Summary

  • O3 CLOUD SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA LTDA is an active Brazilian limited company opened in August 2024 in Limeira, Sao Paulo, with hosting and data-processing as its principal registered activity.
  • Its strongest public operating evidence is AS274667: Registro.br ties the ASN, an IPv4 /24 and an IPv6 /48 to the exact legal entity, while public routing views show both prefixes originated with valid RPKI status and three observed adjacent networks.
  • The company markets virtualized servers, storage servers, bare metal, dedicated IP addresses and corporate VPNs, and says its data centres are in Sao Paulo state. The reviewed pages do not identify facilities, resilience design, measured availability, recovery results or contractual support targets.
  • Public records also expose an identity boundary: routing directories still point to an older O3 consultancy website and that site names a different CNPJ at the same street address. Buyers should establish which entity contracts, operates, supports and bears liability for each service.

The most persuasive fact about O3 Cloud is not the word “cloud”. It is AS274667.

That autonomous system gives the company an observable place in the Brazilian internet. Registro.br's public records connect AS274667 to O3 CLOUD SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA LTDA and to CNPJ 56.777.698/0001-00. They also associate it with 192.141.160.0/24 and 2801:81:80::/48. The company can therefore be assessed through number resources and routing observations rather than through branding alone.

That distinction matters for a regional infrastructure supplier. A polished site can be assembled quickly; a registered ASN, routed address space, routing contacts and upstream relationships create a more demanding trail. Yet none of those facts says what happens when a customer's database fails at 2am, when a storage snapshot cannot be restored, or when the legal party on the invoice differs from the team handling the incident. O3 Cloud clears the first test of traceability. The next tests are operational.

A young legal entity with a concrete technical role

Casa dos Dados, a public mirror of Brazilian federal company data, reports that O3 CLOUD SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA LTDA opened on August 15, 2024 and remains active. It gives O3 CLOUD as the trade name, Limeira in Sao Paulo state as the registered municipality, and R$1,423,429 as declared capital. The primary activity is data processing, application-service provision and internet hosting; secondary activities include customizable and non-customizable software development and licensing, plus technical support and other IT services.

Those classifications fit the service proposition. They do not prove the capacity, ownership or quality of the infrastructure, but they establish that hosting is part of the entity's declared business rather than an incidental label. The public company record also identifies Vinicius Borgo as an administrator and Jean Pierri de Carvalho Zangerolimo and Luciano Maurizio de Jesus as managing partners as of the source's June 2026 update.

The network record adds a different accountable person. Registro.br identifies Anderson Santiago as the responsible, routing and abuse contact for AS274667. That is not inherently inconsistent: technical and corporate roles often belong to different people. It does mean that a procurement file should connect the roles. The buyer needs to know who can sign the service, who authorises changes, who receives abuse reports, who owns an incident escalation and who can commit the company to a recovery decision.

BTW's directory profile places the organisation in Brazil and classifies its visible service surface as managed network, cloud service, data centre, colocation and hosting. The profile marks those labels as not yet assessed. That is the right starting posture: the directory establishes relevance, while company, registry and routing evidence have to carry the operating argument.

The product boundary is understandable, but not yet measurable

The O3 Cloud website describes a recognisable infrastructure portfolio. It offers virtualized servers, storage servers and bare-metal servers, with dedicated IPv4 or IPv6 addresses and corporate VPNs presented as additional services. The company positions the offer for businesses that want customised infrastructure, data protection and specialist support rather than a purely self-service commodity.

The virtualized-server page explains an ordinary multi-tenant model: several virtual machines share physical hardware while receiving allocated CPU, memory and storage. Suggested workloads include ERP and CRM systems, SQL and NoSQL databases, development environments, APIs, backends, dashboards and software-as-a-service applications. This makes the production task clear. O3 Cloud is proposing to host systems that can become central to finance, operations, customer service and software delivery.

That task creates questions the page does not answer. A buyer needs the hypervisor and patching boundary, host-failure procedure, allocation and overcommit policy, isolation controls, storage architecture and maintenance process. “Allocated” resources are not necessarily reserved resources. “Isolated” virtual machines are not evidence of tested tenant separation. Scaling a VM is useful only if capacity is available, the change is controlled and the application survives it.

