Single-stack monitoring for RIR governance continuity.
Governance / RIR Watchdog
RIR Watchdog
RIR Watchdog governance intelligence tracks institutions, policy processes, standards activity, registry operations, accountability disputes, and implementation signals that affect internet infrastructure. BTW.

Institution legitimacy and policy execution quality.
Decision-critical policy and control changes.
Primary-source reporting plus structural interpretation.
Latest Coverage
Latest from RIR Watchdog
2,442 articles

Story
Resolution 200605.28: When a Board Calendar Creates Capacity but Not Accountability
In May 2006, AFRINIC’s Board fixed a recurring teleconference date for its own work. The choice was practical and potentially valuable. But a date on a calendar is only the space in which oversight might happen; the public record needed to show whether that space was used is a…

Story
ASO turned AFRINIC’s disputed appointment into a working global-policy seat
The NRO welcomed AFRINIC’s post-election Board, that Board announced a representative with the Receiver’s consent, and ASO records later show the appointee doing council work. What the 16-reference does not supply is the underlying appointment resolution, minutes, vote roll or…

Story
The name behind the ledger: what AFRINIC’s 2007 Article 2.2 put in Board hands
A single sentence in AFRINIC’s archived 2007 bylaws separated the company’s registered identity from a direct member vote. Reading that sentence as an authority chain—not as either harmless branding or constitutional grandeur—shows where efficient corporate administration ends…

Story
The IPv6 PI Choice AFRINIC-4 Could Not Settle
In Nairobi on 17 May 2006, a proposal for provider-independent IPv6 space forced an unusually clear argument about what a registry can record, what operators will route, and who should pay when those two realities do not align. The answer was not adoption or rejection, but an…

Story
AFRINIC implemented AFPUB-2005-v4-001 as its regional IPv4 allocation rule
On 17 May 2006, a dense allocation manual became the practical interface between an African Local Internet Registry and new IPv4 supply: a /22 floor, or 1,024 addresses, an additional-allocation test at about 80% use, and assignment benchmarks of 25% immediately and 50% after one…

Story
Resolution 200605.30: A Chair, a Term and the Limits of Office
One terse entry from May 2006 names Pierre Dandjinou, records an internal board vote and gives his chairmanship an endpoint; what it leaves out is precisely what makes the appointment useful for understanding how a private registry should contain authority, preserve continuity…

Story
The ASN Transition Ledger: What Resolution 200605.27 Did—and Did Not—Approve
AFRINIC's 2006 record set a staged route from two-octet to four-octet AS numbers, but the surviving chronology, compatibility design and later exceptions show why a resolution was only the beginning of implementation.

Story
The assent that completed AFRINIC’s part of the IPv6 supply chain
In May 2006, a short corporate resolution made AFRINIC a necessary entity in a common rule for supplying IPv6 space to the world’s regional registries. The rule was operationally valuable and its limits were just as important: approval inside a private coordination system was not…

Story
The One-Month Instrument Inside Resolution 200605.27
In May 2006, Resolution 200605.27 ratified AFPUB-2006-GEN-002: a renewable, one-month arrangement for temporary unicast IPv4 addresses, unicast IPv6 addresses and AS numbers. It required public evidence of the activity, a plan for use and an intended return, yet the surviving…

Story
The Eligibility Line Behind AFRINIC's 2006 ASN Decision
The Eligibility Line Behind AFRINIC's 2006 ASN Decision intelligence summary explains the development, the public evidence available to readers, the organisations involved, the regional context, market exposure, and the infrastructure consequences that may follow. The Story…

Story
AFRINIC's 2006 infrastructure waiver: a zero price, a guarded gate
In January 2006, AFRINIC waived an unspecified resource-assignment fee for internet exchange points and critical infrastructure, but it did not waive judgment: the small resolution left behind a revealing question about who qualified, who absorbed the cost and what “until further…

Story
AFRINIC ratified an abuse-contact rule with a revocation tail
AFRINIC’s 4 February policy decision made a monitored abuse mailbox mandatory, allowed validation whenever the registry sees fit and linked persistent non-compliance to possible termination of the Registration Service Agreement. The public record proves the power on paper, but…

Story
Six Seats, Three Clocks: What AFRINIC’s Regional Numbering Actually Governed
AFRINIC’s 2004 design gave six geographic candidate lines durable numbers and deliberately unequal opening terms. That modest piece of corporate engineering made succession easier to administer—and made it dangerously easy to confuse regional knowledge with territorial authority.

Story
The Missing Decision in AFRINIC's Three-Step Membership Doorway
In May 2004, AFRINIC presented a remarkably compact route into member-only status: send a form and signed agreement, then pay. The surviving record shows those acts clearly, but leaves the decisive question unresolved—who accepted an organisation as a member, by what criteria…

Story
Six gates in Dakar: AFRINIC’s first LIR admission-and-allocation sequence
On 24 May 2004 in Dakar, AFRINIC presented a compact route into LIR membership and a first resource decision: complete a form, sign an agreement, pay fees, undergo evaluation, obtain approval and, optionally, undergo evaluation of a first suballocation. The order made the process…

Story
When a support letter became a ballot in Dakar
In 2004, AFRINIC turned written organisational support into a temporary Board-election credential—an expedient bridge with an incomplete audit trail.

Story
AFRINIC’s Seventh Seat: When the Executive Joined the Board
On 24 May 2004, AFRINIC’s members present in Dakar reportedly approved a change that replaced a contemplated ICANN-appointed representative with the Executive Director as the seventh Board member. The decision created an indirect appointment chain and a lasting governance…

Story
AFRINIC carried a disputed voter register into its 2026 governance election
AFRINIC’s Board-approved election rules made the September 2025 voter designations the starting point for 2026 and treated a member’s non-response as confirmation. Three Governance Committee winners were later announced, but the result notice did not disclose the figures needed…

Story
When AFRINIC changed Trustees into Directors
AFRINIC’s May 2004 change of governing-office vocabulary made company-law responsibility easier to see, but the surviving record does not prove that it transferred a single power.

Story
What exactly did AFRINIC's members adopt in Dakar?
AFRINIC members reportedly adopted a company constitution on 24 May 2004. Exact text, electorate and tally remain unproved; it created no government for Africa.
Member Unlock
Restricted Profile Intelligence
Login is required to unlock full profile briefings and deep-dive sections.
Strategic Circle Briefing
Join to unlock strategic briefings after signing in.
Join Strategic CircleLeadership Alliance Briefing
For qualified IP-asset owners and management; sign in to unlock alliance briefings.
Join Leadership AllianceSession Map
Registry Sessions
ARIN
North America governance, transfer-market behavior, and member process monitoring.
Open ARINRIPE NCC
Accountability, member visibility, and implementation signals across the RIPE NCC region.
Open RIPE NCCAPNIC
Allocation pressure, policy adaptation, and Asia Pacific institutional execution.
Open APNICAFRINIC
Election process, legal continuity, and board legitimacy under institutional stress.
Open AFRINICLACNIC
Institutional adaptation and ICP-2 governance trajectory in Latin America.
Open LACNIC