Skip to main content

Company profiling / Global Cloud Services

ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre: peer relationship

Public relationship material links ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. and Asia Pacific Network Information Centre through a peer network relationship.

Sources

Public references used for this article.

  • publicdata.caida.orgthe peer relationship evidence for LINK AMERICAN - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre peer relationship across AS1000 and AS10111. (source risk: low risk)
  • publicdata.caida.orgthe peer relationship evidence for BroadbandONE, LLC - TowardEX Technologies International, Inc. peer relationship across AS19151 and AS27552. (source risk: low risk)
Category
Company

Public relationship material links ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. and Asia Pacific Network Information Centre through a peer network relationship.

Impact
Medium

Changes in registry, routing, service footprint, or public role can alter visibility, dependency assessment, and escalation paths for infrastructure readers.

Confidence
Confidence score guide
Good confidence (84%)

Several public sources

A visible network relationship can change how readers understand counterparties, dependency, exposure, or market structure across internet infrastructure.

ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre: peer relationship

The ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre peer relationship appears on publicdata.caida.org (public_as_relationship_dataset) with a visible network relationship context. The public relationship material links ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. and Asia Pacific Network Information Centre through a peer network relationship. The profile explains what is visible now and what would change the assessment.

Why it matters

The ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre peer relationship matters because infrastructure decisions depend on knowing which organizations or people appear on the routing, registry, service, or governance map. The profile gives readers a bounded view of identity, visible operational role, and facts that could change the assessment.

What the sources show

The available material establishes the reference identity and operational context of the ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre peer relationship. Registry, routing, official, or operator-published material may show visibility in the internet ecosystem; claims of ownership, client, or decision authority still need corroboration.

The ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre peer relationship appears in public evidence as a network relationship within the internet infrastructure ecosystem. An ASN or prefix sample is not yet attached; the current material establishes identity, registry, or affiliation context. Contact coverage includes 0 operational channels that can help readers understand escalation paths.

The public record is useful where it shows presence in registries, routing or service footprint, operator-published channels, and official source material. The article does not infer contracts from those signals. Its value is to identify the organization's visible operational surface and future events that would confirm or change relationship claims.

Operational surface

The public relationship material links ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. and Asia Pacific Network Information Centre through a peer network relationship.

An ASN or prefix sample is not yet attached; the current material establishes identity, registry, or affiliation context. Contact coverage includes 0 operational channels that can help readers understand escalation paths.

The impact mechanism is how changes in registry, routing, service, or relationship can alter accountability, reachability, escalation, or dependency assessments. The primary subject is Company; network identifiers and registries provide context for the primary subject.

Watchpoints

Watch for changes in source freshness, footprint expansion or withdrawal, contact rotation, and disagreement between registry facts and operator-published material. Add clearer corroboration before making stronger claims about the relationship or control.

Sources

  • publicdata.caida.org— supports the peer relationship evidence for ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre across AS12735 and AS17639.
  • publicdata.caida.org— supports the peer relationship evidence for ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre across AS12735 and AS17639.

Domain of operation

This entity represents a publicly observed peering relationship between ASTurkNet (AS12735) and APNIC (AS17639), situated within the global internet routing infrastructure.

  • Peering network interconnection: Direct connection between autonomous systems AS12735 (ASTurkNet) and AS17639 (APNIC) to exchange traffic. Evidence basis: cmqecxhx90282i96balmn1asz
  • Global routing footprint: The relationship appears in public BGP data, indicating active routing presence. Evidence basis: cmqecxhx90282i96balmn1asz
  • Infrastructure role: Facilitates internet traffic flow between a Turkish service provider and the Asia-Pacific regional internet registry. Evidence basis: doctrine_context

Timeline

  1. Observed in CAIDA relationship dataset

    The AS relationship serial-1 dataset for May 2026 records this peering.

  2. Observed in CAIDA relationship dataset

    The AS relationship serial-1 dataset for June 2026 records this peering.

At A Glance

  • Name: ASTurkNet TurkNet Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. - Asia Pacific Network Information Centre: peer relationship
  • Base: Global

What It Does

  • public operating records
  • official service pages
  • documented relationships updates

Why it matters

  • Changes in registry, routing, service footprint, or public role can alter visibility, dependency assessment, and escalation paths for infrastructure readers.
  • Operational criticality: Medium
  • Time Horizon: Next quarter

What To Watch

  • official company sources
  • public registries
  • operator-published records
NowMedium priority

Track verified source updates, role changes, and current public evidence.

QuarterMedium policy sensitivity

Changes in registry, routing, service footprint, or public role can alter visibility, dependency assessment, and escalation paths for infrastructure readers.

YearNext quarter outlook

Longer-term relevance depends on verified operating, policy, and relationship changes.

Member Briefing

Deeper Profile Context

Sign in with the right membership level to unlock the full briefing and source notes.

Only for Strategic Circle

Strategic Circle

Open to all readers. Unlock profile briefings after joining and signing in.

Join Strategic Circle

Only for Leadership Alliance

Leadership Alliance

For qualified IP-asset owners and management; sign in to unlock alliance briefings.

Join Leadership Alliance

Public View

BTW assesses this peering relationship as a standard network interconnection between two autonomous systems. It is consistent with normal internet operations and does not present unusual risk or exposure.

Watchpoints

  • Potential changes in routing policy could affect traffic paths between the two networks.
  • APNIC's peering with a commercial ISP may indicate operational dependencies for critical DNS or registry services.
  • Absence of contractual details limits understanding of the relationship's commercial terms.

Caveats

  • Information is derived solely from public BGP and registry data, which may not reflect the full contractual relationship.
  • The relationship is static at the time of observation and may evolve.

FAQ

What is the ASTurkNet-APNIC peer relationship?

It is a direct network interconnection between ASTurkNet (AS12735), a Turkish ISP, and APNIC (AS17639), the Regional Internet Registry for the Asia Pacific, facilitating exchange of internet traffic without transit fees.

Is this peering relationship unusual?

While peering between an RIR and a commercial ISP is not typical, APNIC operates its own network infrastructure for DNS and other services, making such relationships plausible for efficient traffic delivery.

How is this relationship detected?

It is inferred from publicly available BGP routing data and AS relationship datasets provided by sources like CAIDA.

What are the implications of this relationship?

It may affect routing paths and dependencies between Turkish internet users and APNIC services, but without further visibility, specific risk or leverage is unknown.

BackAll Companies