Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

La crise Firestone-Ford Explorer a combiné séparations de bande de roulement, dynamique de véhicule, rappels et réforme. Le test de responsabilité est de savoir si chaque institution a pu identifier une population dangereuse et agir à temps.

The Firestone–Ford Explorer crisis was not one mechanically uniform event with one universally adjudicated cause. It joined a documented pattern of belt-leaving-belt tread separations in particular Firestone tire populations, a sport utility vehicle whose load, inflation recommendation and post-failure dynamics affected the risk environment, incomplete and divided field-information systems, overseas warning signals, disputed manufacturer testing, two differently scoped tire recalls, regulatory action, litigation and statutory reform. The accountability test is whether each institution that controlled part of that interacting system could identify a dangerous population, warn owners and regul