Skip to main content

AFRINIC · RIR Watchdog

Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region

Start here for the proposal-by-proposal record: what changed, why it mattered, who argued for what, how positions evolved, what was decided, and where the evidence still has gaps.

Source facts

Policy ID
AFPUB-2014-GEN-003
RIR
AFRINIC
Official status
Implemented
Normalized status
Accepted
Introduced
Unknown
Last source update
Oct 12, 2026
Coverage
Partial

Who actually shaped the debate?

19Total participants
19Discussion contributors
UnknownFormal actors
46Discussion messages
13.6Effective participants
50%Top-five discussion share
5People covering 50%
10People covering 80%

BTW Analysis

BTW Analysis

What changed

No policy change can be established from the supplied verified facts because the policy chronology is empty and no proposal text, amendment sequence, procedural milestone, or implementation record is provided.

What the debate was really about

The substance of the debate cannot be reconstructed. No messages, participants, stance timelines, arguments, proposals, interests, or institutional incentives are recorded in the supplied dataset.

Decision vs debate

Neither a discussion outcome nor a formal decision is established. The snapshot records zero messages, zero discussion participants, zero formal actors, zero active days, and no adoption, rejection, withdrawal, consensus, ratification, or implementation record.

Participation concentration

The zero top-message shares, HHI, effective-participant count, and core-participant counts describe an empty observed population, not broadly distributed participation. With zero messages and zero participants, concentration cannot be meaningfully assessed.

Chokepoint analysis

No procedural, institutional, or participant chokepoint can be identified because the supplied chronology and stance timelines are empty and the participation snapshot records no discussion or formal-actor activity.

Uncertainties

  • Zero values may mean that no qualifying activity occurred, that source extraction found no qualifying records, or that relevant activity occurred outside the measured dataset.
  • The concentration statistics cannot distinguish broad equality from absence of participation when both message and participant counts are zero.
  • The policy's evolution and decision outcome are unknown because no chronology, policy text, or decision record is supplied.
  • The current version-bound Doctrine authority does not establish a complete official position for this policy subject.

Policy evolution

Debate timeline

  1. Official version

    DRAFT-02

    Accepted · Implemented

    Source facts ↗
  2. Public discussion

    [rpd] New proposal - "Mandatory requirements for registering assignments and sub-allocations" (AFPUB-2014-GEN-003-DRAFT-01)

    11 Discussion messages · 9 Entities

    Source facts ↗
  3. Public discussion

    [rpd] RE: rpd Digest, Vol 96, Issue 37

    2 Discussion messages · 2 Entities

    Source facts ↗
  4. Public discussion

    [rpd] AnyCast assignments - Update

    19 Discussion messages · 11 Entities

    Source facts ↗
  5. Public discussion

    [rpd] "Anycast Assignments in the AFRINIC region" last call

    2 Discussion messages · 2 Entities

    Source facts ↗
  6. Public discussion

    [rpd] Anycast allocations and current policy

    2 Discussion messages · 2 Entities

    Source facts ↗

Entities

Freshness: Stale
  1. Discussion messages5
    First activityOct 3, 2014
    Last activityDec 12, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyConsistent
    Other policies10
    Freshness: Stale

    Last research attempt: Oct 4, 2026

    Identity verified: Oct 4, 2026

    POSIX · Historical
    Author(s): Jordi Palet Martinez jordi.palet[at]theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company Frank Habicht geier[at]geier.ne.tz Tanzania ISP Association Mark Elkins mje[at]posix.co.za POSIX
    www.afrinic.net
    Discussion messages
    5
    First activity
    Oct 3, 2014
    Last activity
    Dec 12, 2014
    First explicit stance
    Support with changes
    Latest explicit stance
    Support with changes
    Stance changes
    0
    Viewpoint consistency
    Consistent
    Other policies
    10

    First explicit stance: Support with changes → Latest explicit stance: Support with changes · Stance changes: 0

    Viewpoint consistency: Consistent

    The October and December 2014 anycast contributions follow a coherent line: extend access to IPv6 and AS Numbers, then clarify the technical uses and references. The separate question about foreign companies operating in Africa does not establish a vote on out-of-region limits or a reversal of that position.

    AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01

    Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The submitted text advocates extending the existing anycast policy to IPv6 and AS Numbers. This one submission establishes that proposal, but cannot by itself establish persistence or reversal over time.

