Summary

  • RIPE records Prime-Service LLC as ORG-PL249-RIPE and records AS200802 as assigned to that organisation; the linked retail site presents the customer-facing name City Telecom Service in Krymsk.
  • The operator’s tariff page displayed the same promotional prices for entry and professional GPON and WiMAX tiers, even though the advertised speeds were 100 or 300 Mbps on GPON and 10 or 16 Mbps on WiMAX.
  • Four /24 IPv4 prefixes and two observed neighbouring networks establish a bounded routing footprint. They do not prove address-level availability, physical diversity, congestion performance or restoration capability.
  • Buyers should verify the access method at the premises, installation and equipment terms, migration options and repair responsibility before comparing packages by name or price.

At the time of review, an entry tariff on the operator’s tariff page displayed a promotional price of 850 rubles per 30 days whether the access method was GPON or WiMAX. Yet the advertised rate was 100 Mbps for the GPON offer and 10 Mbps for the WiMAX offer. The professional tier repeated the pattern: 1,050 rubles promotional, with 300 Mbps shown for GPON and 16 Mbps for WiMAX. The page also listed 500 Mbps GPON offers, while its wireless table stopped at 16 Mbps.

Those numbers are an operator-authored snapshot, not a universal quotation. They may change, and the page does not show that every technology is available at every address. Even so, the comparison exposes a basic regional-access reality: a tariff name and monthly price can conceal very different technical futures. Fibre entering a building can support a different upgrade path from a long-distance wireless link. The practical product is therefore not only a nominal speed. It includes the access technology that can actually be installed, the equipment placed at the premises, the route to an upgrade and the team responsible when that path fails.

The public identity requires similar care. The RIPE member entry and organisation record name Prime-Service LLC at Fadeeva 64/1 in Krymsk. The AS record assigns AS200802, with AS name PSVS, to that organisation. The p-svs.ru site uses the customer-facing name City Telecom Service, lists the same street address and a p-svs.ru email address, and says it serves the Krymsk and Abinsk districts. Its about page also names a sole proprietor. Shared address and contact evidence connects the records operationally, but it does not by itself settle which legal person signs each contract, owns each asset or carries each remedy.

The routing view is useful but narrower. RIPEstat showed four /24s—185.95.104.0/24 through 185.95.107.0/24—announced by AS200802 throughout the returned 22 August to 5 September 2026 window. Its neighbour view showed AS20485 and AS8359 on the left side at 00:00 UTC on 5 September. The routing-consistency result marked all four prefixes as present both in BGP and RIPE IRR, while the observed neighbour relationships were not represented in the returned WHOIS import/export policy.

None of that is a service-level record. Two visible upstream ASes can still share a regional exit, duct, building, power source or operating team. Four visible prefixes say nothing about busy-hour contention or the time needed to replace a failed radio, optical terminal or cable. The mismatch between observed routing and published policy is a documentation question, not evidence of misconduct or instability.

For a household or small business, the decisive diligence begins at the address. Which technology will be delivered? Is the quoted speed a maximum or a committed rate? Who owns the optical terminal or wireless equipment? What installation work and fees apply? Can a WiMAX customer migrate to GPON, under what trigger and at what cost? Which party accepts a fault, dispatches a technician and supplies replacement equipment? The public site promotes quick connection and technical support, but it does not publish the address-level answers or measured restoration history needed to compare those claims.

Prime-Service’s tariff table is valuable because it makes the hidden choice visible. The same displayed bill does not necessarily purchase the same capacity ceiling, upgrade option or failure surface. Price comparison becomes meaningful only after the access path and its operating responsibilities are named.

Sources

City Telecom Service; about; tariffs; contacts; RIPE member record; RIPE organisation; RIPE AS200802; RIPEstat prefixes; RIPEstat neighbours; RIPEstat routing consistency.