AFRINIC · مراقبة سجلات الإنترنت الإقليمية
Resource Transfer Policy (Draft-1) Archived
ابدأ من هنا للاطلاع على سجل كل مقترح على حدة: ما الذي تغيّر، ولماذا كان مهمًا، ومن دافع عن أي موقف، وكيف تطورت المواقف، وما الذي تقرر، وأين لا تزال هناك ثغرات في الأدلة.
حقائق موثقة
- معرّف السياسة
- AFPUB-2019-V4-003
- RIR
- AFRINIC
- الحالة الرسمية
- غير معروفة
- الحالة الموحّدة
- غير معروفة
- تاريخ الطرح
- 05/11/2019
- آخر تحديث للمصادر
- 01/10/2026
- التغطية
- جزئية
من الذي شكّل النقاش فعلياً؟
تطور السياسة
Conditions on the transfer source · Draft 2 replaces the proposed explicit no-dispute condition with a requirement that the source comply with the receiving RIR's policies. This reports the clause as written, without assuming that external rules about disputes cease to apply.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
Need assessment for incoming transfers · Draft 2 replaces the proposed no-needs basis and conditional ten-year plan with a needs-based evaluation for transfers into AFRINIC. This comparison concerns the proposed column, not the existing CPM conditions reproduced beside it.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.4.1 The transfer does not require approval from AFRINIC. It shall be approved as long as two parties are on mutual agreement to transfer. This policy is based on no need basis. However, if a transfer happens between AFRINIC and a region where needs basis is imposed, a plan must be submitted to AFRINIC which includes a brief illustration of the use of 50% of the transferred resources in the coming 10 years.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.1 A transfer from another RIR to AFRINIC requires a need-based evaluation. AFRINIC must approve the recipient's need for the IPv4 number resources.حقائق موثقة ↗
Rules for outgoing transfers · Draft 2 expressly requires transfers from AFRINIC to another RIR to follow the receiving RIR's policy. The earlier proposal generally relied on mutual agreement, with a conditional plan where a needs-based region was involved.
حقائق موثقة −
This policy is based on no need basis. However, if a transfer happens between AFRINIC and a region where needs basis is imposed, a plan must be submitted to AFRINIC which includes a brief illustration of the use of 50% of the transferred resources in the coming 10 years.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
A transfer from AFRINIC to another RIR must follow the policy of the receiving RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
Treatment of legacy status · Draft 1 proposes deleting the clause that strips transferred IPv4 resources of legacy status. Draft 2 instead retains that clause in its proposed column. This is a change between proposed drafts, not a claim about any completed transfer.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. This paragraph will be removed.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferحقائق موثقة ↗
RIR handling of a transfer request · Draft 2 directs the source's request to the receiving RIR and refers to that RIR's policies. Draft 1 instead routes the request to the RIR where the resources are registered and refers to that transferring RIR's policies.
حقائق موثقة −
If the two parties agree, the transferring party will send a request to the RIR with which the resources are registered, using a standard template and submit an official agreement of resource transfer to the involved RIR(s). The transfer shall be in compliance with the policies of the transferring RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
If the two parties agree, the transferring party will send a request to the receiving RIR, using a standard template and submit an official agreement of resource transfer to the involved RIR(s). The transfer shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
Staff assessment of ASN coverage · Draft 2 includes a staff warning that ASN transfers are mentioned in the summary but the operative clauses refer only to IPv4. The summary's reference to AS numbers already appears in Draft 1, so this assessment is not evidence of newly added operative ASN rules.
