Alan Barrett

تُعرّف السجلات العامة المستشهد بها Alan Barrett كشخص مرتبط بقرارات أو دعاوى أو حوكمة أو عمليات ذات صلة بالبنية التحتية للإنترنت؛ ولا يزال المنصب والانتماء الحاليان بحاجة إلى تحقق.

تشمل الأدلة المتاحة الأدوار: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC).

الأحدث May 2012

الأدوار: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)

الثقة

نوع المعلومات: قد يؤثر الدور العام أو القرارات أو المشاركة القانونية الموثقة لـ Alan Barrett في الاستثمار في الشبكات أو النفاذ إلى السوق أو سياسات البنية التحتية أو حدود المسؤولية؛ ويفصل هذا الملف بين السجلات المستشهد بها والتحقق من المنصب الحالي.

التفاصيل ذات الصلة

Alan Barrett
The PDWG unanimously elected Alan P Barrett as the other PDWG Co-Chair, to complete Dr Nyirenda’s remaining 1 year term ending June 2013.
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com Sun May 18 07:07:35 UTC 2014
public people profile
Alan Barrett
Chairs: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> S. Moonesamy <sm+afrinic at elandsys.com>
public people profile

آخر تحديث: 2026-09-25

الأدوار

Role:Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC)· May 2012لم يتم التقييم بعدتاريخي

Role:Interim Policy Development Working Group Co-chair (documented June 2011) (AFRINIC)لم يتم التقييم بعدتاريخي

حقائق موثقة

المشاركة في سياسات السجلات الإقليمية

1السجلات التي شارك فيها

10السياسات التي شارك فيها

13إجمالي رسائل السياسات

09‏/05‏/2011أول مشاركة

28‏/11‏/2014آخر مشاركة

AFPUB-2012-DNS-001No Reverse Unless Assignedغير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
No Reverse Unless Assigned
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
الشروط: Only one procedural report is supplied for this policy.
20‏/06‏/2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20‏/06‏/2013
* No Reverse Unless Assigned AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-02
afpub-2012-gen-001AFPUB-2012-GEN-001-DRAFT-02غير معروفة · 2 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2012-V4-001AFPUB-2012-V4-001-DRAFT-01غير معروفة · 2 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02غير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
الشروط: Meeting consensus and subsequent last-call outcomes must remain separate.
20‏/06‏/2013
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
20‏/06‏/2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
الشروط: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20‏/06‏/2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
20‏/06‏/2013
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-001AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01غير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
الشروط: No consensus at this meeting does not itself mean withdrawal or board rejection.
20‏/06‏/2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20‏/06‏/2013
* Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01غير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
الشروط: A report of absent consensus is not a personal verdict on the proposal.
20‏/06‏/2013
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
20‏/06‏/2013
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
الشروط: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
20‏/06‏/2013
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
20‏/06‏/2013
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V6-001AFPUB-2013-V6-001-DRAFT-01غير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
afpub-2014-gen-003Anycast resource assignments in the AFRINIC regionغير معروفة · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT02IPv4 Soft Landingغير معروفة · 2 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: لم يُذكر موقف صريح
board-statement-2014-11-25-resource-allocationAFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014تأييد مع تعديلات · 1 رسائل النقاش
اتساق وجهة النظر: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق
Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
AFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014
التقييم: الأدلة غير كافية لتقييم الاتساق · Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
الشروط: The response expresses a principle of policy-bound administration, not a verified decision on an individual application.
26‏/11‏/2014
I am in agreement with all of it
26‏/11‏/2014
both the letter and the spirit of the existing policies.
26‏/11‏/2014
the correct remedial action is not to petition the staff or the board to do things outside the policy, but rather to go through the policy development process to change the policy.