LACNIC · RIR Watchdog
Legacy Resources Management
Start here for the proposal-by-proposal record: what changed, why it mattered, who argued for what, how positions evolved, what was decided, and where the evidence still has gaps.
Source facts
- Policy ID
- LAC-2023-4
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Official status
- Did not reach consensus
- Introduced
- Jun 30, 2026
- Last source update
- Nov 15, 2026
Who actually shaped the debate?
Policy evolution
text availability and language projection · Version 1 changes the presentation of the undiscussed proposal placeholder from Spanish to English; both retained versions state that the proposal text was not available, so no substantive policy change can be established.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.proposal text availability and legacy resource recovery · Version 2 replaces the hidden undiscussed-version placeholder with a substantive Spanish proposal covering minimum requirements for legacy resources and possible recovery when resources are unused, unannounced, or cannot be verified.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.language and editorial presentation · Version 2 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish with minor wording changes; the supplied evidence preserves the same subject of minimum requirements and possible recovery.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.language and editorial presentation · Version 3 presents the same legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish and makes limited wording changes around Board authority and service conditions; the supplied text retains the same recovery and compliance subject.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.language and editorial presentation · Version 3 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish with minor wording changes; no separate substantive policy mechanism is visible beyond the same compliance and recovery framework.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.Board fee wording · Version 4 keeps the legacy-resource recovery proposal and makes a limited wording clarification that the Board may, for example, establish an alternative fee; no different recovery mechanism is introduced in the retained text.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.Board authority and service conditions · Version 4 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English and clarifies Board-of-Directors authority and access to services; the compliance conditions and possible recovery mechanism remain the same in the supplied text.
Source facts −
Validated evidence is unavailable.Source facts +
Validated evidence is unavailable.Debate timeline
Entities
Loading
Sources and coverage
Official policy sources
Public discussion archives
Coverage
Earliest captured: Oct 21, 1999
Latest captured: Nov 15, 2026
