LACNIC · RIR Watchdog
Policy
Start here for the proposal-by-proposal record: what changed, why it mattered, who argued for what, how positions evolved, what was decided, and where the evidence still has gaps.
RIR Watchdog
Policy records
- 01Policy records
- 02Policy evolution
- 03Entities
- 04Sources and coverage
Freshness: Stale · Last refresh:
158Policies
55People with verified identities
92Source accounts awaiting identity resolution
57Participated in 2+ policies
26Participated in 5+ policies
44.8%Top-five discussion share
UnknownMedian effective participants
6People covering 50%
Participation concentration
Who actually shaped this RIR?
Discussion statistics are still being updated. Figures shown reflect the records processed so far.
Open a linked profile to follow that person or organisation across policies, messages and changing positions. Every figure remains tied to the stated source coverage.
Recurring people and organisations
- Jordi Palet Martinez40 Policies participated · 79 Discussion messages
- RICARDO PATARA28 Policies participated · 69 Discussion messages
- Nicolas Antoniello26 Policies participated · 54 Discussion messages
- Gianina Pensky24 Policies participated · 101 Discussion messages
- Juan Alejo Peirano24 Policies participated · 83 Discussion messages
- Unknown21 Policies participated · 45 Discussion messages
- Paola Perez18 Policies participated · 40 Discussion messages
- Carlos Plasencia18 Policies participated · 35 Discussion messages
- Alex Ojeda12 Policies participated · 20 Discussion messages
- Sergio Rojas. . .12 Policies participated · 18 Discussion messages
Policy
Policy records
- LAC-2016-6
Modify the initial assignment size and the requirements for subsequent direct IPv6 assignments to end sites
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Mar 30, 2016 · Latest activity: Aug 1, 20162Policy versions5Discussion messages4Total participants2.8Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2016-4
Modify direct IPv6 address assignments to end users
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Mar 10, 2016 · Latest activity: Aug 1, 20162Policy versions13Discussion messages6Total participants4.1Effective participants92.3%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2016-1
Settling IPv4-IPv6 connectivity disputes when only one of the protocols is supported
Abandoned · Official status: Abandoned
Introduced: Jan 6, 2016 · Latest activity: May 19, 20162Policy versions22Discussion messages18Total participants14.2Effective participants45.5%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2015-3
IPv4 exhaustion policy with a scheduled termination date and the scheduled return of large users' blocks.
Abandoned · Official status: Abandoned
Introduced: Jul 2, 2015 · Latest activity: Apr 29, 20161Policy versions3Discussion messages2Total participants1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2015-1
Trigger 2.3.2.18 when a justified request larger than /22 is received which can not be allocated from any remaining pool of addresses at LACNIC.
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Mar 11, 2015 · Latest activity: Mar 14, 20162Policy versions8Discussion messages4Total participants2.9Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2015-5
Increase the minimum period of time required before a block can be transferred under section 2.3.2.18
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Oct 1, 2015 · Latest activity: Dec 15, 20152Policy versions4Discussion messages5Total participants4Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2015-6
Modify the scope of IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 2 for the region
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Sep 1, 2015 · Latest activity: Nov 19, 20151Policy versions3Discussion messages3Total participants1.8Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2014-3
Update to the Policy Development Process
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Sep 9, 2014 · Latest activity: Oct 9, 20153Policy versions10Discussion messages8Total participants6.2Effective participants80%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2014-2
Modification to the text describing ASN distribution requirements
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Nov 3, 2014 · Latest activity: Mar 3, 20152Policy versions67Discussion messages29Total participants17.6Effective participants40.3%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2014-1
Creation of an IPv4 reserve exclusively for IPv6 deployment
Abandoned · Official status: Abandoned
Introduced: Nov 5, 2014 · Latest activity: Nov 5, 20141Policy versions3Discussion messages4Total participants1.8Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2013-1
Publishing information on reassigned IP address blocks via FTP
Abandoned · Official status: Abandoned
Introduced: Aug 15, 2014 · Latest activity: Nov 5, 20141Policy versions11Discussion messages10Total participants8.1Effective participants63.6%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2013-4
Management of Returned Internet Resources
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Aug 15, 2014 · Latest activity: Oct 3, 20141Policy versions15Discussion messages7Total participants3.8Effective participants93.3%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2012-8
Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers
Abandoned · Official status: Abandoned
Introduced: Aug 15, 2014 · Latest activity: Sep 3, 20143Policy versions21Discussion messages18Total participants11.3Effective participants52.4%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2013-3
Adapting the allocation / assignment policy for IPv4 exhaustion.
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Nov 25, 2013 · Latest activity: Mar 25, 20142Policy versions10Discussion messages10Total participants7.1Effective participants70%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2013-2
Principles Governing the Distribution of Number Resources
Accepted · Official status: Implemented
Introduced: Sep 26, 2013 · Latest activity: Feb 12, 20141Policy versions12Discussion messages5Total participants3.1Effective participants100%Top-five discussion share - LAC-2012-13
Modifying requirements for ASO AC nominees
Accepted · Official status: Reached consensus
Introduced: Dec 6, 2012 · Latest activity: Jul 9, 2013Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2012-12
Eliminating Requirement for Initial IPv4 End-User Requests (Pedro R Torres Jr)
Accepted · Official status: Reached consensus with a minor change on the title. The following word "requerimientos" was replaced for "requisitos".
Latest activity: Mar 11, 2013Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2012-10
Distribution of IPv6 addresses longer than / 32 (Ricardo Patara)
Accepted · Official status: Reached consensus with a note that does not affect the spirit of the proposal. The following phrase "fronteras binarias" was replaced for "fronteras hexadecimales".
Latest activity: Mar 11, 2013Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2012-09
Updated RIRs-on-48 (Ricardo Patara)
Accepted · Official status: Reached consensus
Latest activity: Mar 11, 2013Source coverage is incomplete.
- LAC-2012-05
Distributions / IPv4 allocations distributed by the IANA post exhaustion.(Gustavo Lozano)
Accepted · Official status: Reached consensus
Latest activity: Mar 11, 2013Source coverage is incomplete.