AFRINIC · RIR-Beobachtung
Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-1) Archived
Beginnen Sie hier mit der Dokumentation zu jedem einzelnen Vorschlag: Was änderte sich, warum war dies von Bedeutung, wer argumentierte wofür, wie entwickelten sich die Positionen, was wurde beschlossen und wo weist die Beleglage noch Lücken auf?
Quellenbelegte Fakten
- Richtlinien-ID
- AFPUB-2019-V4-003
- RIR
- AFRINIC
- Offizieller Status
- Unbekannt
- Normalisierter Status
- Unbekannt
- Eingebracht
- 05.11.2019
- Letzte Quellenaktualisierung
- 01.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Teilweise
Wer hat die Debatte tatsächlich geprägt?
Entwicklung der Richtlinie
Conditions on the transfer source · Draft 2 replaces the proposed explicit no-dispute condition with a requirement that the source comply with the receiving RIR's policies. This reports the clause as written, without assuming that external rules about disputes cease to apply.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Need assessment for incoming transfers · Draft 2 replaces the proposed no-needs basis and conditional ten-year plan with a needs-based evaluation for transfers into AFRINIC. This comparison concerns the proposed column, not the existing CPM conditions reproduced beside it.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.4.1 The transfer does not require approval from AFRINIC. It shall be approved as long as two parties are on mutual agreement to transfer. This policy is based on no need basis. However, if a transfer happens between AFRINIC and a region where needs basis is imposed, a plan must be submitted to AFRINIC which includes a brief illustration of the use of 50% of the transferred resources in the coming 10 years.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.1 A transfer from another RIR to AFRINIC requires a need-based evaluation. AFRINIC must approve the recipient's need for the IPv4 number resources.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Rules for outgoing transfers · Draft 2 expressly requires transfers from AFRINIC to another RIR to follow the receiving RIR's policy. The earlier proposal generally relied on mutual agreement, with a conditional plan where a needs-based region was involved.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
This policy is based on no need basis. However, if a transfer happens between AFRINIC and a region where needs basis is imposed, a plan must be submitted to AFRINIC which includes a brief illustration of the use of 50% of the transferred resources in the coming 10 years.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
A transfer from AFRINIC to another RIR must follow the policy of the receiving RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Treatment of legacy status · Draft 1 proposes deleting the clause that strips transferred IPv4 resources of legacy status. Draft 2 instead retains that clause in its proposed column. This is a change between proposed drafts, not a claim about any completed transfer.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. This paragraph will be removed.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
RIR handling of a transfer request · Draft 2 directs the source's request to the receiving RIR and refers to that RIR's policies. Draft 1 instead routes the request to the RIR where the resources are registered and refers to that transferring RIR's policies.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
If the two parties agree, the transferring party will send a request to the RIR with which the resources are registered, using a standard template and submit an official agreement of resource transfer to the involved RIR(s). The transfer shall be in compliance with the policies of the transferring RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
If the two parties agree, the transferring party will send a request to the receiving RIR, using a standard template and submit an official agreement of resource transfer to the involved RIR(s). The transfer shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Staff assessment of ASN coverage · Draft 2 includes a staff warning that ASN transfers are mentioned in the summary but the operative clauses refer only to IPv4. The summary's reference to AS numbers already appears in Draft 1, so this assessment is not evidence of newly added operative ASN rules.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
This proposal outlines a model in which AFRINIC can freely transfer number resources to/from other regions, i.e. RIPE NCC, APNIC, ARIN and LACNIC. This includes both IPv4 addresses and AS numbers.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
ASN transfer is mentioned only in the summary of the problem but all text in the policy clauses refers to IPv4 only, this is confusing and will lead to misinterpretation. It is important to have ASN inclusion clearly stated in the policy textQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Notification after transfer review · Draft 2 makes the receiving RIR notify the transferring RIR and parties after approval. Draft 1 makes the transferring RIR notify the receiving RIR and parties after deciding the request can proceed.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.5.2 After the transferring RIR has reviewed the application and deemed that it is appropriate to proceed with the transfer, it shall notify the receiving RIR, the transferring party and the recipient.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.5.2 After the receiving RIR approves the transfer, it will notify the transferring RIR, the transferring party and the recipient. The resources will be transferred to the recipient.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Disputed resources · Draft 3 restores an explicit prohibition on the source being involved in a dispute about the resources' status, alongside the receiving-RIR compliance requirement. Draft 2's proposed clause omits the explicit dispute restriction.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR, and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Further AFRINIC allocations after a transfer · Draft 3 bars a transfer source from further AFRINIC allocations or assignments for 12 months after approval. Draft 2 instead permits further resources subject to current policy. The unchanged current-policy column must not be mistaken for the earlier proposed condition.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.3.2 Source entities are eligible to receive further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC as long as it complies with current policy.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after a transfer is approved.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Preservation of legacy status · Draft 3 changes the proposed clause so transferred legacy resources retain legacy status. Draft 2's proposed clause removes that status. The comparison does not itself determine the consequences for membership, registration or need assessment.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.3 Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
