North America NOGs
North America NOGs
North America governance intelligence tracks institutions, policy processes, standards activity, registry operations, accountability disputes, and implementation signals that affect internet infrastructure. BTW.

Latest Coverage
Latest from North America NOGs
57 articles

NANOG
The Name Moved: What NANOG’s Merit-to-NewNOG Record Can Establish
NANOG’s public record makes an important institutional change unusually tangible: it names an outgoing manager, an incorporated successor, a transition period and three assets transferred by agreement. That visibility is valuable. It is also bounded. The documents show how a…

NANOG
A Call for Content Is Not a Selection Record: What NANOG’s Public Programme File Can Show
NANOG’s public materials reveal more of the route into a meeting programme than a bare agenda would: a call, review language, shepherding, dated milestones and several historical descriptions of committee responsibility. But visibility at the entrance is not the same as a…

NANOG
A Video Archive Is Not an Attendance Ledger: What NANOG’s Public Meeting Record Can—and Cannot—Show
NANOG’s public presentations, broadcasts and tutorials preserve a valuable window onto technical exchange. The window is not the room: the reviewed public material does not establish a complete measure of sessions, access, participation, corrections, consent, representation or…

NANOG
A Sponsor Line Is Not an Agenda Firewall: What NANOG’s Public Programme File Can Show
Sponsorship and programme selection answer different practical questions at a technical meeting, yet their public traces often appear on the same event surface. That proximity can create either complacency or suspicion. Neither response is adequate. NANOG’s public material makes…

NANOG
A Workshop Seat Is Not a Deployment Record: What NANOG’s Public Training File Can Show
Technical communities often speak about education in the language of opportunity: a workshop, a clinic, a webinar, a hackathon, a tutorial, a room with a limited number of chairs. That language matters. It tells prospective entities that some form of learning is being offered. It…

NANOG
An Open Archive Is Not a Moderation Record: What NANOG’s Mailing-List File Can Show
An open technical archive can make an institution easier to inspect without making every institutional judgment answerable from the archive alone. NANOG’s public mailing-list materials offer a useful case: they expose a stated forum, rules, a reporting route, historical committee…

NANOG
A Board Roster Is Not an Election Record: What NANOG’s Public Governance File Can Show
An elected board can be real even when the public evidence is incomplete. The useful question is neither whether every ballot should be exposed nor whether a winner list settles everything. It is whether an outside reader can trace, in proportionate aggregate form, how a…

NANOG
A Survey Is a Signal, Not a Mandate: What NANOG’s Feedback Record Can Show
NANOG’s published materials show a recurring practice of asking people at its meetings what worked, what they want to hear next, and where an event can improve. That is valuable institutional behaviour. The harder public question is narrower: what record would let an outside…

NANOG
Twelve Meetings, Two Countries: What NANOG's Host Map Does Not Measure
Across NANOG 84 through NANOG 95, the organisation held twelve consecutive meetings: ten in the United States and two in Canada. The sequence demonstrates geographic movement, echoing a much older presentation that framed changing locations as a way to spread travel burden. It…

NANOG
A NANOG thread says 300 IS-IS routers are the easy question
Three hundred is a count, not a design. A late-indexed NANOG reply completed an operator exchange in which the short answer was that a flat IS-IS Level 2 domain can carry that scale; the more consequential answer was that acceptable failure scope, repair time and…

NANOG
Counting Entry, Not Continuity: Where NANOG's Participation Record Stops
NANOG’s annual reports have become increasingly detailed about how people appear in its meeting record: registrations by mode, first-time entities, membership status, students, speakers, women in attendance, employment bands and organisation types. Its programme record also…

NANOG
The Twelve Applications Behind Four Names
NANOG’s 2023 annual report reveals a consequential handoff: a scholarship administration contractor supplied the Scholarship Committee with the top 12 applications, and the committee selected four recipients. That disclosure makes one stage visible while leaving the intake…

NANOG
The Price of Entering the Room
NANOG publishes a clear price for admission to its meetings. It does not—and perhaps cannot on a registration page—publish the full price of becoming a familiar, trusted and repeatedly visible entity in the North American network-operations community. Reconstructing that larger…

NANOG
The $1.58 Million Boundary: What a NANOG Sponsor Buys—and What Still Has to Pass Review
In 2024, meeting sponsorship supplied NANOG with $1,576,133 in cash—more than meeting fees and roughly half of all revenue and support. Yet the public sponsorship offer does not promise a technical talk, and the published proposal process assigns selection to the Program…

NANOG
Three SSIDs, Three Duties: What NANOG’s Meeting Network Publishes—and What It Leaves Unmeasured
At NANOG 97, an attendee choosing Wi-Fi was also choosing among three different promises. The main network offered WPA3 with a public shared key. The legacy network was openly unencrypted. The third network offered IPv6 without an IPv4 gateway or DHCP. That compact menu is more…

NANOG
NANOG Planned for Email History. Its Official Discord Still Needs a Public-Record Bridge.
NANOG made two announcements on consecutive days in February 2025. One invited its community into a newly official Discord server and described what people could do there. The other explained, in unusually concrete terms, how its mailing lists would move to new software without…

NANOG
The Talk Was Accepted. The Evidence Wasn't Settled: NANOG's Vendor Test After the Stage
A number can travel farther than the qualification printed beside it. The dispute that followed NANOG 96's presentation on IP geofeeds shows why vendor research should be judged neither by the employer on the title slide nor by the applause in the room. Its proper test is whether…

NANOG
The Business Card Is Allowed. Price Coordination Isn't: NANOG's Commercial Boundary
At NANOG 89, a peering representative could stand at a highboy table with business cards and a single white paper or one-sheet while a customised slide rotated nearby. The precision of that setup captures the institution's commercial problem: independently controlled networks…

NANOG
The Empty Chair With an End Date
NANOG’s rules allow a vacant Board seat to be filled at once—but only until the calendar turns. The important question is not whether temporary power exists. It is whether members can see its authority, its clock and the route back to their vote.

NANOG
NANOG’s Board Mandate Has a Denominator
NANOG’s election archive becomes most useful where it names not only the winners, but the eligible electorate and the ballots cast. Those figures support a serious defence of the organization’s internal self-government. They also show exactly why a NANOG election cannot be made…
