AFRINIC · RIR Watchdog
Story
BTW reporting and context linked to this RIR. For the proposal-by-proposal history, the people involved and their changing positions, start with Policy.
Story
Latest stories
1,179Stories
Story
AFRINIC’s petition proposal needs a receipt for every step from Board silence to implementation
AFRINIC’s Draft01 responds to a real institutional failure: a registry cannot leave policy work frozen whenever its Board cannot act. But its alternative route—from fifteen supporters to a new staff analysis and then deemed ratification—still lacks the evidence controls that…
Story
AFRINIC Has Rebuilt GovCom. Its Advice Still Needs a Public Return Path
AFRINIC’s 17 August announcement names a complete Governance Committee with elected, Board-appointed and non-voting entities. The next accountability test is not who occupies each chair, but whether every formal request, opinion, dissent and institutional response leaves a trace…
Story
AFRINIC promises a validation meeting before the bylaws vote; the method is the test
The BRC must hold a stakeholder-validation meeting before constitutional amendments reach an AGMM or SGMM. Unless the method is public, “validated” will describe an event without proving what it tested.
Story
AFRINIC’s bylaws committee can recommend; the Board controls the gate to members
The consultation has ended, but consultation is not authority. AFRINIC’s own rules place the decisive pre-member gate with the institution that appointed the review committee.
Story
AFRINIC consultation closes; the response ledger is the next test
The endpoint has expired. AFRINIC’s committee rules now point to one accountability test: show what came in and how each item was handled.
Story
AFRINIC's “all legal costs” resolution still lacks closure
A 2022 Board record explains the urgent defence. It does not show how the unlimited-looking undertaking was classified, spent or closed.
Story
AFRINIC Took Identity Proofing to Kigali. The Registry Handoff Needs a Receipt
A government ID can cross a conference desk in seconds. A registry change must remain explainable long after the badge, booth and meeting room have disappeared. AFRINIC's AfPIF service offer joined those two moments; the missing public entity is the receipt that keeps them…
Story
AFRINIC promises representation before publishing the method
An open, anonymous consultation may find useful priorities. It cannot become evidence of member consent merely because the response count grows.
Story
The second consultation placed Board review before a future SGMM vote
AFRINIC’s 4 August announcement described a careful sequence for moving constitutional text from public comments to committee revision, independent legal scrutiny, Board review and, only if the Board allowed the proposal to advance, later consideration by members. The important…
Story
AFRINIC appeal panel remains unnamed after deadline
AFRINIC sought nominees for three seats on a five-member appeals panel. Ten days after the deadline, its live page still published no current members.
Story
AFRINIC says GovCom is ready, but its term clock is not
AFRINIC published the committee’s names and end dates. Without start dates, its one-year Board liaison cap and the 2026 transition remain unverified.
Story
AFRINIC removes a nationality bar—but leaves its replacement gate without a record
The August consultation ended with a genuine reform still attached to an unfinished procedure: Mauritian candidates would no longer be excluded by passport, yet the Board could decide who never reaches the CEO’s office without the draft guaranteeing notice, reasons, recusal or…
Story
AFRINIC's Survey Can Count Replies. It Cannot Count Representation Yet
A response box can fill quickly and still leave the room outside it invisible. AFRINIC's new member and stakeholder survey may produce useful service evidence, but its eventual weight will depend on a record the launch has not yet supplied: who could answer, who was reached, what…
Story
AFRINIC Draft 2 Can Waive 90%; “Sufficiently Documented” Has No Fields
AFRINIC recorded the second-data-centre trap in 2018. An End User wanted another `/24` for redundancy, had used less than 90% of its existing space and was therefore ineligible. Draft 2 finally names that class of problem, then leaves the proof inside two words: sufficiently…
Story
AFRINIC's First Article 24 Text Now Needs Its Own Review
The deadline passed at 23:59 UTC. In the 53-page constitutional draft still linked the next day, Article 24 had a heading, a number and a promise to add the law and dispute route later—but no clause for entities to review.
Story
AFRINIC's New Committee Has Five Votes and Three Expiry Dates
AFRINIC has filled a governance body with five voting members chosen through two different routes. The more important design feature may be the calendar: its seats do not all expire together, and its advice cannot bind the people who receive it.
Story
AFRINIC's Certificate Deadline Split Into Four Clocks
The 18 August notice described one cutoff. Operations produced four different clocks: the announced date, the upstream source, the portable release and the validator runs that networks could actually observe. They did not strike together.
Story
Resolution 201804.407 Renewed the CEO Contract Before Final KPIs and Performance Evaluation
AFRINIC’s Board approved a three-year renewal on the same employment terms at a special meeting on 19 April 2018, even as its own resolution deferred finalising the chief executive’s KPIs and performance evaluation until May. The surviving sequence supports a precise governance…
Story
AFRINIC’s Interim Management Committee Was Given Six Months. Who Renewed It?
AFRINIC gave three senior employees collective responsibility for day-to-day management during its CEO vacancy and said the arrangement would last six months or until a new chief executive arrived. The announcement was public; the full authority chain was not. Using the…
Story
Eight elected seats in one notice: what AFRINIC’s 12 September result proves
AFRINIC’s brief announcement did something institutionally significant: it named an occupant for every member-elected Board seat in a single exceptional reconstitution cycle. Yet the notice remains a declaration, not a complete result receipt. Its evidentiary value becomes clear…