Person profile
PersonLecturer I (Federal University of Lafia)
The available evidence covers Roles: Lecturer I (Federal University of Lafia).
Source description Lecturer I (Federal University of Lafia)
Haruna Umar Adoga is a Lecturer I, in the Department of Computer Science
public people profile
Last updated: 2026-10-21
Source facts
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
He favors advance mailing-list debate, retaining co-chairs until an in-person election, and addressing appeals. These concern different procedural situations; they do not prove that he applies one standard consistently in all cases.
Policy Development Process in the AFRINIC service region | AFPUB-2010-GEN-005
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He favors advance mailing-list debate, retaining co-chairs until an in-person election, and addressing appeals. These concern different procedural situations; they do not prove that he applies one standard consistently in all cases.
Community members and proposal authors should be actively involved in the discussions mailing lists.
Like most people who have made their opinions known, I am of the opinion that we continue with these co-chairs, until we are able to have a face-to-face meeting to hold an election.
+1 Fernando.
an appeal has been made against the confirmation of the Co-chairs and it needs to be addressed.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
Two near-identical posts on 26 May 2019 support anti-hijacking measures with a longer objection period. They represent one repeated position, not separate evidence of consistency over time.
Provisions for Resource Hijacking
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · Two near-identical posts on 26 May 2019 support anti-hijacking measures with a longer objection period. They represent one repeated position, not separate evidence of consistency over time.
The suspected hijacker should be given a maximum of 6 weeks rather that 4 weeks to object any conclusions, as proposed by the authors.
The suspected hijacker should be given a maximum of 6 weeks rather that 4 weeks to object any conclusions, as proposed by the authors.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
He opposes the September 2020 AS0 proposal because of anticipated network-recovery delays. This single statement cannot establish a lasting position or verify the technical concern.
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He opposes the September 2020 AS0 proposal because of anticipated network-recovery delays. This single statement cannot establish a lasting position or verify the technical concern.
I am however not in support of this proposal.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
The forwarded June 2019 exchange supports inter-RIR transfers generally without choosing between two drafts. Two near-identical September 2020 posts oppose Comprehensive Scope. The change of emphasis warrants examination, but is not proof of reversing support for an unchanged draft.
IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) Draft 1 | Archived
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The forwarded June 2019 exchange supports inter-RIR transfers generally without choosing between two drafts. Two near-identical September 2020 posts oppose Comprehensive Scope. The change of emphasis warrants examination, but is not proof of reversing support for an unchanged draft.
it is only sensible that we support this policy.
I am however not in support of this proposal in its current draft.
I am however not in support of this proposal in its current draft.
IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) Draft 1 | Archived · Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-1) Archived
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He challenges a scarcity argument in one proposal and invokes resource availability in the other. This tension merits scrutiny, but different proposals and claims do not by themselves prove contradiction. He does not explain his preference between their rules.
One of the false arguments (in my opinion) made by the author of the IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) proposal, is that new businesses are unable to get IP addresses, which is slowing down the growth of businesses in Africa. If we can have statistics that supports this claim, it will be helpful, as I am not convinced that not having this policy is hindering IP assignments to businesses in our region. I am however not in support of this proposal in its current draft.
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
He supports incoming resources to improve broadband access. He does not discuss outbound conditions; one statement cannot establish consistency over time.
Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-1) Archived
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He supports incoming resources to improve broadband access. He does not discuss outbound conditions; one statement cannot establish consistency over time.
Hi all, I am in full support of the Resource Transfer Policy, because it?s time for us, as a community to move forward and stop lagging behind, when compared to the other RIRS (in terms of number of available resources). Allowing the transfer of resources into our region will help with the current efforts of increasing broadband penetration in Africa.
IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) Draft 1 | Archived · Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-1) Archived
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · He challenges a scarcity argument in one proposal and invokes resource availability in the other. This tension merits scrutiny, but different proposals and claims do not by themselves prove contradiction. He does not explain his preference between their rules.
One of the false arguments (in my opinion) made by the author of the IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) proposal, is that new businesses are unable to get IP addresses, which is slowing down the growth of businesses in Africa. If we can have statistics that supports this claim, it will be helpful, as I am not convinced that not having this policy is hindering IP assignments to businesses in our region. I am however not in support of this proposal in its current draft.
Hi all, I am in full support of the Resource Transfer Policy, because it?s time for us, as a community to move forward and stop lagging behind, when compared to the other RIRS (in terms of number of available resources). Allowing the transfer of resources into our region will help with the current efforts of increasing broadband penetration in Africa.
Hi all, I am in full support of the Resource Transfer Policy, because it?s time for us, as a community to move forward and stop lagging behind, when compared to the other RIRS (in terms of number of available resources). Allowing the transfer of resources into our region will help with the current efforts of increasing broadband penetration in Africa.