    Conditions: Authorship and proposed text are distinguished from adoption or community consensus. · The stated geographic rationale concerns legitimate members supporting their networks; it is not unlimited permission for every applicant.

    The proposal modifies AFPUB-2012-V4-001 to include the option to request IPv6 space and AS Numbers for anycast purposes from AFRINIC and for AFRINIC to issue these resources to the requestors.

    Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region

    Assessment: Consistent · The proposed addition of BCP169 and subsequent support for Alan's successor-reference wording are compatible steps toward clearer technical references. The later response endorses an update rather than withdrawing the earlier anycast-use objective.

    Conditions: The exact text of Alan's intervening suggestion is not reproduced in these two messages. · The expectation that the change satisfies everyone is the author's expectation, not a formal consensus decision.

    These resources must be used for the sole purposes of providing anycast services or GRX (GPRS Roaming Exchanges) as recommended in BCP126 and BCP169.

    Thanks Alan. I like that. Ernest - can you please update the current online wording to reflect what Alan says.

    Out-Of-Region Use of AFRINIC Internet Number Resources

    Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The question challenges a possible exclusion of foreign companies that operate in Africa. It does not supply an explicit position on the full out-of-region proposal or a second position to compare.

    Conditions: A question about company origin must not be converted into support for unrestricted use outside Africa.

    If a non African company moves into Africa - why would the policy not allow them IPv4 address space?

    AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region

    Assessment: Consistent · The extension submitted in October and the December reference edits share the same purpose: make IPv6 and AS Numbers available for specified anycast or GRX uses. Refining the technical references does not contradict that purpose.

    Conditions: This comparison concerns the author's submitted and proposed wording, not whether either proposal was adopted.

    This proposal allows an organization to receive an IPv4/IPv6 allocation or assignment and an AS Number purely for anycast or GPRS Roaming Exchange (GRX) usage.

    This proposal allows an organization to receive an IPv4/IPv6 allocation or assignment and/or an AS Number purely for anycast or GPRS Roaming Exchange (GRX) usage in line with the provisions of BCP126 and BCP169.

    AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01 · Out-Of-Region Use of AFRINIC Internet Number Resources

    Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The anycast text discusses regional members' operations regardless of physical location, while the out-of-region question asks about foreign companies operating inside Africa. Those are different eligibility dimensions; these messages do not establish contradictory rules or a complete shared position.

    Conditions: Distinguish a company's origin, membership eligibility and the physical use of its resources.

    number resources allocated/assigned by AFRINIC are used by legitimate members from the service region to support their network operations, regardless of physical location.

    If a non African company moves into Africa - why would the policy not allow them IPv4 address space?

    1. Oct 3, 2014 · Unknown

      [rpd] New proposal - "Mandatory requirements for registering assignments and sub-allocations" (AFPUB-2014-GEN-003-DRAFT-01)

      Validated evidence is unavailable.

      Source facts ↗
    2. Nov 4, 2014 · Unknown

      [rpd] AnyCast assignments - Update

      Validated evidence is unavailable.

      Source facts ↗
    3. Nov 18, 2014 · Unknown

      [rpd] AnyCast assignments - Update

      Validated evidence is unavailable.

      Source facts ↗
    4. Dec 8, 2014 · Support with changes

      [rpd] AnyCast assignments - Update

      I see this as a minor edit.

      Source facts ↗
    5. Dec 12, 2014 · Support with changes

      [rpd] AnyCast assignments - Update

      Thanks Alan. I like that.

