Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders

A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The message reports that the dark-address-space proposal did not reach consensus. It is a meeting summary and does not establish Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own position; one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.

条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.

2004年9月9日

- Consensus was not reached.

Application of the HD ratio to IPv4

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The message reports no clear consensus on applying the HD ratio to IPv4 and says the proposal should remain open. This is a process summary rather than a stated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.

条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.

2004年9月9日

- There was no clear consensus.

Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The message reports that the proposal to expand initial IPv6 allocations reached consensus. The report does not state Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own view, so one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.

条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.

2004年9月9日

- Consensus was reached.

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) policy for allocation of IPv6blocks to Regional InternetRegistries Adopted by all RIRs

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The message reports consensus on the revised IANA IPv6 allocation policy with parameter flexibility. This is a meeting outcome reported by the co-chair, not a substantiated personal position, and one record cannot establish consistency or a change over time.

条件: The record reports a group or process outcome and does not establish the participant’s personal support, opposition, adoption, or implementation view.

2004年9月9日

- Consensus reached for the revised proposal, with some flexibility of parameters. Flexibility is left for consensus of other regions

A proposal to prevent the routing of “dark” address space · Expansion of the initial allocation space for existing IPv6 address spaceholders

评估: 证据不足，无法评估一致性 · The summary reports different group outcomes for two proposals, but it does not provide Toshiyuki Hosaka’s own positions on either proposal. The comparison therefore cannot establish a cross-policy consistency or inconsistency finding.

条件: The comparison concerns reported group outcomes, not a verified personal viewpoint.

2004年9月9日

- Consensus was not reached.

2004年9月9日

- Consensus was reached.