South Africa is poised to mandate licences for digital asset exchanges, making it one of the first countries on the continent to do so. FSCA Commissioner Unathi Kamlana disclosed in a Bloomberg interview that over 300 crypto-asset providers sought authorisation, with licencing applications being processed gradually due to the substantial number received. Under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, the FSCA will regulate cryptocurrency firms, emphasising honesty, integrity, competency, and consumer protection, aiming to address regulatory gaps and enforce obligations to safeguard consumers’ interests. South Africa will become one of the first countries on the continent to require permission for digital asset exchanges to function when it grants licences to about 60 cryptocurrency companies by the end of the month. Crypto providers seek authorisation More than 300 crypto-asset providers requested authorisation, according to the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), which offered exchanges until November 30 to apply for licences or face facing disciplinary action. In a Bloomberg interview, FSCA Commissioner Unathi Kamlana stated, “ We are processing those licencing applications and we’re doing so in a phased kind of manner given the numbers.” Also read: UBS launches Hong Kong’s first tokenised warrant The regulator will oversee the companies under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, which focuses on the honesty, integrity, competency, and ability of all financial services providers under its requirements, rather than developing a separate framework specifically for crypto operators. FAIS act enhances consumer protections The FAIS Act would provide consumers with resources and safeguards publicly documented context to them currently, and the regulator will have the authority to take enforcement action against any operators who violate any of the act’s obligations. Also read: Nigeria issues summons to Binance CEO over alleged financial crimes Kamalana has stated that most gaps will be covered under the present law. “As we licence and supervise, we will discover that perhaps there are gaps that cannot be closed by the existing regulatory framework. And we might need to build on that as we discover what those are. ” See also: IPv4 vs IPv6: Why Scarce IPv4 Blocks Are Still Premium.