The storage-server page describes HDD, SSD or NVMe options; RAID; SMB, NFS, FTP, iSCSI, SAN and NAS protocols; user and group permissions; snapshots; replication; automated backup and possible failover. It recommends the service for corporate file shares, system and database backups, media repositories and web applications. This is a broad set of possible configurations, not a disclosed reference architecture. The words “can use” and “can be configured” are important. They leave the customer responsible for establishing which protections are included in the purchased design.

Storage is where feature lists most easily become false comfort. RAID is not a backup. A snapshot is not a recovery result. Replication can reproduce deletion or corruption. Failover can exist on paper and fail during an actual dependency outage. O3 Cloud's public material gives buyers a sensible checklist, but the evidence must come from a service schedule, architecture diagram, retention policy and witnessed restore test.

The bare-metal page offers physical hardware for a single customer or application, aimed at high-performance computing, large databases, games, streaming and security appliances. The absence of a virtualization layer can improve control and predictability, but it moves other responsibilities into view: hardware replacement times, spare-parts availability, remote hands, firmware updates, disk disposal and the recovery path when one machine fails. Public copy about exclusive capacity cannot answer those questions.

O3 Cloud does not publish fixed plans or prices on the reviewed service pages. It asks prospects to request a personalised proposal. That may fit a consultative regional provider, but it makes comparison dependent on disciplined specification. Quotes should state CPU generation, memory, usable storage, network commit, burst rules, IP allocation, backup scope, support hours, service credits, taxes, renewal terms and exit costs. Otherwise a lower monthly price can conceal more customer supervision work.

AS274667 is real evidence, within a narrow boundary

The Registro.br RDAP record is the cleanest link between corporate identity and network identity. It names the exact company and CNPJ as registrant, records Brazil as the country, links the ASN to the IPv4 /24 and IPv6 /48, and provides an administrative and abuse contact under the o3cloud.com.br domain. The ASN was registered in October 2024, soon after the legal entity opened.

Public routing views show that the resources are not merely dormant entries. BGP.tools reports AS274667 as active and allocated under NIC.br, originating one IPv4 and one IPv6 prefix. It marks both routes as RPKI-valid and observes NAVEX TELECOM, GERACAO NET and UPNET PROVEDOR DE ACESSO E TELECOM in the connectivity view. Hurricane Electric's BGP Toolkit independently shows two originated and announced prefixes, 256 originated IPv4 addresses, valid RPKI origin status for both address families and three observed IPv4 and IPv6 peers.

There is useful nuance in the records. BGP.tools labels the IPv6 route with O3 Cloud's name but displays a different organisation description beside the IPv4 prefix, even though Registro.br links that prefix to AS274667 and the exact O3 Cloud registrant. Routing labels can retain historical or partner context. A customer using dedicated addresses should ask O3 Cloud to document allocation authority, route-origin authorisation, reverse DNS, abuse handling and the process for moving addresses at contract end.

IPinfo offers a recent observation rather than a guarantee. It identifies the same /24, classifies the ASN as a business network and shows a June 18, 2026 traceroute from Sao Paulo reaching an address in AS274667. It lists NAVEX and GERACAO NET as upstreams and all three named networks as peers. Different routing collectors can classify the same relationship differently, so the safe conclusion is limited: O3 Cloud has a visible routed footprint with multiple observed external adjacencies. The records do not prove physical path diversity, separate entrances, independent power domains or successful failover.

This is still more informative than a generic hosting claim. RPKI-valid routes reduce one class of route-origin risk. Multiple observed adjacencies are preferable to no visible connectivity evidence. But the buyer must ask whether IPv4 and IPv6 fail together, whether the three paths depend on common local fibre, how route changes are approved, how DDoS events are handled and whether customer services actually use AS274667.

The last question cannot be answered by loading the corporate website. A DNS snapshot during this review resolved o3cloud.com.br through Cloudflare addresses and directed mail to Google infrastructure. That is normal for a public site and email, but it illustrates why domain availability is not service proof. The customer workload, management plane, backup target and corporate communications can each follow different dependency paths.

