Minor revision to the PDP

u intend to solve) This proposal suggests a minor modification to the text which would allow a proposal to continue under discussion when the chairs and the authors believe it is reasonable to do so, without the need for the author to submit a new version with an “artificial” modification to keep the proposal within the PDP cycl

u intend to solve) This proposal suggests a minor modification to the text which would allow a proposal to continue under discussion when the chairs and the authors believe it is reasonable to do so, without the need for the author to submit a new version with an “artificial” modification to keep the proposal within the PDP cycle. In addition, it would avoid staff “overhead” due to having to transate a new version with “artificial” modifications.

of the Chairs o If consensus is not reached, to decide together with the author(s) whether they would like to publish a new version, maintain the current version or abandon the proposal. If a new version is submitted, the 8-week discussion period mus

New Text: o If consensus is not reached, to decide together with the author(s) whether they would like to continue to discuss the proposal (either the same version or a new version) or to abandon the proposal. If the decision is to continue to discuss the proposal, the 8-week discussion period must

References Policy Development Process in RIPE: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642 Pre

n References PDP in RIPE: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642 Presented at: LACNIC 30