Time Horizon
2011 Present
Within the Time Horizon facet, 2011 Present time-horizon intelligence organises articles by the period over which a signal is expected to matter. The page helps readers distinguish immediate operational changes from longer-cycle governance, investment, standards, and infrastructure shifts that may unfold across quarters or years. It connects timing assumptions with public evidence, related actors, market context, customer exposure, policy pressure, and infrastructure planning so readers can judge whether a development is urgent, strategic, or still waiting on confirming evidence. The page also explains how time horizon changes the meaning of a signal, which organisations may be exposed, and which infrastructure decisions require short-term action or long-cycle monitoring.

Story
Delegated RPKI and the Right to Hold Your Own Keys
Delegated RPKI promises that a resource holder can operate its own certification authority and retain the private key used to sign routing authorizations. The promise is technically substantial but institutionally incomplete. Key autonomy is usable only when the option is…

Story
RPKI Terms of Service Versus Routing Liability
When a registry-controlled certificate or published authorisation changes a legitimate route from Valid to Invalid, networks that reject Invalid announcements can make the error economically real within minutes. Terms that give an institution decisive certificate powers while…

Story
Hosted RPKI and the Convenience Trap
Hosted RPKI turns a difficult security function into a few choices in a registry portal. That is a genuine public benefit. It also places the certificate key, signing service, publication system and revocation path close to the same registrar that controls resource records.…

Story
A Capital Market Needs a Neutral Registrar
A Capital Market Needs a Neutral Registrar intelligence summary explains the development, the public evidence available to readers, the organisations involved, the regional context, market exposure, and the infrastructure consequences that may follow. The Story intelligence…

Story
Depreciation, Impairment and an Address Block That Does Not Wear Out
An IPv4 block does not rust, lose pixels or exhaust itself through use. Its economic value can nevertheless fall sharply. Accountants and holders need a model that separates protocol endurance, market liquidity and registry-dependent control instead of forcing all three into an…

Story
The Tax Authority Sees an Asset the Registry Denies
A tax system does not need to declare IPv4 addresses absolute property before it can tax a payment for transferring them. It can identify consideration, cost, holding purpose, contractual rights, business use, amortisation, gain and jurisdiction, then classify the resulting…

Story
Addresses in a Merger Purchase Price Allocation
An acquirer can call IPv4 space a registration, a licence, a contractual position or a bundle of operational rights and still have to put a fair value on it. Purchase price allocation does not wait for institutions to agree on a universal theory of ownership. It asks a narrower…

Story
The Balance-Sheet Asset With No Standard Name
IPv4 rights have become valuable enough to sell, lease, impair and finance, yet companies still place economically similar portfolios in different accounting boxes. Some acquired addresses appear as indefinite-lived intangibles, some are amortised over 17.5 years, some sit in…

ICANN
The 2011 IANA Ceremony and the Scarcity Clock That Kept Running
*The ceremony in Miami marked the end of routine top-level IPv4 distribution, not the end of IPv4 demand. Once IANA handed one final /8 to each Regional Internet Registry, the decisive authority moved down a level: regional institutions no longer merely distributed fresh stock…