حقائق موثقة −
This proposal outlines a model in which AFRINIC can freely transfer number resources to/from other regions, i.e. RIPE NCC, APNIC, ARIN and LACNIC. This includes both IPv4 addresses and AS numbers.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
ASN transfer is mentioned only in the summary of the problem but all text in the policy clauses refers to IPv4 only, this is confusing and will lead to misinterpretation. It is important to have ASN inclusion clearly stated in the policy textحقائق موثقة ↗
Notification after transfer review · Draft 2 makes the receiving RIR notify the transferring RIR and parties after approval. Draft 1 makes the transferring RIR notify the receiving RIR and parties after deciding the request can proceed.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.5.2 After the transferring RIR has reviewed the application and deemed that it is appropriate to proceed with the transfer, it shall notify the receiving RIR, the transferring party and the recipient.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.5.2 After the receiving RIR approves the transfer, it will notify the transferring RIR, the transferring party and the recipient. The resources will be transferred to the recipient.حقائق موثقة ↗
Disputed resources · Draft 3 restores an explicit prohibition on the source being involved in a dispute about the resources' status, alongside the receiving-RIR compliance requirement. Draft 2's proposed clause omits the explicit dispute restriction.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR, and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.حقائق موثقة ↗
Further AFRINIC allocations after a transfer · Draft 3 bars a transfer source from further AFRINIC allocations or assignments for 12 months after approval. Draft 2 instead permits further resources subject to current policy. The unchanged current-policy column must not be mistaken for the earlier proposed condition.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.3.2 Source entities are eligible to receive further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC as long as it complies with current policy.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after a transfer is approved.حقائق موثقة ↗
Preservation of legacy status · Draft 3 changes the proposed clause so transferred legacy resources retain legacy status. Draft 2's proposed clause removes that status. The comparison does not itself determine the consequences for membership, registration or need assessment.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferحقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.3 Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferحقائق موثقة ↗
ARIN compatibility feedback · Draft 3's assessment records ARIN's negative compatibility response concerning the requirement on a source to comply with the receiving RIR's policies. Draft 2 already raised this as a staff clarification issue. This is historical feedback on that draft, not a present-day compatibility finding.
حقائق موثقة −
The source entity has no relationship with the receiving RIR. Can the authors clarify as to what they exactly mean here?حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
ARIN has responded that the Resource Transfer Policy is not compatible with their inter-RIR transfer policies because of the following statement thereinحقائق موثقة ↗
RIPE NCC process feedback · Draft 3's assessment adds RIPE NCC feedback that section 5.7.5 conflicts with its policies and procedures and cannot be implemented as written. Draft 2 had already requested clarification on the proposed standard template. This records historical feedback, not a newly enacted procedure.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.5.1 speaks of using a standard template. Clarification is needed on this standard template - Is it a globally accepted standard template across all regions?حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
RIPE NCC Section 5.7.5 makes the policy not compatible with the RIPE policies and procedures and not possible to implement.حقائق موثقة ↗
Conflicting captured submission dates · The Draft 3 page still gives 2020-08-13 in its details, while its revision history dates Version 3 to 21 September 2020. Draft 2's details and version history use August. The source conflict is retained; the comparison does not invent a corrected submission date.
حقائق موثقة +
21 Sept 2020 Version 3: AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03 - Section 5.7.3.2, and 5.7.4.3, have been updated.حقائق موثقة ↗
APNIC compatibility feedback · Draft 3's staff assessment records APNIC's negative compatibility response, particularly about applying the receiving RIR's policies to the source. Draft 2 had raised the underlying jurisdiction question without this reported APNIC response.
حقائق موثقة −
The source entity has no relationship with the receiving RIR. Can the authors clarify as to what they exactly mean here?حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
APNIC The APNIC inter-RIR policy is not compatible with the current text, especially “ The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR. ”حقائق موثقة ↗
LACNIC feedback on the proposed procedure · Draft 3 records LACNIC's objection that the receiving-RIR-first request and notification procedure differs from how inter-RIR transfers were established. This is captured feedback, distinct from the proposal's own procedure and any later implementation.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.5.2 After the receiving RIR approves the transfer, it will notify the transferring RIR, the transferring party and the recipient. The resources will be transferred to the recipient.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
Paragraph 5.7.5 "Procedure of the resource transfer” states that the transferring party will submit a transfer request to the receiving RIR (Not the offering) and the receiving RIR will notify the transferring RIR once it approves the transfer". This is not in line with how INTER-RIR transfers were set up in any of the other RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
Eligible resource holdings · Draft 4 replaces the proposed description of any holder posting a request and supplying an agreement with resources held in an AFRINIC or other RIR member account, or by a legacy holder. This changes the eligibility wording; other applicable requirements are not inferred away.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.2 IPv4 resources to be transferred – any resource holder who posts a transfer request to another party. An agreement of resource transfer shall be provided.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.2 IPv4 resources to be transferred - must be from an existing AFRINIC or any RIR member's account or from a Legacy Resource Holder.حقائق موثقة ↗
Source jurisdiction requirement · Draft 4 removes the proposed requirement that the source comply with the receiving RIR's policies, while retaining rightful-holder and no-dispute conditions. This is a textual change, not proof that the earlier cross-RIR objections were all resolved.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR, and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.3.1 The source must be the current and rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall not be involved in any disputes as to those resources' status.حقائق موثقة ↗
Holding period before retransfer · Draft 4 adds a 12-month prohibition on retransferring an incoming transferred resource. It retains the separate 12-month restriction on a source receiving new AFRINIC allocations or assignments.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for 12 months period after a transfer is approved.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.3.2 Source entities are not eligible to receive any further IPv4 allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for a period of twelve (12) months after a transfer is approved. An incoming transferred resource cannot be transferred again for a period of twelve (12) months.حقائق موثقة ↗
Applicable policies for outgoing transfers · Draft 4 changes the outgoing-transfer clause from the receiving RIR's policy to the relevant policies. The new phrase is broader but does not enumerate which policies apply.
