Skip to main content

LACNIC · RIR Watchdog

Legacy Resources Management

Start here for the proposal-by-proposal record: what changed, why it mattered, who argued for what, how positions evolved, what was decided, and where the evidence still has gaps.

Source facts

Policy ID
LAC-2023-4
RIR
LACNIC
Official status
Did not reach consensus
Introduced
Jun 30, 2026
Last source update
Nov 15, 2026

Who actually shaped the debate?

1Total participants
1Formal actors

Policy evolution

1
Rejected · Did not reach consensus
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

text availability and language projection · Version 1 changes the presentation of the undiscussed proposal placeholder from Spanish to English; both retained versions state that the proposal text was not available, so no substantive policy change can be established.

2
Under discussion · En discusión
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

proposal text availability and legacy resource recovery · Version 2 replaces the hidden undiscussed-version placeholder with a substantive Spanish proposal covering minimum requirements for legacy resources and possible recovery when resources are unused, unannounced, or cannot be verified.

2
Rejected · Did not reach consensus
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

language and editorial presentation · Version 2 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish with minor wording changes; the supplied evidence preserves the same subject of minimum requirements and possible recovery.

3
Under discussion · En discusión
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

language and editorial presentation · Version 3 presents the same legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish and makes limited wording changes around Board authority and service conditions; the supplied text retains the same recovery and compliance subject.

3
Rejected · Did not reach consensus
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

language and editorial presentation · Version 3 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English rather than Spanish with minor wording changes; no separate substantive policy mechanism is visible beyond the same compliance and recovery framework.

4
Under discussion · En discusión
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

Board fee wording · Version 4 keeps the legacy-resource recovery proposal and makes a limited wording clarification that the Board may, for example, establish an alternative fee; no different recovery mechanism is introduced in the retained text.

4
Rejected · Did not reach consensus
Jun 30, 2026
Source facts ↗

Board authority and service conditions · Version 4 presents the retained legacy-resource proposal in English and clarifies Board-of-Directors authority and access to services; the compliance conditions and possible recovery mechanism remain the same in the supplied text.

Debate timeline

  1. Introduced

    Introduced

    Source facts ↗
  2. Official version

    1

    Under discussion · En discusión

    Source facts ↗
  3. Official version

    1

    Rejected · Did not reach consensus

    Source facts ↗
  4. Official version

    2

    Under discussion · En discusión

    Source facts ↗
  5. Official version

    2

    Rejected · Did not reach consensus

    Source facts ↗
  6. Official version

    3

    Under discussion · En discusión

    Source facts ↗
  7. Official version

    3

    Rejected · Did not reach consensus

    Source facts ↗
  8. Official version

    4

    Under discussion · En discusión

    Source facts ↗
  9. Official version

    4

    Rejected · Did not reach consensus

    Source facts ↗
  10. Official decision

    rejected

    rejected

    Source facts ↗

Entities

Last updated:

Loading

Sources and coverage

Public discussion archives

Coverage

Earliest captured: Oct 21, 1999
Latest captured: Nov 15, 2026