      Source facts ↗

    Total policy messages: 36

  2. Discussion messages5
    First activityMay 18, 2014
    Last activityDec 3, 2014
    First explicit stanceOppose
    Latest explicit stanceOppose
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo validated consistency assessment
    Other policies16
  3. Discussion messages5
    First activitySep 30, 2014
    Last activityDec 9, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Stance changes2
    Viewpoint consistencyNo validated consistency assessment
    Other policies4
  4. Discussion messages4
    First activitySep 26, 2014
    Last activityFeb 8, 2015
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyInsufficient evidence to assess consistency
    Other policies13
  5. Adam Nelson · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages4
    First activityNov 7, 2014
    Last activityFeb 8, 2015
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyInsufficient evidence to assess consistency
    Other policies4
  6. Jean Robert Hountomey · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages3
    First activitySep 27, 2014
    Last activityOct 17, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies1
  7. Discussion messages3
    First activitySep 26, 2014
    Last activityDec 7, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport
    Stance changes1
    Viewpoint consistencyConsistent
    Other policies8
  8. Frank Habicht · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages3
    First activitySep 27, 2014
    Last activityDec 12, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo validated consistency assessment
    Other policies5
  9. Discussion messages3
    First activitySep 27, 2014
    Last activityFeb 12, 2015
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyInsufficient evidence to assess consistency
    Other policies6
  10. Badru Ntege · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages2
    First activitySep 19, 2014
    Last activitySep 19, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies1
  11. Discussion messages1
    First activityNov 28, 2014
    Last activityNov 28, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies10
  12. Dr Paulos Nyirenda · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activitySep 26, 2014
    Last activitySep 26, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies4
  13. Unknown · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activityDec 12, 2014
    Last activityDec 12, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyInsufficient evidence to assess consistency
    Other policies1
  14. David Peall · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activityDec 3, 2014
    Last activityDec 3, 2014
    First explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Latest explicit stanceSupport with changes
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyInsufficient evidence to assess consistency
    Other policies0
  15. Fiona Asonga · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activityOct 3, 2014
    Last activityOct 3, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies3
  16. Sunday Folayan · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activityJun 17, 2014
    Last activityJun 17, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies6
  17. Akeem MUFUTAU · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activitySep 27, 2014
    Last activitySep 27, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies0
  18. Mark Tinka · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activityNov 4, 2014
    Last activityNov 4, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies2
  19. Ebo Thompson · Identity unresolved
    Discussion messages1
    First activitySep 27, 2014
    Last activitySep 27, 2014
    First explicit stanceUnknown
    Latest explicit stanceUnknown
    Stance changes0
    Viewpoint consistencyNo explicit position stated
    Other policies0

Sources and coverage

Official policy sources

Public discussion archives

  • afrinic-rpd
    Earliest captured
    Aug 4, 2004
    Latest captured
    Aug 25, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    13,116
    Known gaps
    0
  • www.afrinic.net
  • afrinic-africann
    Earliest captured
    Aug 3, 2026
    Latest captured
    Oct 2, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    2,625
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-afripv6-discuss
    Earliest captured
    Aug 17, 2015
    Latest captured
    Sep 18, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    2,538
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-announce
    Earliest captured
    Aug 18, 2015
    Latest captured
    Sep 18, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    2,497
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-community-discuss
    Earliest captured
    Sep 11, 2015
    Latest captured
    Dec 29, 2019
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    3,127
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-dbwg
    Earliest captured
    Aug 4, 2026
    Latest captured
    Oct 6, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    966
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-dnssec-ops
    Earliest captured
    Aug 18, 2015
    Latest captured
    Dec 1, 2016
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    307
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-icp2-review
    Earliest captured
    Apr 10, 2025
    Latest captured
    Nov 10, 2025
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    0
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-measurement-wg
    Earliest captured
    Feb 1, 2018
    Latest captured
    Nov 22, 2024
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    138
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-mira
    Earliest captured
    Nov 17, 2020
    Latest captured
    Nov 22, 2024
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    0
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-ois-wg
    Earliest captured
    Sep 9, 2021
    Latest captured
    Nov 22, 2024
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    0
    Known gaps
    0
  • afrinic-rpki-discuss
    Earliest captured
    Jan 15, 2016
    Latest captured
    Apr 23, 2026
    Last refresh
    Oct 15, 2026
    Coverage
    Source coverage is incomplete.
    Loading
    154
    Known gaps
    0

Coverage

Partial
Earliest captured: Aug 4, 2004
Latest captured: Oct 15, 2026

Freshness

Freshness: Stale · Last refresh:

Known gaps

  • www.afrinic.net: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • www.afrinic.net: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-rpd: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • www.afrinic.net: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-africann: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-afripv6-discuss: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-announce: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-community-discuss: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-dbwg: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-dnssec-ops: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-measurement-wg: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.
  • afrinic-rpki-discuss: Source coverage is incomplete. · The source boundary has not yet been reached.