Summary

  • GAO found 119 of 462 major rules issued during the four years ending January 2025 had stated effective dates inconsistent with the Congressional Review Act’s 60-day delay, without an applicable exception claim. Forty-three allowed fewer than 30 days; Congress received some after their stated effective dates.
  • The clock starts at the later of Federal Register publication and congressional receipt. Agencies must set an effective date before they reliably know when Congress will count a paper submission as received. HHS sometimes starts from public inspection, before official publication.
  • Congress can define a usable receipt event. HHS can date from publication, while DOE and Treasury can use a 75-day publication buffer where feasible. The 119 are a timing finding, not a tally of overturned rules.

A deadline with two starting pistols

The Congressional Review Act asks a simple question of a major rule: when may it take effect? Its answer contains a trap. The agency must wait 60 days from the later of official Federal Register publication or receipt by Congress. The House and Senate both require paper copies. An executive agency must write an effective date before the congressional paper trail has finished moving. If that trail slips, the date printed in the rule stays put while the statutory clock starts later.

GAO’s April 2026 examination covered 462 major rules issued and submitted in the four years from January 21, 2021, to January 20, 2025. It found 119, about 26%, with stated effective dates inconsistent with the 60-day wait and without an applicable exception claim. Nineteen left 56 to 59 days. Fifty-seven left 30 to 55. Forty-three left fewer than 30. In some of that last group Congress received the rule after its stated effective date. The window did not merely narrow; on paper it could close before the package arrived.

There is a lawful shorter route when an agency claims an exception. GAO separately found 82 rules that did so: 70 invoked good cause and 12 an exception for specified hunting, fishing or camping rules. Two partially exempt rules remained in the 119 because their uncovered portions carried inconsistent dates. Treating every short wait as an evasion would obscure the report’s actual count. The disturbing figure is the number outside those claimed exceptions.

Delivered to the building, received by the institution

The physical route reads like a satire written by a postal clerk. Treasury officials told GAO that carriers sometimes attempted delivery while Capitol buildings were closed. USDA officials said a package left at a required Capitol drop-off location could take weeks to reach the relevant office. Staff at four departments described hand delivery as a workaround. An HHS official said the round trip to the Capitol typically takes an hour for every rule.

Arrival at the complex is not necessarily the date the law uses. House Parliamentarian staff stamp a rule in their office; the Senate Parliamentarian uses publication of its Congressional Record notice for procedural purposes. Agencies have used different working definitions, including the date a package reached a Capitol mailroom or the date an employee handed it to a congressional office. Congress created a review clock and left its starting gun among several desks.

This is more than a quarrel over a timestamp. A rule can take effect while Congress still has power to disapprove it later. The 60 days give legislators a chance to decide before regulated parties spend money to comply and before agencies act under the rule. GAO did not calculate those costs for the 119 rules or pronounce them void. Its finding is narrower and sharp enough: the stated effective date deprived Congress of some or all of the period promised before implementation.

HHS moved a second starting line

The Department of Health and Human Services accounted for 53 of the 119 inconsistent rules, out of 105 major rules it issued. GAO found that HHS sometimes instructed the Office of the Federal Register to count 60 days from public inspection, when a version is displayed for review, rather than from official publication. Public inspection may come days or weeks earlier. The printed effective date can therefore satisfy an internal 60-day calculation while missing the statutory one from publication.

HHS officials pointed to long, complex Medicare payment rules and statutory deadlines. The Office of the Federal Register can take weeks to process them. That constraint is real; the solution of moving the starting line takes time from Congress. GAO reported that a processing pilot begun in June 2025 had reduced average processing times for lengthy rules by August, according to office officials. The agency can use that gained time to set a date from publication, instead of asking the legislature to absorb production delay.

The numerical contrast exposes the problem. Among the four agencies GAO studied closely, USDA, Energy and Treasury gave at least 60 days after publication for 61 of 67 major rules that were published and claimed no exception. HHS did so for 43 of 87. The second congressional-receipt clock could still catch any of them; HHS also shortened the first.

Fifteen extra days buy a buffer, not a definition

The Department of Energy tried a practical patch. Eight of its rules set to take effect 75 or 77 days after publication met the CRA delay. Seven of nine set at 60 or 62 days missed it because congressional receipt came later. GAO calculated that five of those seven would have met the wait with 15 added days. At Treasury, eight of 15 rules set at 60 to 62 days missed; seven of those eight would have met with the same buffer. These are findings from this audit period, not a universal guarantee that 75 days solves every delivery failure.

The main fix belongs to Congress. It can specify a receipt event an agency can know in time to set an effective date, such as delivery to an identified office for each chamber. GAO also recommended that Energy and Treasury adopt a 75-day publication interval where feasible, and that HHS stop using public inspection as its reference point. Those recommendations remained open on GAO’s report page when this article was prepared.

The deeper problem is who owns the interval between an executive decision and legislative review. The agency controls the rule and the date it prints. Congress controls the receipt machinery. Neither currently owns the full clock. A statutory pause becomes a wager on internal delivery. The paper is thick, the chain of custody is elaborate, and the sixty days can disappear between them.

Sources