AFRINIC · RIR Watchdog
Story
BTW reporting and context linked to this RIR. For the proposal-by-proposal history, the people involved and their changing positions, start with Policy.
Story
Latest stories
1,192Stories
Story
The USD 64,327 question on AFRINIC’s 2012 infrastructure page
Printed page 30 of AFRINIC’s 2012 annual report asks a reader to hold two infrastructure figures at once. Its narrative says approximately USD 309,000 was spent on infrastructure during the year, while a table on the same page reports USD 244,673 as “Reinvestment in…
Story
What AFRINIC’s 2012 Cost Jump Proves—and What It Does Not
AFRINIC’s reported operating expenses climbed by nearly a third in one year, with staffing the largest visible driver. The arithmetic is clear; the public chain connecting the approved budget, recorded categories, individual commitments and accepted results is not.
Story
AFRINIC’s first reported deficit: the accounts reconcile, the control bridge does not
USD 2,636,032 of membership-fee income plus USD 121,931 of grants, less USD 3,161,186 of operating expenses, plus USD 140,132 of reported other and finance income, equals a deficit of USD 263,091. AFRINIC’s 2012 figures make that result unusually easy to reproduce. What they do…
Story
AFRINIC has a 2026 budget. Its Finance Committee decision trail is still missing
AFRINIC has published a nearly balanced 2026 budget and an unaudited first-quarter report with unusually useful figures on revenue, costs, cash and reserves. The disclosure is real. The missing layer is the one assigned to its current Finance Committee: the recommendation…
Story
When AFRINIC changed its public face, the document map changed too
Four days before AFRINIC says it launched a replacement website on 17 May 2012, an archived homepage still called the organisation “AfriNIC” and sent readers towards flat routes such as `documents.htm`, `registrationServices.htm` and `policy.htm`. By 3 July, another archived…
Story
AFRINIC ended 2012 with 49 DS records from only two members
AFRINIC’s year-end disclosure captured real use of a new member-facing service: 49 DS records associated with 13 domains, supplied by two members. The exactness of those numbers is valuable, but it is not an adoption rate. Without a count of eligible members or domains, signed…
Story
What AFRINIC’s 2012 Africa Internet Summit launch did—and did not—create
AFRINIC says it officially launched the Africa Internet Summit on 15 May 2012 during AFRINIC-16 in Serekunda, The Gambia; its May media archive dates the launch item 17 May. The distinction matters because the institutional act was a launch on the 15th, while the 17th identifies…
Story
The Khartoum Line Between Maintenance and Consequence
At AFRINIC-17, a practical dispute over inaccurate registry contacts exposed a harder institutional question: when does responsible database maintenance become a rule that changes a member’s position? The meeting record shows why the answer matters to both network continuity and…
Story
AFRINIC completed the parent trust chain for its signed reverse zones
On 10 May 2012, IANA’s publication of DS records in the two parent reverse zones changed what validating resolvers could verify about AFRINIC-signed reverse DNS. The significance lay in matching keys, delegation state and a reversible operating procedure—not in any enlargement of…
Story
The D1-to-D2 Redline in “No Reverse Unless Assigned”
One line in AFRINIC’s second draft made the proposed reverse-DNS rule more precise; another made it reach further. Draft 2 said that one registered assignment or sub-allocation within a /24 would be enough for that /24, and it gave an affected LIR twelve months after a reminder…
Story
No Reverse Unless Assigned: Draft 1 Put a Database Error in the DNS Decision Path
On 10 April 2012, Tim McGinnis submitted the first “No Reverse Unless Assigned” proposal, asking AFRINIC to condition a new reverse-DNS delegation on a registered assignment or sub-allocation. The draft confronted a genuine weakness in public network records, but it also exposed…
Story
Nine Zones, One Open Link: What AFRINIC’s DNSSEC Phase 2 Actually Changed
On 3 May 2012, AFRINIC began distributing signed versions of nine IANA-delegated reverse-DNS zones—six for IPv4 and three for IPv6—while deliberately leaving the parent DS connection and the publication of members’ DS records for a later phase. That distinction was not a…
Story
When a WHOIS Edit Became a Cryptographic Instruction
In 2012, AFRINIC gave members a way to send DS records towards parent reverse-DNS zones by updating `domain` entities in its WHOIS database. The feature sounded like a modest extension of registry administration. In fact, it joined two very different systems: a record about who…
Story
AFRINIC published an audit opinion. Its Audit Committee’s work remains off the public record
AFRINIC’s 2025 accounts carry an unmodified external-audit opinion, an independence statement and a disclosure that the auditor received no other service fees. Those are real safeguards. But they do not answer the separate question created by AFRINIC’s own Audit Committee…
Story
Resolution 201111.138 ratified IPv4 Soft Landing after a 34-month process
One sentence adopted on 21 November 2011 purported to close 1,048 days of argument over AFRINIC's dwindling IPv4 pool. The sentence matters less as a ceremony of authority than as a pointer to the exact draft, allocation limits and scope correction that the Board said it…
Story
Resolution 201110.134 created a committee to review AFRINIC's bylaws
Five insiders received a one-sentence mandate in October 2011: turn unspecified feedback from AFRINIC-14 into possible bylaw improvements. The later record shows consultation, comments, further drafting and a new 2012 text, but it does not let an outsider trace each originating…
Story
The Returned Envelope and the Locked Drawer
AFRINIC’s 2012 WHOIS cleanup proposal began with a sensible ledger problem and ended with an authority it could not possess. The useful question was how a private registry should keep contact records accurate and make its own maintenance work visible. The dangerous one was…
Story
Regional Internet Registry Privacy Draft 2 proposed a six-month retention limit
AFRINIC’s 2012 privacy proposal put a simple clock on personal data and a public test on transfers abroad. Its failure to win consensus reveals a harder question: how should a number-resource policy restrain a registry’s demands on applicants without pretending to legislate the…
Story
Resolution 201110.135 created an election-process review committee
A terse six-page presentation shows that AFRINIC's 2011 election review produced more than a promise. The harder question is how much of that draft survived into binding corporate rules—and why the documentary trail goes quiet precisely where acceptance, implementation and…
Story
Resolution 201110.131 put a USD 100,000 boundary on delegated transactions
Four named signatories could conduct AFRINIC's business under its authorisation policy, but one sentence drew a hard numerical boundary around that delegation: an external transaction in excess of USD 100,000, or its equivalent in another currency, had to return to the Board. The…