BTW.Media
Daily editionStrategic Internet Intelligence
Sign InRegister

Organisation profile

Organisation

Frontier Communications of America, Inc.

Frontier Communications of America, Inc. appears in public ASN/IP network-resource records for AS5650, giving readers a view into the address-resource layer behind internet reachability.

The available evidence covers Network identity: AS5650, Services: 1, Related networks: 1,223, and ASNs: 1.

Source description Frontier Communications of America, Inc. is recorded as a network operator. Current public evidence covers 1 ASN, one supporting public reference; services, assets, and relationship context should be read with that evidence boundary.

GlobalLatest 2026-07-24
  • 1ASNs
  • 1,223Relationships
  • 1Services
Location
Global
Network identity
AS5650
Services
1
Related networks
1,223

Confidence

1
Information type
Frontier Communications of America, Inc. is the organisation operating autonomous system AS5650. Public evidence also covers one supporting public reference. BTW tracks it to pin down the responsible operator, the services these number resources support, and the upstream, peer, and customer relationships behind its routing.

Related details

Last updated: 2026-06-02

Network identity

1
AS5650

Services

1
Service:Managed networkNot yet assessed· 1 record

Related networks

1,223
Transit topology: Frontier Communications of America, Inc.CENTURYLINK COM…AS3561COGENT COMMUNIC…AS1239VERIZON BUSINESSAS701Anthropic, PBCAS4167Dahlin Smith Wh…AS4376FIBERNET Corp.AS5048Investors Title…AS5097MIDWEST-CABLEAS13347ISOMEDIA, Inc.AS7351LAKSH CYBERSECU…AS941LAKSH CYBERSECU…AS1022MIDWEST-CABLEAS953MIDWEST-CABLEAS1020Velocity Networ…AS8018Vivid Internet …AS7344Walrus InternetAS7169AT & T ENTERPRI…AS7018Corix NetworksAS1000LumenAS3356PCI Fiber, LLCAS6322TWELVE99 Arelio…AS1299Velocity Networ…AS62952RIPE NETWORK CO…AS286
This entityupstream / providerdownstream / customerpeer

The entity is centre-left; follow the arrows right to see how its routes reach the Tier-1 core, and left for its own customers. Scroll or use the buttons to zoom · drag the background to pan · click a node to open it in the directory.

Data as of 2026-07

The entity sits on the left and its connections fan out by role on the right; the graph shows each group’s most confident connections, and the full list below carries every relationship.

Full list

MIDWEST-CABLEMultiple relationships recorded
upstreamHigh confidence· 6 records· 6 unrated· Latest 2026-06peerHigh confidence· 3 records· 3 unrated· Latest 2026-06
WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc.
peerHigh confidence· 3 records· 3 unrated· Latest 2026-06
ASN-BICS Belgacom International Carrier Services SA
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
RCN-AS - RCN
peerHigh confidence· 3 records· 3 unrated· Latest 2026-06
BYTEDANCE - Bytedance Inc.
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
RC-COLO1 - RingCentral Inc
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
SALESFORCE - Salesforce.com, Inc.
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
SOFTLAYER - IBM Cloud
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
HURRICANE
peerHigh confidence· 3 records· 3 unrated· Latest 2026-06
CABLEINET Virgin Media Limited
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
INTERCLOUD-ASN BSO Network Solutions SAS
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
AS-SSI
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
YAHOO
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
PFOUNDATION
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
HUB-ADVANCED-NETWORKS-LLC - HUB Advanced Networks, LLC
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
EXPEDIENT - Expedient
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
ALLIED-TELECOM - Allied Telecom Group, LLC
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
RACKDOG-LLC - Rackdog, LLC
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
MNET
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
ROUTEVIEWS
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06

Related research

1
  • Frontier Communications made telecom system isolation a customer-continuity test

    Frontier Communications' 2024 cyber incident showed that a telecom operator can face two linked accountability tests at once: contain unauthorized access without making customers guess whether service, support, billing, and account data remain dependable, and then prove that personal-information risk was separated from network-continuity risk with evidence rather than reassurance. The incident made system isolation, restoration sequence, customer notice, and telecom resilience part of the same public record.

    Primary articlePublished 2026-07-12