administrative purposes. They can establish that an entry was visible in a given publication without explaining every change that may have occurred before or after it. Reading them responsibly means staying close to what the documents are designed to record and avoiding a narrative of uninterrupted expansion, contraction or continuity that the lists do not themselves provide.

The same restraint applies to terminology. Internet transmission is a regulatory service context, while CDENET is the service-facing identity associated elsewhere with AS267837. The presence of these references across records helps connect the institutional and technical layers. It does not authorize conclusions about the precise form of every service, its reception in the market or the results it produced.

The two documents also illustrate why public network identities are assembled from more than one kind of record. A regulatory PDF can situate an operator within an official category, but it is not intended to explain routing policy or exchange participation. Conversely, PeeringDB and IXP pages can show how an autonomous system is represented for interconnection, but they do not replace a national authorization record. Their value lies in combination, with each source kept within its own scope.

For a profile centered on Sosa Peralta, this approach avoids two opposite errors. The first would be to ignore the regulator and describe AS267837 as if routing metadata existed without a national telecommunications setting. The second would be to make the regulatory entries carry an entire story they do not contain. The defensible middle is straightforward: CONATEL makes the internet-transmission context publicly visible, and the other records connect that context to a specific network identity.

The result is documentary continuity at the level of public references, not proof of business performance. A reader can follow CDENET across dated regulatory material and then compare that identity with current network and membership pages. The exercise clarifies who and what the records concern. It does not calculate reach, subscribers, revenues or outcomes, and it should not be presented as doing so.

AS267837 as the connective thread

Among all the labels in the record, AS267837 is the most stable connective thread. Names can be formatted differently, and a service identity can appear beside a personal name or in place of it depending on the page. The autonomous system number remains exact. It allows the PIT listing, PeeringDB information and IX CDE customer entry to be matched without relying on branding alone.

This is one reason autonomous system numbers matter outside purely technical discussions. They offer a public reference for networks that exchange routing information with other networks. In this account, the ASN does not need to be treated as evidence of scale or importance. It is useful because it turns a scattered set of pages into a traceable identity. When the number appears, the reader has a precise basis for comparison.

The number also helps distinguish the roles of the associated names. Vicente Sosa Peralta is the name used in the PIT and PeeringDB records. CDENET is the associated network or service identity. Both relate to AS267837, but they are not interchangeable in every context. A person and a service label carry different meanings, even when public directories place them around the same technical identifier.

That distinction becomes practical when reading institutional pages. PIT Paraguay can choose a member-table format centered on the ASN and registered name. PeeringDB can present an interconnection profile with a primary name, an alternative label, a website and a network type. IX CDE can show the customer or member-facing CDENET identity together with the ASN. The formatting differs because the institutions serve different purposes, not necessarily because the underlying network has changed.

AS267837 therefore performs quiet documentary work. It links records without supplying details that are absent from them. It does not explain who performs which operational duties, how decisions are made or how the service is delivered day to day. It simply identifies a routing domain consistently enough for public sources to converge around it.

For readers unfamiliar with this layer of internet infrastructure, the key point is that the number is neither promotional language nor a descriptive nickname. It is a technical identifier with a defined role in routing. In the public record around Sosa Peralta, that precision makes it the safest starting point and the most reliable way to keep the article inside its evidence boundary.

What PeeringDB contributes

PeeringDB adds structured network information to the basic name-and-number association. The PeeringDB API record for AS267837 connects the autonomous system with Vicente Sosa Peralta, the CDENET alternative identity and the public website cdenet.com.py. It also places the record in the Cable/DSL/ISP category. These fields help describe how the network presents itself for interconnection purposes.

The directory's contribution is not that it certifies an operator's results. PeeringDB is useful to networks seeking information about potential interconnection and to observers trying to understand how a network is represented in that environment. Its fields are descriptive metadata. They can establish the published association among the name, ASN, service label, website and type, but they should not be transformed into ratings of capacity, reliability or customer experience.

The “aka” relationship is particularly important here. CDENET is evidence-led as a service or network identity associated with the PeeringDB entry for Sosa Peralta. That supports using both names when discussing AS267837. It does not mean the CDENET website can be treated as a biography of the person, nor does it erase the difference between the individual name and the service-facing label.

