Alan Barrett

O papel público, as decisões ou a participação jurídica documentados de Alan Barrett podem influenciar investimentos em redes, acesso ao mercado, políticas de infraestrutura ou limites de responsabilidade; este dossiê separa os registros citados da verificação do cargo atual.

Os dados disponíveis abrangem Cargos: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC).

Mais recente May 2012

Cargos: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)

Evidências

Papel público: As fontes públicas citadas identificam Alan Barrett como uma pessoa ligada a decisões, litígios, governança ou operações relevantes para a infraestrutura da internet; o cargo e a afiliação atuais ainda precisam ser verificados.

Detalhes relacionados

Alan Barrett
The PDWG unanimously elected Alan P Barrett as the other PDWG Co-Chair, to complete Dr Nyirenda’s remaining 1 year term ending June 2013.
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com Sun May 18 07:07:35 UTC 2014
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Chairs: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> S. Moonesamy <sm+afrinic at elandsys.com>
public people profile

Última atualização: 2026-09-25

Cargos

Role:Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)· May 2012Ainda não avaliadoHistórico

Role:Interim Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (documented June 2011) (AFRINIC)Ainda não avaliadoHistórico

Fatos com fonte

Participação em políticas RIR

1RIRs com participação

10Políticas com participação

13Mensagens de política

9 de mai. de 2011Primeira participação

28 de nov. de 2014Última participação

AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless AssignedDesconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência
Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
Condições: Only one procedural report is supplied for this policy.
20 de jun. de 2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20 de jun. de 2013
* No Reverse Unless Assigned AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-02
afpub-2012-gen-001AFPUB-2012-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Desconhecida · 2 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Nenhuma posição explícita declarada
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01Desconhecida · 2 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Nenhuma posição explícita declarada
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02Desconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência
Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
Condições: Meeting consensus and subsequent last-call outcomes must remain separate.
20 de jun. de 2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20 de jun. de 2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Condições: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20 de jun. de 2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
20 de jun. de 2013
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01Desconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência
The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
Condições: No consensus at this meeting does not itself mean withdrawal or board rejection.
20 de jun. de 2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20 de jun. de 2013
* Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01Desconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência
Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
Condições: A report of absent consensus is not a personal verdict on the proposal.
20 de jun. de 2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20 de jun. de 2013
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Condições: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20 de jun. de 2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V6-001AFPUB-2013-V6-001-DRAFT-01Desconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Nenhuma posição explícita declarada
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionDesconhecida · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Nenhuma posição explícita declarada
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft LandingDesconhecida · 2 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Nenhuma posição explícita declarada
board-statement-2014-11-25-resource-allocationAFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014Apoio com mudanças · 1 Mensagens de discussão
Coerência do ponto de vista: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência
Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
AFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014
Avaliação: Evidências insuficientes para avaliar a consistência · Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
Condições: The response expresses a principle of policy-bound administration, not a verified decision on an individual application.
26 de nov. de 2014
I am in agreement with all of it
26 de nov. de 2014
both the letter and the spirit of the existing policies.
26 de nov. de 2014
the correct remedial action is not to petition the staff or the board to do things outside the policy, but rather to go through the policy development process to change the policy.