ARIN compatibility feedback · Draft 3's assessment records ARIN's negative compatibility response concerning the requirement on a source to comply with the receiving RIR's policies. Draft 2 already raised this as a staff clarification issue. This is historical feedback on that draft, not a present-day compatibility finding.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
The source entity has no relationship with the receiving RIR. Can the authors clarify as to what they exactly mean here?Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
ARIN has responded that the Resource Transfer Policy is not compatible with their inter-RIR transfer policies because of the following statement thereinQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
RIPE NCC process feedback · Draft 3's assessment adds RIPE NCC feedback that section 5.7.5 conflicts with its policies and procedures and cannot be implemented as written. Draft 2 had already requested clarification on the proposed standard template. This records historical feedback, not a newly enacted procedure.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.5.1 speaks of using a standard template. Clarification is needed on this standard template - Is it a globally accepted standard template across all regions?Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
RIPE NCC Section 5.7.5 makes the policy not compatible with the RIPE policies and procedures and not possible to implement.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Conflicting captured submission dates · The Draft 3 page still gives 2020-08-13 in its details, while its revision history dates Version 3 to 21 September 2020. Draft 2's details and version history use August. The source conflict is retained; the comparison does not invent a corrected submission date.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
Date Submitted 2020-08-13 Author(s) Refer to Proposal Tab Status ArchivedQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
21 Sept 2020 Version 3: AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03 - Section 5.7.3.2, and 5.7.4.3, have been updated.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
APNIC compatibility feedback · Draft 3's staff assessment records APNIC's negative compatibility response, particularly about applying the receiving RIR's policies to the source. Draft 2 had raised the underlying jurisdiction question without this reported APNIC response.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
The source entity has no relationship with the receiving RIR. Can the authors clarify as to what they exactly mean here?Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
APNIC The APNIC inter-RIR policy is not compatible with the current text, especially “ The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR. ”Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
LACNIC feedback on the proposed procedure · Draft 3 records LACNIC's objection that the receiving-RIR-first request and notification procedure differs from how inter-RIR transfers were established. This is captured feedback, distinct from the proposal's own procedure and any later implementation.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.5.2 After the receiving RIR approves the transfer, it will notify the transferring RIR, the transferring party and the recipient. The resources will be transferred to the recipient.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
Paragraph 5.7.5 "Procedure of the resource transfer” states that the transferring party will submit a transfer request to the receiving RIR (Not the offering) and the receiving RIR will notify the transferring RIR once it approves the transfer". This is not in line with how INTER-RIR transfers were set up in any of the other RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Eligible resource holdings · Draft 4 replaces the proposed description of any holder posting a request and supplying an agreement with resources held in an AFRINIC or other RIR member account, or by a legacy holder. This changes the eligibility wording; other applicable requirements are not inferred away.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.2 IPv4 resources to be transferred – any resource holder who posts a transfer request to another party. An agreement of resource transfer shall be provided.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.2 IPv4 resources to be transferred - must be from an existing AFRINIC or any RIR member's account or from a Legacy Resource Holder.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Source jurisdiction requirement · Draft 4 removes the proposed requirement that the source comply with the receiving RIR's policies, while retaining rightful-holder and no-dispute conditions. This is a textual change, not proof that the earlier cross-RIR objections were all resolved.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR, and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current and rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall not be involved in any disputes as to those resources' status.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Holding period before retransfer · Draft 4 adds a 12-month prohibition on retransferring an incoming transferred resource. It retains the separate 12-month restriction on a source receiving new AFRINIC allocations or assignments.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after a transfer is approved.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for a period of twelve (12) months after a transfer is approved. An incoming transferred resource cannot be transferred again for a period of twelve (12) months.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Applicable policies for outgoing transfers · Draft 4 changes the outgoing-transfer clause from the receiving RIR's policy to the relevant policies. The new phrase is broader but does not enumerate which policies apply.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