The website field provides another cross-reference. It points from a structured network directory toward CDENET's own public-facing site, allowing the reader to see that the service identity is not merely an isolated label in the directory. Still, the link should be used for context. It supports a relationship between the network record and the service surface; it does not independently establish private facts or a personal operating history.

The network type field is similarly bounded. Cable/DSL/ISP describes the category selected for the record. It is reasonable to use that information when explaining why AS267837 belongs in an access-network context. It is not reasonable to derive a precise technology mix, service footprint or market share from the category alone. A directory classification is a useful signpost, not a substitute for detailed operating data.

By keeping those distinctions intact, PeeringDB becomes one of the strongest public sources in the record. It ties together the exact ASN, the full name, CDENET, the website and a network category in one structured entry. That is enough to explain the public network identity clearly. It is not enough, and need not be enough, to turn a technical profile into a claim about how well the network performs.

Keeping the person and CDENET distinct

The public pages invite a careful formulation: Vicente Sosa Peralta is the person named with AS267837, while CDENET is the associated network and service identity. The two belong in the same account because PeeringDB and interconnection records connect them. They should nevertheless remain conceptually distinct. This prevents a service website from being used as personal evidence and prevents a person's name from being treated as a complete description of an operating network.

The CDENET website shows the public service surface attached to the brand. It is appropriate for describing the work context in which that name appears. A service-facing website, however, is built to present services, not to establish a verified biography of every person associated with a network directory. In this record it should be read alongside, rather than in place of, the PIT and PeeringDB identity references.

This division of roles improves the account. PIT directly associates the full name with the ASN. PeeringDB associates the same elements and adds CDENET as an alternative identity. The CDENET site then demonstrates the public-facing use of the service label. No single page has to carry more weight than its format allows, and the connection among them is made through the repeated network identifiers.

The distinction also guards against personal claims that the sources cannot support. A website's service descriptions do not reveal Sosa Peralta's motives, personality or management approach. They do not provide grounds for attributing every statement or choice on the site to him personally. The record shows an association, not a detailed allocation of individual responsibility.

At the same time, separating person and service does not require treating them as unrelated. That would ignore the explicit “aka” relationship in PeeringDB and the way CDENET appears with AS267837 at IX CDE. The accurate position lies between merger and separation: the identities are publicly linked around one autonomous system, but each source should still be used for the kind of fact it is equipped to provide.

This careful language is more than a technical caution. It defines the kind of profile the evidence can sustain. The subject is Sosa Peralta's public network identity as seen through CDENET and AS267837. The subject is not his private life, a character study or an unsupported company narrative. The available record is meaningful precisely because it can be described without crossing those boundaries.

PIT Paraguay and national interconnection visibility

PIT Paraguay's member table places AS267837 within a national interconnection context. The entry's direct format makes the identification clear: the autonomous system number appears beside Vicente Sosa Peralta's full name. In an article built from public network records, that is a consequential piece of evidence because it connects the routing identity to a Paraguay institution devoted to internet traffic exchange.

An internet exchange allows participating networks to interconnect in a shared environment. The existence of a member entry can therefore help explain where a network appears institutionally, beyond its own website or a global directory. For AS267837, PIT's page adds a local layer to the PeeringDB record. It shows that the name and ASN are not visible only through a general network database; they also appear in Paraguay's exchange membership landscape.

The listing should still be read as membership evidence. It does not state how much traffic the network exchanges, how the connection is engineered or what effect participation has on end users. It does not rank members. Treating the table as proof of superior service or national prominence would assign meanings that the page does not provide.

What it does provide is institutional placement. The same exact ASN that organizes the PeeringDB profile is listed by PIT Paraguay. That correspondence strengthens confidence in the identity boundary and helps explain why AS267837 is the right key for the account. It also gives the reader a bridge between the abstract idea of an autonomous system and a concrete interconnection organization within Paraguay.

PIT's naming format is informative as well. It foregrounds Vicente Sosa Peralta rather than CDENET. Elsewhere, particularly in the IX CDE customer pages, the service identity is more prominent. Read together, the pages show how one network may be represented through a personal or registered name in one institutional setting and through a service label in another, while the ASN continues to tie the entries together.

