Perfil de persona
PersonaAlan Barrett importa porque los cambios en su rol, relaciones, posicion de gobernanza o alcance operativo pueden afectar las operaciones de red y la visibilidad del mercado.
Los datos disponibles abarcan Cargos: Policy Development Working Group Co-chair, elected May 2012 (AFRINIC).
Respalda la identidad, el rol o el contexto organizativo de Alan Barrett.
public people profile
Última actualización: 2026-09-25
Hechos con fuentes
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Alan reports rough consensus at AFRINIC-18 for No Reverse Unless Assigned and anticipates last call. This meeting-stage report is not a personal endorsement or a final ratification decision.
Condiciones: Only one procedural report is supplied for this policy.
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
* No Reverse Unless Assigned AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-02
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Alan includes Academic IPv4 Allocation among proposals that reached rough consensus at the meeting. No personal argument or later comparison for that policy is supplied here.
Condiciones: Meeting consensus and subsequent last-call outcomes must remain separate.
The following policy proposals acheieved rough consensus during the PDP discussions at the AFRINIC-18 meeting today.
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Condiciones: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · The Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers proposal appears under the meeting's no-consensus outcome. Alan's report alone cannot be used to label him opposed to transfers or to infer a reversal.
Condiciones: No consensus at this meeting does not itself mean withdrawal or board rejection.
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
* Inter RIR IPv4 Address Transfers AFPUB-2013-V4-001-DRAFT-01
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Alan reports that the IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting. That observation does not establish his personal opposition or how his own position changed.
Condiciones: A report of absent consensus is not a personal verdict on the proposal.
The following policy proposal was also discussed today, but did not achieve consensus:
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01 · AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Different reported consensus outcomes for IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment and Academic IPv4 Allocation concern the meeting's treatment of different proposals. They are not evidence that Alan applies contradictory personal principles, because the message reports outcomes without stating his own substantive positions on either proposal.
Condiciones: Both entries come from one meeting report, not two independent personal endorsements.
* Academic IPv4 Allocation AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-02
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
Coherencia del punto de vista: No se expresa una postura explícita
Coherencia del punto de vista: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia
Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
AFRINIC Board statement on resource allocation — 25 November 2014
Evaluación: No hay pruebas suficientes para evaluar la coherencia · Alan agrees with the board statement while emphasizing the letter and spirit of existing policy, checks proportionate to the requested space, and policy change through the PDP rather than ad hoc intervention. These positions fit together within this response; one exchange is insufficient to assess change over time. His closing question about an application is not evidence of its approval.
Condiciones: The response expresses a principle of policy-bound administration, not a verified decision on an individual application.
I am in agreement with all of it
both the letter and the spirit of the existing policies.
the correct remedial action is not to petition the staff or the board to do things outside the policy, but rather to go through the policy development process to change the policy.
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01
* IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment AFPUB-2013-V4-002-DRAFT-01