Skip to main content

Organisation profile

Organisation

moji

moji is recorded as a company.

The available evidence covers Legal type: Private company, Services: 2, Related networks: 7, and Relationships: 7.

Source description moji is recorded as a company. Current public evidence covers 2 supporting public references; services, assets, and relationship context should be read with that evidence boundary.

GlobalLatest 2026-06-18
  • 7Relationships
  • 2Services
Location
Global
Legal type
Private company
Services
2
Related networks
7

Confidence

3
Public role
Current public evidence covers 2 supporting public references; services, assets, and relationship context should be read with that evidence boundary.
Information type
moji appears with 2 supporting public references but no confirmed operator yet; BTW tracks it to link these public clues to a responsible organisation and its relationships.

Related details

Last updated: 2026-06-17

Current status

Legal type:Private companyNot yet assessed

Services

2
Service:Managed networkNot yet assessed· 1 record
Service:Peering / IXPNot yet assessed· 1 record

Related networks

7
Relationship topology: mojiOxymiumGofileGOFILE Wojtek SASU, trading a…The American University of Pa…moji
This entityupstream / providerdownstream / customerpeercorporate / legalother

The entity sits in the centre; its customers fan out to the left and its upstream providers to the right (arrows show transit direction). Scroll or use the buttons to zoom · drag the background to pan · click a node to open it in the directory.

Data as of 2026-06

The entity sits on the left and its connections fan out by role on the right; the graph shows each group’s most confident connections, and the full list below carries every relationship.

Full list

upstreamHigh confidence· 8 records· 8 unrated· Latest 2026-06
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06
peerHigh confidence· Latest 2026-06

Conflicting accounts & history

Conflicting record:Similar names require identity reviewNot yet assessedConflicting accounts