This pattern is common to public infrastructure records: consistency often resides in identifiers rather than presentation. For readers, the practical method is to compare the number first, then evaluate what each institution says around it. In Sosa Peralta's case, PIT contributes a clear public association and a national exchange context. It does not provide the wider claims that might make a profile more dramatic, and there is no need to imply that it does.

IX CDE and the Ciudad del Este connection

IX CDE provides the clearest public connection between CDENET, AS267837 and the interconnection setting in Ciudad del Este. Its general customer details page establishes the directory context, while the specific CDENET entry identifies the member record associated with the network. The detail page connects the CDENET label to AS267837 and presents full-member status with a joined date in 2024.

These are concrete membership facts. They show that the network identity appears in the records of a local internet exchange and indicate how the exchange categorizes the membership. The joined date offers a dated point in the public interconnection record. It should not be expanded into a claim about when all CDENET operations began, because joining a particular exchange and beginning a business or network are different events.

The phrase “full member” also requires a bounded reading. It is a membership status used by IX CDE. It does not establish market leadership, service quality or commercial success. Nor does it explain traffic levels or the practical outcome of the interconnection. Its significance is institutional: the exchange publicly presents CDENET in that category.

Ciudad del Este matters because IX CDE is a local interconnection venue. The membership page therefore gives AS267837 a specific regional infrastructure context that is more precise than a generic statement about Paraguay's internet sector. It allows the account to refer to Ciudad del Este without turning into a broad history of the city, regional commerce or national telecommunications policy.

The IX CDE entry also balances the naming seen at PIT. PIT lists the ASN with Vicente Sosa Peralta, while IX CDE emphasizes CDENET alongside the same autonomous system. PeeringDB sits between those presentations by connecting the personal name, the alternative service identity and the ASN in one record. The three institutions thus offer different views of one network identity.

Taken together, the exchange pages show public participation in two interconnection contexts: PIT Paraguay at the national level and IX CDE in Ciudad del Este. That does not reveal how the network uses every connection, and it should not be treated as a technical performance report. It does, however, make the interconnection dimension of the CDENET record visible in a way that a service website or regulatory list alone could not.

What an exchange record can and cannot show

Interconnection records are valuable because the internet is made from relationships among networks. An autonomous system does not exist in isolation; its identifier is used when routing information is exchanged. Membership directories from PIT Paraguay and IX CDE therefore add an infrastructural dimension to the public record. They show where AS267837 is represented in organizations built around network interconnection.

That dimension is often misunderstood. An exchange membership is evidence of an institutional relationship, not a complete map of network behavior. The public pages cited here do not show every routing arrangement, all traffic paths or the volume carried through a particular venue. They do not establish whether one connection is more important than another. They identify membership and association.

For a network with a service-facing identity such as CDENET, those associations help a reader understand the difference between public retail presentation and internet infrastructure. The website addresses the service surface. The exchange records address participation in shared interconnection environments. PeeringDB organizes metadata used in that world, while CONATEL supplies the national regulatory context. Each layer describes a different interface.

The IX CDE joined date in 2024 is a good example of the limits. It marks when the member record says CDENET joined that exchange. It does not establish an origin date for AS267837, a launch date for every service or a turning point in business performance. A dated fact becomes misleading if it is made to stand for events that the page never describes.

Likewise, the existence of entries at PIT and IX CDE should not be turned into a comparative claim. The record supports saying that AS267837 is publicly listed in both interconnection settings. It does not support saying that the network is larger, better connected or more influential than another network. Those would require additional data and a defined method of comparison.

Within those limits, the records remain substantial. They connect the named operator and CDENET identity to real institutions in Paraguay's internet infrastructure. They make the network traceable beyond self-description. For Sosa Peralta, this is the central narrative available in public view: not a story of acclaim or performance, but a sequence of precise identifiers appearing across regulatory and interconnection systems.

A Ciudad del Este angle without a market claim

The IX CDE record makes Ciudad del Este a legitimate part of the account, but only in a focused way. The city enters through the local exchange and its customer pages, which identify CDENET and AS267837. This is an infrastructure connection grounded in a named institution. It is not evidence for a claim about the network's standing across the city or the wider region.

