Person profile
PersonPublic policy participant
The available evidence covers Roles: CTO (LACNIC).
Source description Public policy participant
Carlos Martínez-Cagnazzo es el Gerente de Área Técnica de LACNIC
public people profile
Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3011 at gmail.com
public people profile
Last updated: 2026-10-18
Source facts
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
He explains that a terminology change should be made to the Spanish original because origin AS is standard English terminology. This single wording intervention does not establish endorsement of the full proposal or a change of position.
Inclusion of ASN in the whois when available
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He explains that a terminology change should be made to the Spanish original because origin AS is standard English terminology. This single wording intervention does not establish endorsement of the full proposal or a change of position.
Conditions: The evidence belongs to the 2010 proposal, not the later 2021 policy.
Christian, el original era en espa?ol, "origin AS" fue el producto de la traducci?n de "AS de origen". En todo caso debemos proponer el cambio del texto original, ya que la traducci?n al ingl?s usa el "origin AS" que en cualquier caso es la terminolog?a normalmente utilizada. saludos Carlos 2010/11/30 Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty at gmail.com>:
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
The statement that /24 prefixes generally route successfully answers a technical feasibility question. It does not, by itself, express support for inter-RIR transfers or provide a second position against which consistency can be assessed.
Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The statement that /24 prefixes generally route successfully answers a technical feasibility question. It does not, by itself, express support for inter-RIR transfers or provide a second position against which consistency can be assessed.
Conditions: Do not infer a policy endorsement from this routing observation.
Los /24 se rutean bien, en general no hay problemas.
Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers · Modification to the text describing ASN distribution requirements
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The routing feasibility of /24 prefixes and the resource-scarcity distinction between IPv4 and ASNs concern different technical questions. They are not opposing policy commitments, and the transfer message supplies no explicit endorsement to compare.
Conditions: No contradiction is established; equally, these excerpts do not establish a comprehensive cross-policy position.
Los /24 se rutean bien, en general no hay problemas.
sin hablar a favor o en contra, solo quer?a recordar, sobre todo para los que hace menos tiempo que est?n en la discusi?n de pol?ticas, que estamos ya desde hace un tiempo asignando sistemas aut?nomos de 32 bits. Adem?s, nuestra regi?n tiene una tasa de devoluci?n (es decir, miembros que vienen a pedir un cambio de un AS de 32 bits por un AS de 16 bits) muy muy baja. Por ello el n?mero de ASN no es un recurso 'escaso', no m?s de lo que lo es IPv6 por ejemplo :-)
Viewpoint consistency: Consistent
Both messages argue that ASN criteria should not be driven by an assumed scarcity of 32-bit ASNs, while explicitly distinguishing the scarcity of IPv4. The first message also says he is not speaking for or against the proposal.
Modification to the text describing ASN distribution requirements
Assessment: Consistent · Both messages argue that ASN criteria should not be driven by an assumed scarcity of 32-bit ASNs, while explicitly distinguishing the scarcity of IPv4. The first message also says he is not speaking for or against the proposal.
Conditions: This finding concerns consistency of his technical reasoning, not a recorded vote or endorsement.
sin hablar a favor o en contra, solo quer?a recordar, sobre todo para los que hace menos tiempo que est?n en la discusi?n de pol?ticas, que estamos ya desde hace un tiempo asignando sistemas aut?nomos de 32 bits. Adem?s, nuestra regi?n tiene una tasa de devoluci?n (es decir, miembros que vienen a pedir un cambio de un AS de 32 bits por un AS de 16 bits) muy muy baja. Por ello el n?mero de ASN no es un recurso 'escaso', no m?s de lo que lo es IPv6 por ejemplo :-)
Larry, el caso de IPv4 es fundamentalmente diferente al de los ASNs. A eso iba con mi mensaje de que los criterios que se decidan no debieran estar asociados a una percepci?n de escasez. El caso de IPv4 est? condicionado por la escasez. s2 Carlos
Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers · Modification to the text describing ASN distribution requirements
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The routing feasibility of /24 prefixes and the resource-scarcity distinction between IPv4 and ASNs concern different technical questions. They are not opposing policy commitments, and the transfer message supplies no explicit endorsement to compare.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
One message explains that the file contains direct LACNIC allocations but excludes members' sub-allocations. The other is a short agreement whose referent is not established in the supplied author-only text. These fragments do not establish a comparable policy position.
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · One message explains that the file contains direct LACNIC allocations but excludes members' sub-allocations. The other is a short agreement whose referent is not established in the supplied author-only text. These fragments do not establish a comparable policy position.
Conditions: The short agreement requires its surrounding exchange before a more specific interpretation is justified.
Edmundo, este archivo solo contiene las asignaciones realizadas directamente por LACNIC, no contiene las sub-asignaciones registradas por asociados. s2 Carlos
Si, hay casos relativamente frecuentes de eso.
Larry, el caso de IPv4 es fundamentalmente diferente al de los ASNs. A eso iba con mi mensaje de que los criterios que se decidan no debieran estar asociados a una percepci?n de escasez. El caso de IPv4 est? condicionado por la escasez. s2 Carlos
Conditions: No contradiction is established; equally, these excerpts do not establish a comprehensive cross-policy position.
Los /24 se rutean bien, en general no hay problemas.
sin hablar a favor o en contra, solo quer?a recordar, sobre todo para los que hace menos tiempo que est?n en la discusi?n de pol?ticas, que estamos ya desde hace un tiempo asignando sistemas aut?nomos de 32 bits. Adem?s, nuestra regi?n tiene una tasa de devoluci?n (es decir, miembros que vienen a pedir un cambio de un AS de 32 bits por un AS de 16 bits) muy muy baja. Por ello el n?mero de ASN no es un recurso 'escaso', no m?s de lo que lo es IPv6 por ejemplo :-)
Larry, el caso de IPv4 es fundamentalmente diferente al de los ASNs. A eso iba con mi mensaje de que los criterios que se decidan no debieran estar asociados a una percepci?n de escasez. El caso de IPv4 est? condicionado por la escasez. s2 Carlos
