인물 프로필
인물BTW 디렉터리는 Marcelo Bagnulo에 관한 공개 기록을 한곳에 모아 제공합니다.
확인 가능한 근거는 역할: Internet-Draft author (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)를 다룹니다.
출처 정보
관점 일관성: 일관성 판단에 필요한 근거가 부족합니다
Marcelo makes microallocation conditional on continued multihoming and calls for return when eligibility ends, citing routing-table cost. Only one authored position is available for this policy.
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003)
평가: 일관성 판단에 필요한 근거가 부족합니다 · Marcelo makes microallocation conditional on continued multihoming and calls for return when eligibility ends, citing routing-table cost. Only one authored position is available for this policy.
조건: One contemporaneous comment cannot establish a reversal or enduring consistency.
Por ello creo que se deberia agregar en la politica que el bloque resultante de la microasignacion debera ser devuelto en caso que el usuario final deje de ser multi-homed.
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003) · Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
평가: 일관성 · Both comments tie access to shared resources to a justified purpose and its community costs: continued multihoming in one case, and scarcity, evaluation and public experimental results in the other. The different recommendations address different conditions and do not contradict each other in these texts.
조건: This limited alignment covers two same-day comments, not the participant's full historical record.
pero es un bien MUY costoso para la comunidad ya que impacta con una entrada en tabla de rutas de la DFZ.
LOs resultados de los exprimentos realizados deberan ser p?blicos y estar en una p?gina web disponible para su consulta por la comunidad en general.
direcciones IPv4 son un recurso muy escaso.
관점 일관성: 일관성 판단에 필요한 근거가 부족합니다
Marcelo opposes LACNIC experimental IPv4 allocations while allowing a regional IPv6 approach, citing scarcity and different stages of development. This is a stated distinction, not evidence of a reversal.
Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
평가: 일관성 판단에 필요한 근거가 부족합니다 · Marcelo opposes LACNIC experimental IPv4 allocations while allowing a regional IPv6 approach, citing scarcity and different stages of development. This is a stated distinction, not evidence of a reversal.
조건: Only this authored comment is assessed; formal authorship alone is not treated as endorsement of every policy version.
En particualr para IPv4, yo creo que LACNIC NO deberia realizar asignaciones exprimentales.
que puede tener sentido tener una politica de asignaciones exprimentales en IPv6 propia de LACNIC,
Multihomed End User Microallocation (2003) · Resource Allocation for Experimental Use (2003)
평가: 일관성 · Both comments tie access to shared resources to a justified purpose and its community costs: continued multihoming in one case, and scarcity, evaluation and public experimental results in the other. The different recommendations address different conditions and do not contradict each other in these texts.
조건: This limited alignment covers two same-day comments, not the participant's full historical record.
pero es un bien MUY costoso para la comunidad ya que impacta con una entrada en tabla de rutas de la DFZ.
LOs resultados de los exprimentos realizados deberan ser p?blicos y estar en una p?gina web disponible para su consulta por la comunidad en general.
direcciones IPv4 son un recurso muy escaso.