That distinction keeps the location useful. Without IX CDE, a reference to Ciudad del Este might rely on assumptions or drift into a general discussion of border commerce and telecommunications demand. With the exchange record, the location is tied directly to the public interconnection identity. The article can say where this particular membership appears while leaving broader economic or market questions unanswered.

The local angle also illustrates how infrastructure records can make an operator visible even when conventional biographical reporting is absent. The membership page does not tell readers about Sosa Peralta's background. Instead, it places the associated CDENET network in a concrete technical community. The account is therefore about public legibility through institutions, not about reconstructing a private life from sparse references.

PIT Paraguay broadens that institutional picture without changing the conclusion. Its member table connects the same ASN and full name to a national exchange organization. IX CDE then supplies the specific Ciudad del Este membership entry. The two records complement each other because they work at different institutional levels, but neither provides a basis for estimating geographic coverage or local customer concentration.

It is equally important not to read “local” as a judgment about scale. A local exchange context describes location and institutional purpose. It does not classify an operator's total reach, resources or importance. The available sources do not offer a complete network map, and this account does not infer one.

What can be said is exact. AS267837, associated with Vicente Sosa Peralta and CDENET, appears in PIT Paraguay's member table and in IX CDE's customer records. IX CDE presents the member as having joined in 2024 and as holding full-member status. Those facts make Ciudad del Este part of the network's public interconnection record. They do not need embellishment to be relevant.

The service surface of CDENET

CDENET's website adds a public-facing layer to records that are otherwise largely institutional or technical. It gives the service identity a visible destination and supports describing CDENET as more than an alternate text field in PeeringDB. The directory's website reference and the site itself align around the same brand, while AS267837 provides the technical connection back to Sosa Peralta's named network record.

The site's role in this account is deliberately limited to work and service context. It can show how CDENET presents its service surface to the public. It cannot independently prove that every identity association in the other records is correct, which is why PIT and PeeringDB remain important. Nor can the site be used to draw conclusions about actual service outcomes.

Public-facing service language is necessarily different from regulatory or interconnection metadata. A regulator categorizes entries for administrative purposes. An exchange lists members or customers. PeeringDB offers structured network information. A service site addresses prospective or current users. Reading all four forms as if they were equivalent would blur the evidentiary value of each.

Instead, the website completes a modest chain. PeeringDB identifies CDENET as an alternative identity for the record named Vicente Sosa Peralta, links the domain and lists the network type. IX CDE shows CDENET with AS267837 in a local exchange membership context. The site displays the CDENET service identity publicly. The repeated label is meaningful because the underlying ASN connection is documented elsewhere.

This chain does not authorize a review of CDENET. The sources do not provide an independent basis for judging reliability, pricing, support, network quality or customer satisfaction. They also do not establish subscriber numbers, geographic completeness or profitability. Any such assessment would move outside the record assembled here.

What remains is still informative. The service label has a public website; it is attached in PeeringDB to AS267837; and it appears with that ASN at IX CDE. That is enough to describe CDENET's place in Sosa Peralta's public network identity. It is not a personal biography, and it is not a performance profile. It is the outward-facing part of a record otherwise built from identifiers and institutional listings.

Reading the records as separate layers

The most accurate account of Vicente Sosa Peralta and AS267837 emerges when the sources are treated as separate layers rather than forced into a single all-purpose narrative. CONATEL provides the regulatory layer. PeeringDB provides structured network metadata. PIT Paraguay and IX CDE provide interconnection membership references. CDENET's website provides the service-facing layer.

Each layer answers a narrow question. Is there public regulatory context for the internet-transmission identity? The CONATEL RNST material addresses that. Which name, service label, website and type are associated with the ASN in an interconnection directory? PeeringDB addresses those fields. Where does the ASN appear in Paraguay exchange membership records? PIT and IX CDE provide those references. How is the CDENET label presented publicly? The website offers that view.

No source answers every question. That is not a weakness to be concealed; it is the normal structure of public infrastructure evidence. A regulator does not need to provide a routing profile, and an exchange does not need to publish a company biography. The reader's task is to preserve provenance and avoid importing claims from one domain into another.

