Confidence
1- Information type
- RIR policy participation
Related details
News from APNIC Paul Wilson, APNIC
public people profile
Last updated: 2026-09-21
Person profile
PersonPublic policy participant
The available evidence covers Roles: presenter (APNIC).
Source description Public policy participant
News from APNIC Paul Wilson, APNIC
public people profile
Last updated: 2026-09-21
Source facts
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated
Viewpoint consistency: No explicit position stated
Viewpoint consistency: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency
The announcement of a presentation on behalf of the RIRs does not state the author’s support or opposition to the transfer policy.
Policies for Transfer of 6bone Address Management Responsibilities to RIR
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · The announcement of a presentation on behalf of the RIRs does not state the author’s support or opposition to the transfer policy.
Status field for inet6num objects · Policies for Transfer of 6bone Address Management Responsibilities to RIR
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · A clear qualified objection exists for the terminology proposal, but the supplied announcement provides no attributable position for the transfer policy.
Viewpoint consistency: Consistent
The author opposes replacing established allocation terminology with delegate without a strong reason, citing established usage and implementation cost.
Status field for inet6num objects
Assessment: Consistent · The author opposes replacing established allocation terminology with delegate without a strong reason, citing established usage and implementation cost.
Conditions: The objection is qualified and concerns the proposed terminology replacement.
Status field for inet6num objects · Policies for Transfer of 6bone Address Management Responsibilities to RIR
Assessment: Insufficient evidence to assess consistency · A clear qualified objection exists for the terminology proposal, but the supplied announcement provides no attributable position for the transfer policy.