Person profile
PersonPublic policy participant
The available evidence covers Roles: Internet-Draft author (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid).
Source description Public policy participant
Marcelo Bagnulo Photo of Marcelo Bagnulo Marcelo Bagnulo
public people profile
Marcelo Bagnulo Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
public people profile
Last updated: 2026-10-14
Source facts
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
Marcelo makes microallocation conditional on continued multihoming and calls for return when eligibility ends, citing routing-table cost. Only one authored position is available for this policy.
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003)
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Marcelo makes microallocation conditional on continued multihoming and calls for return when eligibility ends, citing routing-table cost. Only one authored position is available for this policy.
Conditions: One contemporaneous comment cannot establish a reversal or enduring consistency.
Por ello creo que se deberia agregar en la politica que el bloque resultante de la microasignacion debera ser devuelto en caso que el usuario final deje de ser multi-homed.
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003) · Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
Assessment: Consistent · Both comments tie access to shared resources to a justified purpose and its community costs: continued multihoming in one case, and scarcity, evaluation and public experimental results in the other. The different recommendations address different conditions and do not contradict each other in these texts.
Conditions: This limited alignment covers two same-day comments, not the participant's full historical record.
pero es un bien MUY costoso para la comunidad ya que impacta con una entrada en tabla de rutas de la DFZ.
LOs resultados de los exprimentos realizados deberan ser p?blicos y estar en una p?gina web disponible para su consulta por la comunidad en general.
direcciones IPv4 son un recurso muy escaso.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
Marcelo opposes LACNIC experimental IPv4 allocations while allowing a regional IPv6 approach, citing scarcity and different stages of development. This is a stated distinction, not evidence of a reversal.
Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Marcelo opposes LACNIC experimental IPv4 allocations while allowing a regional IPv6 approach, citing scarcity and different stages of development. This is a stated distinction, not evidence of a reversal.
Conditions: Only this authored comment is assessed; formal authorship alone is not treated as endorsement of every policy version.
En particualr para IPv4, yo creo que LACNIC NO deberia realizar asignaciones exprimentales.
que puede tener sentido tener una politica de asignaciones exprimentales en IPv6 propia de LACNIC,
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003) · Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
Assessment: Consistent · Both comments tie access to shared resources to a justified purpose and its community costs: continued multihoming in one case, and scarcity, evaluation and public experimental results in the other. The different recommendations address different conditions and do not contradict each other in these texts.
This limited alignment covers two same-day comments, not the participant's full historical record.
pero es un bien MUY costoso para la comunidad ya que impacta con una entrada en tabla de rutas de la DFZ.
LOs resultados de los exprimentos realizados deberan ser p?blicos y estar en una p?gina web disponible para su consulta por la comunidad en general.
direcciones IPv4 son un recurso muy escaso.
