prop-165: Provision of IPv4 Address Space to IPv6-only Networks for Transitional Purpose

prop-168: Increase to maximum IPv4 delegations

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · Hawker 说明自己是 prop-168 的作者，并以资源池预计耗尽为理由质疑 prop-165 的实用性。一次带条件的预测不足以证明其长期立场，也不能证明资源池确实耗尽。

条件: The forecast is expressly qualified by possible author bias and expectations about adoption and depletion. · Three observations of the same email must not be counted as three separate statements.

2026年8月11日

Acknowledging the potential for author bias, there is a reasonable expectation that Prop-168 that I have submitted, will deplete the available address pool within 6 months.

prop-165: Provision of IPv4 Address Space to IPv6-only Networks for Transitional Purpose

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · 他以程序、日落条款和政策制定为理由，要求撤回或推迟 prop-165，同时表示额外时间可能提高其获得共识的机会。这是对当前提案的有条件建议，不是立场反转的证据。

条件: Only one dated email is supplied. · Respect for an author’s effort is compatible with requesting postponement.

2026年8月11日

This recommendation is not to minimise the importance of the author's proposal in any way or to undervalue the time they have invested in its drafting, its more so to show that greater time is required to ensure that this proposal is shaped in a way that affords it the best chance of reaching consensus, and that as a result other proposals should be considered a "greater priority".

prop-162: WHOIS Privacy

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · WHOIS Privacy 提案在邮件中只是与目录服务可接受使用提案作范围比较。该比较没有表达支持或反对 WHOIS Privacy，也不能建立立场历史。

条件: Different directory-service subjects should not be treated as interchangeable policies.

2026年8月11日

Prop-162 is based on WHOIS Privacy, the proposal submitted (based on the title) is regarding Acceptable Use Terms for APNIC Directory Services.

prop-168: Increase to maximum IPv4 delegations · prop-165: Provision of IPv4 Address Space to IPv6-only Networks for Transitional Purpose

评估: 一致 · 在这封邮件中，prop-168 可能耗尽剩余资源的预期，被一致地用作 prop-165 可能变得多余的条件性论据。支持自己的地址分配提案，同时质疑另一项提案的实用性和时机，本身不构成矛盾。

条件: This is internal coherence of a single argument, not proof of consistency across time. · The predicted depletion and redundancy are not verified outcomes.

2026年8月11日

Acknowledging the potential for author bias, there is a reasonable expectation that Prop-168 that I have submitted, will deplete the available address pool within 6 months.

2026年8月11日

This, in and of itself, would render Prop-165 redundant.

prop-162: WHOIS Privacy · prop-165: Provision of IPv4 Address Space to IPv6-only Networks for Transitional Purpose

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · 邮件区分了 WHOIS Privacy 与可接受使用条款，同时质疑 prop-165 的议程安排。它没有提供关于 WHOIS Privacy 的可比实质立场，因此无法判断跨政策反转。

条件: Agenda access, proposal maturity and substantive policy preference are different questions.

2026年8月11日

Prop-162 is based on WHOIS Privacy, the proposal submitted (based on the title) is regarding Acceptable Use Terms for APNIC Directory Services.

2026年8月11日

On what basis was the decision made to reinstate a proposal that was withdrawn, instead of presented as a new proposal?