Alan Barrett

公開記録では、Alan Barrett はインターネット基盤に関わる意思決定、訴訟、ガバナンス、または運用に関係する人物として確認されています。

確認できる情報は役割: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)を網羅しています。

最新観測 May 2012

役割: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)

信頼度

公的役割: 現在の役職と所属は引き続き検証が必要です。
情報の種類: Alan Barrett の公的な役割、意思決定、または法的関与は、ネットワーク投資、市場参入、インフラ政策、責任範囲に影響し得ます。この人物記録では、引用された記録と現在の役職に関する確認を分けて示します。

役職

Role:Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)· May 2012未評価履歴情報

Role:Interim Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (documented June 2011) (AFRINIC)未評価履歴情報

出典に基づく事実

RIR ポリシーへの参加

1参加した RIR

10参加したポリシー

13ポリシーメッセージ総数

2011/05/09初回参加

2014/11/28最終参加

AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless Assigned不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
条件: Only one procedural report is supplied for this policy.
2013/06/20
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
2013/06/20
* No Reverse Unless Assigned AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-02
afpub-2012-gen-001AFPUB-2012-GEN-001-DRAFT-02不明 · 2 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01不明 · 2 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
条件: Meeting consensus and subsequent last-call outcomes must remain separate.
2013/06/20
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
2013/06/20
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
条件: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
2013/06/20
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
2013/06/20
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
条件: No consensus at this meeting does not itself mean withdrawal or board rejection.
2013/06/20
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
2013/06/20
* Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
条件: A report of absent consensus is not a personal verdict on the proposal.
2013/06/20
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
2013/06/20
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
条件: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
2013/06/20
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
2013/06/20
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V6-001AFPUB-2013-V6-001-DRAFT-01不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC region不明 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft Landing不明 · 2 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
board-statement-2014-11-25-resource-allocationAFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014修正付き支持 · 1 ディスカッションのメッセージ
見解の一貫性: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です
Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
AFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014
評価: 一貫性を評価するには証拠が不十分です · Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
条件: The response expresses a principle of policy-bound administration, not a verified decision on an individual application.
2014/11/26
I am in agreement with all of it
2014/11/26
both the letter and the spirit of the existing policies.
2014/11/26
the correct remedial action is not to petition the staff or the board to do things outside the policy, but rather to go through the policy development process to change the policy.

Alan Barrett

信頼度

関連情報

役職

RIR ポリシーへの参加

RIR ポリシーへの参加