Institution associated with network resources
Svea Eknonomi Abuse Role
Svea Eknonomi Abuse Role is a institution associated with network resources with public network-resource records including AS211899, AS41634.
- Institution associated with network resources
At a glance
- Autonomous system numberLinked with AS211899, AS41634High confidence
Basic information
- Display nameSvea Eknonomi Abuse RoleHigh confidence
- Legal typeInstitutionHigh confidence
- Directory categoryInstitutionHigh confidence
- Last updatedJun 12, 2026High confidence
Locations
- Geography scopeUnavailableUnrated
Network identity
- Autonomous system numberAS211899High confidence
- Autonomous system numberAS41634High confidence
Other network resources
- NetworkSvea Eknonomi Abuse Role ASN/IP network resourcesHigh confidence
People and contacts
- ContactsPolicy, AbuseMedium confidence
- Available contact typesPolicy, AbuseMedium confidence
Registry and related records
- Editorial contextThe Chain That Was Touched: Where Attention Fell in the Svea Abuse-Contact Record, Nearly four years after Svea Ekonomi AB merged into Svea Bank AB on 3 January 2022, the abuse-contact surface the group presents in the RIPE registry still divides attention between a bank that has not touched its own records and a control chain that has. The registry timestamps tell the story plainly: the most recent modifications in this chain fall almost entirely outside Svea, on the sponsoring and maintainer side, while Svea's own objects — the person record, the autonomous system, the address block — have sat untouched since 2021 and 2022.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextFiling the Complaint: The Public Remedy Path Behind the Svea Abuse Contact, Svea's abuse contact in the RIPE registry passes every automated check the registry runs, and no public source shows it has ever answered a report. This briefing sets out the filing test: the channels a reporter can actually use today, and the observable responses that would separate a functioning channel from a registry placeholder.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextThe Remedy That RIPE Policy Already Defines: What Compliance Would Look Like for the Svea Abuse Surface, Three BTW articles published on 29 September 2026 documented how the Svea group's abuse-contact surface in the RIPE registry splits between a renamed organisation object, a person object still carrying a dissolved company's name, and contradictory mirror displays. None of them answered the practical question this briefing takes up: the RIPE NCC's own rules already define what repairing that surface would require — and what compliance would concretely look like. Measured against those rules, the surface remains where prior coverage left it: registered valid, operationally unproven, and now held to a regulatory standard the same bank has already failed to meet on paper.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextRegistered Valid, Operationally Unproven: Where the Svea Abuse Surface Stands After the Finansinspektionen Sanction, Nearly four years after Svea Ekonomi AB merged into Svea Bank AB, and months after Sweden's financial supervisor fined the survivor bank SEK 170 million for anti-money-laundering failures, the abuse-contact surface the Svea group presents in the RIPE registry still reads as a system that exists on paper. This briefing checks whether anything has materially changed since our previous reports: it finds no registry update, no RIPE NCC action and no independent operator evidence that shifts the surface from registered validity toward verifiable operation — and it names the concrete conditions that would.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextWhat Would Prove the Repair Is Durable? The Svea Abuse Roles After the Finansinspektionen Sanction, Nearly four years after Svea Ekonomi AB merged into Svea Bank AB on 3 January 2022, and roughly nine months after Sweden's financial supervisor fined the survivor bank SEK 170 million for anti-money-laundering failures, the abuse-contact surface the Svea group presents in the RIPE registry still splits between a renamed organisation, a person object carrying a dissolved company's name, and a third-party mailbox. Three prior BTW reports documented that split, the gap between registry validity and accountability, and the procedural remedy path. This report asks the question none of them answered: what evidence would actually prove that abuse-report handling has been repaired and that the repair is durable — and does any of it exist today?Medium confidence
- Editorial contextNearly Four Years After the Merger, the Svea Abuse Surface Still Splits Between Record and Responsibility, When Sweden's financial supervisor restated in December 2025 that Svea Bank had assumed all of its parent's obligations, it confirmed where responsibility legally lives. The RIPE record tells a more complicated story: an organisation object renamed to the survivor, a person object still carrying the dissolved company's name, and abuse-contact displays that disagree with each other.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextRegistered Validity Is Not Accountability: What the Svea Abuse Roles Prove After the Merger, When Svea Ekonomi AB merged into Svea Bank AB on 3 January 2022, the registry kept pointing abuse reports at contact objects that still carry the dissolved company's name. The RIPE NCC's own rules guarantee only that those mailboxes exist and can receive mail — not that anyone answers. A review of thirteen primary and secondary sources found no independent, non-registry evidence that the Svea abuse role accounts have received and acted on a single report since the merger.Medium confidence
- Editorial contextWho Answers When the Registry Names a Company That No Longer Exists: The Svea Remedy Path in the RIPE Record, When Svea Ekonomi AB merged into Svea Bank AB on 3 January 2022, Swedish company law dissolved the older firm and carried its obligations into the survivor. Finansinspektionen, the Swedish financial supervisor, records that transition in its own decision documents: "Den 3 januari 2022 fusionerades Svea Ekonomi AB, som var Sveas moderbolag, med Svea. All verksamhet som drevs av Svea Ekonomi AB kom därefter att drivas av Svea" ([Finansinspektionen sanction decision, 17 December 2025](https://fi.se/contentassets/d388bf1d1d1c47a1ac5dff513567510c/sanktionsbeslut-svea-bank-ab.pdf)). Yet the RIPE Database — the registry of record for the internet number resources this corporate family holds — still routes abuse reports through contact objects that mix the pre-merger and post-merger names. An autonomous system is registered to Svea Bank AB; a person object that anchors its technical contact still carries the address of Svea Ekonomi AB.Medium confidence
Source basis
- public registry sourcePublic registry sourceHigh confidence
Related research
- Primary articleThe Chain That Was Touched: Where Attention Fell in the Svea Abuse-Contact RecordHigh confidence
- Primary articleFiling the Complaint: The Public Remedy Path Behind the Svea Abuse ContactHigh confidence
- Primary articleThe Remedy That RIPE Policy Already Defines: What Compliance Would Look Like for the Svea Abuse SurfaceHigh confidence
- Primary articleRegistered Valid, Operationally Unproven: Where the Svea Abuse Surface Stands After the Finansinspektionen SanctionHigh confidence
- Primary articleWhat Would Prove the Repair Is Durable? The Svea Abuse Roles After the Finansinspektionen SanctionHigh confidence
- Primary articleNearly Four Years After the Merger, the Svea Abuse Surface Still Splits Between Record and ResponsibilityHigh confidence
- Primary articleRegistered Validity Is Not Accountability: What the Svea Abuse Roles Prove After the MergerHigh confidence
- Primary articleWho Answers When the Registry Names a Company That No Longer Exists: The Svea Remedy Path in the RIPE RecordHigh confidence
- Primary articleWhen the Registry Outlives the Company: Who Answers the Svea Abuse Line?High confidence
- Primary articleWhen Abuse Contacts Outlive the Company They Name: Inside the Svea Registry RecordHigh confidence