A transfer from AFRINIC to another RIR must follow the policy of the receiving RIR.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
A transfer from AFRINIC to another RIR must follow the relevant policies.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Recipient eligibility · Draft 4 replaces any mutually agreeing recipient with an AFRINIC or other RIR member, or a legacy holder in any region. The needs-based clause for transfers into AFRINIC remains.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.4.2 The recipient can be any party who reaches an agreement of resource transfer with the sender.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.2 The recipient must be an AFRINIC or any RIR member, legacy holders in any regionQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Scope of legacy-status preservation · Draft 4 limits its express preservation of legacy status to incoming transferred legacy resources, whereas Draft 3 says transferred legacy resources generally. The comparison does not invent a status rule for outgoing transfers.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.4.3 Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.3 Incoming transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 4. ReferencesQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Detailed transfer procedure removed · Draft 4 omits the proposed 5.7.5 procedure, including the source's direct request to the receiving RIR and that RIR's notification steps. Its operative text ends after 5.7.4.3. This removes the draft's directions; it does not establish a replacement procedure.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transfer 5.7.5.1 The transferring party who holds the resources can initiate a transfer request between itself and an external party.Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Quellenbelegte Fakten +
5.7.4.3 Incoming transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 4. ReferencesQuellenbelegte Fakten ↗
No updated assessment established · Draft 3 includes a dated staff assessment and compatibility feedback. The retained Draft 4 page only says an assessment is to be updated. That placeholder is not evidence that the earlier concerns were resolved or that the revised proposal was approved.
Quellenbelegte Fakten −
AFRINIC Staff Assessment Date of Assessment Relevant to Proposal 13 Oct 2020 AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03Quellenbelegte Fakten ↗
Zeitverlauf der Debatte
Entitäten
Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
Quellen und Abdeckung
Offizielle Richtlinienquellen
Öffentliche Diskussionsarchive
- afrinic-rpd
- Früheste Erfassung
- 04.08.2004
- Letzte Erfassung
- 25.08.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 13.116
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- www.afrinic.net
- afrinic-africann
- Früheste Erfassung
- 03.08.2026
- Letzte Erfassung
- 02.10.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 2.548
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-afripv6-discuss
- Früheste Erfassung
- 17.08.2015
- Letzte Erfassung
- 18.09.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 2.538
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-announce
- Früheste Erfassung
- 18.08.2015
- Letzte Erfassung
- 18.09.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 2.497
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-community-discuss
- Früheste Erfassung
- 11.09.2015
- Letzte Erfassung
- 29.12.2019
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 3.127
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-dbwg
- Früheste Erfassung
- 04.08.2026
- Letzte Erfassung
- 06.10.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 898
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-dnssec-ops
- Früheste Erfassung
- 18.08.2015
- Letzte Erfassung
- 01.12.2016
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 307
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-icp2-review
- Früheste Erfassung
- 10.04.2025
- Letzte Erfassung
- 10.11.2025
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 0
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-measurement-wg
- Früheste Erfassung
- 01.02.2018
- Letzte Erfassung
- 22.11.2024
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 138
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-mira
- Früheste Erfassung
- 17.11.2020
- Letzte Erfassung
- 22.11.2024
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 0
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-ois-wg
- Früheste Erfassung
- 09.09.2021
- Letzte Erfassung
- 22.11.2024
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 0
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
- afrinic-rpki-discuss
- Früheste Erfassung
- 15.01.2016
- Letzte Erfassung
- 23.04.2026
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 11.10.2026
- Abdeckung
- Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig.
- Wird geladen
- 154
- Bekannte Lücken
- 0
Abdeckung
Teilweise
Früheste Erfassung: 04.08.2004
Letzte Erfassung: 11.10.2026
Aktualität
Bekannte Lücken
- www.afrinic.net: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- www.afrinic.net: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-rpd: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- www.afrinic.net: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-africann: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-afripv6-discuss: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-announce: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-community-discuss: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-dbwg: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-dnssec-ops: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-measurement-wg: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
- afrinic-rpki-discuss: Die Quellenabdeckung ist unvollständig. · Die Quellengrenze wurde noch nicht erreicht.
