Person profile

Person

Tomas Lynch

Public policy participant

The available evidence covers Roles: author.

Source description Public policy participant

Latest 2019

Roles: author

Confidence

Information type: RIR policy participation

Related details

Tomas Lynch
Tomás Lynch es ingeniero electrónico de la UBA con una maestría en gerenciamiento de ingeniería de la FIU.
public people profile
Tomas Lynch
public people profile
Tomas Lynch
Authors Tomas Lynch - Version [1, 2]
public people profile

Last updated: 2026-10-09

Roles

Role:authorNot yet assessedHistorical

Role:Public Policy Forum moderator (LACNIC)· 2019 – 2023Not yet assessedHistorical

Role:Founding member (LACNOG)Not yet assessed

Role:Senior Network Architect (Vultr)Not yet assessed

Source facts

RIR Policy Participation

1RIRs participated

3Policies participated

2Total policy messages

Jul 5, 2019First participation

Nov 25, 2019Last participation

LAC-2018-13Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy ListUnknown · 1 Discussion messages
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
The LAC-2018-13 notice invites community comments on unresolved staff observations. It expresses no personal support or opposition by Tomas Lynch, so it cannot establish consistency or inconsistency in his substantive position.
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The LAC-2018-13 notice invites community comments on unresolved staff observations. It expresses no personal support or opposition by Tomas Lynch, so it cannot establish consistency or inconsistency in his substantive position.
Conditions: The notice is jointly signed by Tomas Lynch and Ariel Weher in their policy-process role. · The Spanish and Portuguese versions state 25 July 2019, whereas the English version states 25 June 2019. The conflicting dates do not establish a single deadline or a change of personal position.
Jul 5, 2019
We would like to receive community feedback and comments on the impact analysis of LAC-2018-13 ?Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List, version 3,? as some of the staff?s comments remain unresolved.
Jul 5, 2019
el 25 de Julio de 2019.
Jul 5, 2019
until 25 June 2019.
Jul 5, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List · Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Inviting comments on LAC-2018-13 and announcing a later procedural step for LAC-2019-6 concern different proposals and stages. These actions do not demonstrate contradictory personal policy positions.
Conditions: The assessment is limited to two validated notices from July and November 2019. · A conclusion about consistency across substantive positions would require statements attributable to Tomas Lynch that express those positions and their conditions.
Jul 5, 2019
We would like to receive community feedback and comments on the impact analysis of LAC-2018-13 ?Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List, version 3,? as some of the staff?s comments remain unresolved.
Jul 5, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC
Nov 25, 2019
We inform you that today is the culmination of initial discussion period for the following proposals: - LAC-2019-6 v2: Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity The next step will be the assessment of the consensus by the co-chairs within two weeks from today.
Nov 25, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC
LAC-2019-6Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive CapacityUnknown · 1 Discussion messages
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
The LAC-2019-6 notice announces the end of initial discussion and a forthcoming consensus assessment. It neither endorses or opposes the proposal nor announces that consensus has already been reached.
Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The LAC-2019-6 notice announces the end of initial discussion and a forthcoming consensus assessment. It neither endorses or opposes the proposal nor announces that consensus has already been reached.
Conditions: The notice is jointly signed by the policy chairs; it does not distinguish either signatory's personal position. · Only this procedural notice is present for this policy in the assessed corpus.
Nov 25, 2019
We inform you that today is the culmination of initial discussion period for the following proposals: - LAC-2019-6 v2: Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity The next step will be the assessment of the consensus by the co-chairs within two weeks from today.
Nov 25, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List · Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Inviting comments on LAC-2018-13 and announcing a later procedural step for LAC-2019-6 concern different proposals and stages. These actions do not demonstrate contradictory personal policy positions.
Conditions: The assessment is limited to two validated notices from July and November 2019. · A conclusion about consistency across substantive positions would require statements attributable to Tomas Lynch that express those positions and their conditions.
LAC-2023-3Considerations for Declaring a Proposal AbandonedUnknown · 0 Discussion messages
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated

RIR Policy Participation

1RIRs participated

3Policies participated

2Total policy messages

Jul 5, 2019First participation

Nov 25, 2019Last participation

LAC-2018-13Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy ListUnknown · 1 Discussion messages

Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency

The LAC-2018-13 notice invites community comments on unresolved staff observations. It expresses no personal support or opposition by Tomas Lynch, so it cannot establish consistency or inconsistency in his substantive position.

Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List

Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The LAC-2018-13 notice invites community comments on unresolved staff observations. It expresses no personal support or opposition by Tomas Lynch, so it cannot establish consistency or inconsistency in his substantive position.

Conditions: The notice is jointly signed by Tomas Lynch and Ariel Weher in their policy-process role. · The Spanish and Portuguese versions state 25 July 2019, whereas the English version states 25 June 2019. The conflicting dates do not establish a single deadline or a change of personal position.

Jul 5, 2019
We would like to receive community feedback and comments on the impact analysis of LAC-2018-13 ?Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List, version 3,? as some of the staff?s comments remain unresolved.

Jul 5, 2019
el 25 de Julio de 2019.

Jul 5, 2019
until 25 June 2019.

Jul 5, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC

Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List · Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity

Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Inviting comments on LAC-2018-13 and announcing a later procedural step for LAC-2019-6 concern different proposals and stages. These actions do not demonstrate contradictory personal policy positions.

Conditions: The assessment is limited to two validated notices from July and November 2019. · A conclusion about consistency across substantive positions would require statements attributable to Tomas Lynch that express those positions and their conditions.

Jul 5, 2019
We would like to receive community feedback and comments on the impact analysis of LAC-2018-13 ?Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List, version 3,? as some of the staff?s comments remain unresolved.

Jul 5, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC

Nov 25, 2019
We inform you that today is the culmination of initial discussion period for the following proposals: - LAC-2019-6 v2: Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity The next step will be the assessment of the consensus by the co-chairs within two weeks from today.

Nov 25, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC

LAC-2019-6Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive CapacityUnknown · 1 Discussion messages

Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency

The LAC-2019-6 notice announces the end of initial discussion and a forthcoming consensus assessment. It neither endorses or opposes the proposal nor announces that consensus has already been reached.

Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity

Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The LAC-2019-6 notice announces the end of initial discussion and a forthcoming consensus assessment. It neither endorses or opposes the proposal nor announces that consensus has already been reached.

Conditions: The notice is jointly signed by the policy chairs; it does not distinguish either signatory's personal position. · Only this procedural notice is present for this policy in the assessed corpus.

Nov 25, 2019
We inform you that today is the culmination of initial discussion period for the following proposals: - LAC-2019-6 v2: Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity The next step will be the assessment of the consensus by the co-chairs within two weeks from today.

Nov 25, 2019
Tom?s Lynch Ariel Weher Chairs of the Public Development Process LACNIC

Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for the Policy List · Resources Are Assigned in a Unique and Exclusive Capacity

LAC-2023-3Considerations for Declaring a Proposal AbandonedUnknown · 0 Discussion messages

Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated