Topic
Court and Continuity Risk
Within the Topic facet, Court and Continuity Risk topic intelligence connects articles that share a specific subject, signal focus, or monitoring theme. The page gives readers a richer path through related reporting, source evidence, market actors, and infrastructure implications, with enough context to understand why the topic matters across company movements, governance decisions, regional exposure, and operational risk. Readers can compare recurring signals, affected organisations, public evidence, market context, service continuity, procurement, competition, compliance, and strategic planning questions behind the subject instead of stopping at a thin list of matching articles. It explains what the topic covers, which infrastructure actors or policies are involved, what evidence supports the coverage, and why the subject may matter for operators, customers, investors, and policy readers.

Story
The Policy Compliance Dashboard appeal tested reviewability of a non-consensus assessment
The Policy Compliance Dashboard looked like an administrative instrument, but its classifications sat upstream of notices and potentially serious registry actions. When the co-chairs concluded that significant objections remained, the ensuing appeal posed a more important…

Story
Eighteen Days to Redraw a Boundary: What AFRINIC’s Draft 5 Left Unsettled
AFRINIC’s official details and current proposal list place eighteen days between Draft 4 and Draft 5 of its abuse-contact proposal, then only twelve days between Draft 5 and the AFRINIC-31 discussion. That narrow interval matters because the new draft made a genuine concession…

Story
AFRINIC called an interim takedown order a legal confirmation. The order says less
The Mauritius Supreme Court temporarily barred Cloud Innovation from falsely attributing judicial approval to AFRINIC-address leasing and ordered related material removed. AFRINIC then presented that ex parte order as confirmation of a wider legal position. The published ruling…

Story
The RIR governance draft changed hands before the public could inspect version 3
On 28 July, the ASO Address Council delivered its recommended RIR Governance Document to the NRO Executive Council and transferred responsibility for the text. The document, the explanation of changes from version 2 and the redline were not published with that handoff. The next…

Story
AFRINIC’s March 2018 continuity test: two interim offices, one elected seat
Between 22 and 26 March 2018, AFRINIC’s Board moved through a tightly sequenced leadership transition: it sought signed resignations, installed Abibu Ntahigiye and Christian Bope as interim chair and vice-chair, put a review deadline on those appointments, and treated Sunday…

Afrinic SAGA
After the Silence: What AFRINIC’s 2017 Written Cure Needed to Prove
AFRINIC’s members heard the audited statements without recorded objection, yet the annual meeting never adopted them. A later 78 per cent resolution offered a sensible repair—but only a distinct, traceable member act could close the gap left by silence.

Story
ICANN and Mauritius must separate their AFRINIC powers
ICANN can question whether AFRINIC still satisfies recognition criteria, while Mauritius’ courts determine the receiver’s legal authority. Treating those two powers as interchangeable would deepen the registry’s legitimacy crisis.

Story
AFRINIC’s litigation story needs an incentive timeline
The dispute with Cloud Innovation became a continental governance crisis, but labels such as aggressor or defender obscure the control question: who could prolong each case, who authorised that action and who was paid when it continued?

Story
AFRINIC contained a million-address routing incident. Its safeguard record is still incomplete
AFRINIC says it removed IRR entries that helped unauthorised routes from the reserved block 102.224.0.0/12 spread, contacted transit providers and intensified monitoring. Public route history supports much of that account and shows the routes are no longer visible to RIPE RIS…

Story
AFRINIC called transfer-policy criticism “mischievous.” The authority case is still open
AFRINIC answered outside criticism of its transfer policy by declaring its Board properly constituted, defending a bottom-up process and directing members to official channels. Its own litigation page now records the challenge to that Board’s ratification as ongoing. The gap is…

Story
AFRINIC named four election gatekeepers. It did not show how its Board chose them
AFRINIC’s 2026 Nomination Committee decided who reached final slates for seven governance positions. The Board published the four appointees and later identified a chair, but the fixed public record does not show the applicant pool, the appointment assessment, conflict…

Story
AFRINIC sought an HR audit. Its Remuneration Committee’s follow-through is not public
AFRINIC opened an unusually specific HR consultancy process in April: test the skills of 41 staff, review performance appraisal and build a succession plan for business continuity. Four months later, the public procurement notice remains easy to find. The award, signing date…

Story
A 106–34 tally is not an electorate
AFRINIC disclosed the vote that assigned an extra year, but not the voter register, turnout denominator or complete eligibility record needed to audit it.

Story
An interim refusal does not decide the policy
AFRINIC’s docket lists a policy challenge, a declined and unserved interim application, and an appeal. All remain ongoing; none is a published merits judgment.

Story
AFRINIC’s PDWG consensus needs an audit record
Two people applied for staggered co-chair seats; one was accepted and the other seat deferred. The public packet omits counts and eligibility reasons.

Story
AFRINIC has a 2026 budget. Its Finance Committee decision trail is still missing
AFRINIC has published a nearly balanced 2026 budget and an unaudited first-quarter report with unusually useful figures on revenue, costs, cash and reserves. The disclosure is real. The missing layer is the one assigned to its current Finance Committee: the recommendation…

Afrinic SAGA
AFRINIC’s USD 107,994 Write-Off: The Missing Reconciliation Behind a Material Loss
AFRINIC’s 2012 accounts recorded USD 107,994 in bad-debt expense, rounded in the annual report to USD 108,000. The disclosure matters not because a write-off proves wrongdoing—it does not—but because it joins three institutionally different acts in one compact passage: removing…

Story
AFRINIC published an audit opinion. Its Audit Committee’s work remains off the public record
AFRINIC’s 2025 accounts carry an unmodified external-audit opinion, an independence statement and a disclosure that the auditor received no other service fees. Those are real safeguards. But they do not answer the separate question created by AFRINIC’s own Audit Committee…

Story
AFRINIC elected three GovCom members. Its two Board appointments remain unpublished
AFRINIC completed the membership vote for three Governance Committee seats in June and opened the remaining two voting seats to Board appointment on 17 July. Applications closed on 28 July. At the 11 August evidence cut-off, the registry’s current committee page still said…

Story
AFRINIC’s Legal Committee has four names—and no public charter
AFRINIC’s Board and Receiver created a Legal Committee in October 2025 to inventory every ongoing case, optimise legal resources and review information about allegedly fraudulent election documents. Nearly ten months later, AFRINIC’s public register names the four committee…