The agreement among the layers is strongest around a handful of identifiers: Vicente Sosa Peralta, CDENET and AS267837. Paraguay supplies the national frame, and IX CDE supplies the Ciudad del Este interconnection connection. Those elements can be repeated confidently because they recur in complementary records. More expansive descriptions cannot be repeated with the same confidence because they are not present.

This method also shows why omission can be responsible rather than incomplete. There are no supported grounds here for claims about personal motives, leadership traits, business success or service quality. Adding such language would not make the public record richer; it would make the article less accurate. The documentary story is about how a network identity appears, not about qualities the records never evaluate.

Seen this way, the sources form a concise institutional map. The regulator records a telecommunications context. A global interconnection directory structures the network identity. Two Paraguay exchange organizations list the ASN in their public environments. The service site presents the CDENET label. Sosa Peralta's name is visible at the center because it is directly attached to AS267837 in the PIT and PeeringDB records.

The limits of the available public picture

The public picture is clear in identification and limited in biography. It provides no independent account of Sosa Peralta's education, earlier work, personal history or reasons for operating under the CDENET identity. It does not document who else may perform particular roles. The absence of those details should be acknowledged through the scope of the writing rather than filled with inference.

The operating picture is similarly bounded. The cited pages do not establish subscriber totals, revenue, profit, traffic volume, network capacity or a complete coverage area. They do not measure latency, availability, support response or user satisfaction. A membership status, an ASN profile and a regulatory entry cannot substitute for those measurements.

Even positive-sounding institutional facts require care. Full-member status at IX CDE is the exchange's published category, not an award. Appearance in a CONATEL registry is an administrative fact, not an official quality mark. Inclusion in PIT Paraguay's table is membership evidence, not a ranking. A PeeringDB listing is useful metadata, not an audit of the network.

These limits do not reduce the value of the records. On the contrary, stating them makes the supported facts more credible. The reader can see exactly why Sosa Peralta, CDENET and AS267837 belong in the same account and exactly where the evidence stops. Public-record writing is strongest when it distinguishes direct association from interpretation.

The record also cannot support a broad claim about Paraguay's telecommunications market. The institutions cited are part of that environment, but this account examines only their entries related to Sosa Peralta's network identity. General conclusions about national competition, access, investment or policy would require a much wider evidence base and would distract from the specific identifiers at issue.

What survives every limitation is a compact set of facts. CONATEL provides public RNST context for CDENET and internet transmission. PIT Paraguay lists AS267837 with Vicente Sosa Peralta. PeeringDB links the same ASN, name, CDENET label, website and network type. IX CDE connects CDENET and AS267837 to a full-member entry with a 2024 joined date. Those facts define the defensible picture.

Summary

Vicente Sosa Peralta's public connection to internet infrastructure in Paraguay is most clearly understood through AS267837. PIT Paraguay lists the autonomous system with his full name. PeeringDB identifies the same ASN under Sosa Peralta, associates CDENET as another network or service identity, points to the CDENET website and categorizes the record as Cable/DSL/ISP. These fields provide a structured link between the named operator and the public service label.

CONATEL's RNST documents add the regulatory context for CDENET and internet transmission. Their role is to document public authorization and registry information, not to assess service or commercial results. The dated records offer public snapshots, but they do not provide a complete chronology or support conclusions about growth, continuity or reach.

Interconnection records add a third layer. PIT Paraguay places AS267837 in its member table, while IX CDE connects CDENET and the ASN to the Ciudad del Este exchange context. The IX CDE entry presents full-member status and a joined date in 2024. Those are membership facts, not measures of traffic, quality or market position.

CDENET's website completes the service-facing side of the picture. It supports discussion of the brand's public work context, but it is not a personal source for Sosa Peralta and does not independently establish performance. The person, service label and autonomous system are publicly linked, while remaining distinct forms of identity.

Read together, the records show how a network becomes visible across institutions: through a regulator, a structured interconnection directory, national and local exchange pages, and a service website. Read carefully, they also show the limits of that visibility. The evidence supports a focused account of Vicente Sosa Peralta, CDENET, AS267837, CONATEL, PIT Paraguay and IX CDE, without extending into private biography, business results, service judgments or unsupported explanations.