A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initialallocation criteria in the AsiaPacificregion

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The 2002 reply explains and defends registry-managed experimental allocations, using IPv6, four-byte ASNs and temporary conference assignments as context. There is only one supplied position on this proposal.

条件: The examples describe the author's historical understanding, not present-day allocation rules.

2002年8月21日

The basic premise of the proposal is that the registry system should be handling all Internet Resource allocations and assignments

A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initialallocation criteria in the AsiaPacificregion

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The 2004 reply asks for the source of an alleged secretariat proposal and invokes the bottom-up process. It does not state a position on the proposal's allocation thresholds.

条件: A question about provenance is not a support or opposition vote.

2004年1月28日

Where did you see that proposal from the secretariat?

2004年1月28日

BTW, if you don't like the bottom up process, please present a policy proposal to change it.

Change in the criteria for the recognition of NIRs in the APNIC region

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The 2008 reply calls for a clearer problem statement and documented effects on NIRs, governments and the wider APNIC structure. It establishes substantial concerns, but no earlier or later view on this proposal is supplied for comparison.

条件: Substantive criticism must not be reduced to a formal opposition vote that the author did not cast.

2008年8月27日

I believe this proposal needs substantial work to resolve the issues I mentioned above.

2008年8月27日

As it stands, it has significant impact on the entire APNIC, NIR and LIR structure and relationship; I feel this needs to be carefully considered and documented.

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations · A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initialallocation criteria in the AsiaPacificregion

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · Defending a mechanism for experimental allocations and requesting the provenance of a different IPv4 proposal are not conflicting positions on the same question.

条件: The messages are two years apart and address different policy functions.

2002年8月21日

The basic premise of the proposal is that the registry system should be handling all Internet Resource allocations and assignments

2004年1月28日

Where did you see that proposal from the secretariat?

A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initialallocation criteria in the AsiaPacificregion · Change in the criteria for the recognition of NIRs in the APNIC region

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The two later replies seek clarity, respectively about proposal origin and institutional effects. That shared concern is narrower than a demonstrated consistent substantive stance, and neither reply supplies a comparable vote.

条件: Similarity of questioning style alone does not establish policy consistency.

2004年1月28日

Where did you see that proposal from the secretariat?

2008年8月27日

I believe this proposal needs substantial work to resolve the issues I mentioned above.