Locality is a claim that needs an address map

O3 Cloud says its data centres are physically located in Sao Paulo state and presents local storage as supporting low latency, security and compliance with Brazilian law. For a Limeira-area customer, regional facilities and Portuguese-language support could reduce coordination time. Local processing may also simplify a data inventory compared with a service scattered across unknown regions.

The claim remains too broad for a residency decision. The reviewed pages do not name a facility, city, operator, certification, redundancy tier or disaster-recovery site. They do not say whether “data centres” means facilities owned by O3 Cloud, contracted colocation, partner infrastructure or a mixture. Nor do they locate snapshots, replicas, support tools, monitoring data or administrative access.

LGPD compliance cannot be inferred from a state boundary. It depends on purpose, authority, security, retention, access, processors and the handling of data-subject rights. A useful locality schedule would map primary compute, primary storage, backups, logs, support access, subprocessors and recovery copies. It would also state how O3 Cloud proves deletion or returns data when a customer leaves.

The portfolio makes this especially important. The “other services” page markets fixed IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, BGP routing, DDoS protection, private VLAN compatibility, managed firewalls and VPN access with audit logs. Each feature crosses a control boundary. Who administers the firewall? Who can retrieve VPN logs? Are logs tamper-resistant? Does DDoS protection sit with O3 Cloud or an upstream? Which party reports an incident? Those details determine whether locality produces control or merely a nearby dependency.

The two O3 identities deserve a contractual answer

The most consequential public ambiguity concerns continuity. BGP.tools and Hurricane Electric both associate AS274667 with o3consultoria.com.br. That site identifies itself as O3 Solucoes em T.I, displays CNPJ 14.727.262/0001-67 and gives the same Limeira street address reported for O3 Cloud's newer CNPJ. It markets infrastructure, cloud, firewall and support services and makes a 99.9 per cent availability statement.

There are plausible explanations: the newer entity may be a specialised cloud business, a successor vehicle, an affiliate or a separation of activities within one operating group. The reviewed sources do not establish which explanation is correct. Shared address and branding are evidence of proximity, not proof of ownership, asset transfer, guarantee or contractual continuity.

That gap is manageable if it is addressed directly. A buyer should ask which CNPJ owns or leases the hardware, which one holds facility and transit contracts, which one employs or contracts the support team, which one invoices the customer and whether either entity guarantees the other's obligations. Existing customers migrating from an older O3 agreement should also confirm whether service histories, credits, data-processing terms and liabilities carried over.

Identity clarity matters during ordinary operations, but it matters more during failure. An engineer may know how to restore a server while lacking authority to approve compensation. A sales contact may promise migration help while a different company controls the rack or address space. The public network record correctly points to the newer O3 Cloud entity; the surrounding web history means the contract should explain the rest.

Support should be tested as part of the infrastructure

O3 Cloud publishes a telephone number, WhatsApp channel, email address and web form. Its positioning emphasises close, technical and human support. These are useful local entry points, particularly for businesses that do not want to navigate a hyperscaler's queue during an incident.

The reviewed site does not publish a status page, incident archive, support timetable, severity matrix, ticket response target or escalation ladder. It also does not expose customer evidence about recovery performance. Absence from public pages does not mean those controls do not exist; it means the procurement process has to obtain and test them.

A practical trial should cover the full operating loop. Provision a representative VM. Apply identity and firewall rules. Move a non-critical application. Generate monitoring alerts. Restore data to an isolated location. Request a route or reverse-DNS change. Open tickets at ordinary and urgent severities. Ask for the timestamps, approvals and post-incident record. Then test export and deletion before the trial ends.

The comparison with hyperscale, colocation or self-run infrastructure should include labour. A regional provider may reduce architecture, migration and incident-response effort through direct support. It may also create dependence on a small group of people and bespoke procedures. The relevant measures are not only monthly cost and advertised availability, but support response, recovery time, change failure rate, restore success, egress effort and the hours the customer's own team must spend supervising the service.

O3 Cloud's public record supports a bounded conclusion. It is an active Brazilian company with a coherent hosting remit, a relevant service portfolio and a real dual-stack network footprint. That is enough to justify diligence and a technical trial. It is not enough to treat availability, locality, security or support as settled facts. The purchase becomes defensible when the company name, ASN, facilities, contracts, controls and people can be drawn on one operating map and tested against one recoverable workload.