حقائق موثقة −
A transfer from AFRINIC to another RIR must follow the policy of the receiving RIR.حقائق موثقة ↗
Recipient eligibility · Draft 4 replaces any mutually agreeing recipient with an AFRINIC or other RIR member, or a legacy holder in any region. The needs-based clause for transfers into AFRINIC remains.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.4.2 The recipient can be any party who reaches an agreement of resource transfer with the sender.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.2 The recipient must be an AFRINIC or any RIR member, legacy holders in any regionحقائق موثقة ↗
Scope of legacy-status preservation · Draft 4 limits its express preservation of legacy status to incoming transferred legacy resources, whereas Draft 3 says transferred legacy resources generally. The comparison does not invent a status rule for outgoing transfers.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.4.3 Transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transferحقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.3 Incoming transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 4. Referencesحقائق موثقة ↗
Detailed transfer procedure removed · Draft 4 omits the proposed 5.7.5 procedure, including the source's direct request to the receiving RIR and that RIR's notification steps. Its operative text ends after 5.7.4.3. This removes the draft's directions; it does not establish a replacement procedure.
حقائق موثقة −
5.7.5 Procedure of the resource transfer 5.7.5.1 The transferring party who holds the resources can initiate a transfer request between itself and an external party.حقائق موثقة ↗
حقائق موثقة +
5.7.4.3 Incoming transferred legacy resources will still be regarded as legacy resources. 4. Referencesحقائق موثقة ↗
No updated assessment established · Draft 3 includes a dated staff assessment and compatibility feedback. The retained Draft 4 page only says an assessment is to be updated. That placeholder is not evidence that the earlier concerns were resolved or that the revised proposal was approved.
حقائق موثقة −
AFRINIC Staff Assessment Date of Assessment Relevant to Proposal 13 Oct 2020 AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03حقائق موثقة ↗
الخط الزمني للنقاش
الكيانات
تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
المصادر والتغطية
المصادر الرسمية
أرشيفات المناقشات العامة
- afrinic-rpd
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 04/08/2004
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 25/08/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 13,116
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- www.afrinic.net
- afrinic-africann
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 03/08/2026
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 02/10/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 2,559
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-afripv6-discuss
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 17/08/2015
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 18/09/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 2,538
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-announce
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 18/08/2015
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 18/09/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 2,497
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-community-discuss
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 11/09/2015
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 29/12/2019
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 3,127
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-dbwg
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 04/08/2026
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 06/10/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 907
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-dnssec-ops
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 18/08/2015
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 01/12/2016
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 307
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-icp2-review
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 10/04/2025
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 10/11/2025
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 0
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-measurement-wg
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 01/02/2018
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 22/11/2024
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 138
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-mira
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 17/11/2020
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 22/11/2024
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 0
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-ois-wg
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 09/09/2021
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 22/11/2024
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 0
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
- afrinic-rpki-discuss
- أقدم مادة محفوظة
- 15/01/2016
- أحدث مادة محفوظة
- 23/04/2026
- آخر تحديث
- 12/10/2026
- التغطية
- تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة.
- جارٍ التحميل
- 154
- الفجوات المعروفة
- 0
التغطية
جزئية
أقدم مادة محفوظة: 04/08/2004
أحدث مادة محفوظة: 12/10/2026
حداثة البيانات
الفجوات المعروفة
- www.afrinic.net: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- www.afrinic.net: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-rpd: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- www.afrinic.net: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-africann: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-afripv6-discuss: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-announce: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-community-discuss: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-dbwg: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-dnssec-ops: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-measurement-wg: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
- afrinic-rpki-discuss: تغطية المصدر غير مكتملة. · لم يتم الوصول إلى حدود المصدر بعد.
