- X, formerly Twitter, agrees to temporarily stop using EU user data for AI training.
- The decision follows legal action by Ireland’s Data Protection Commission.
OUR TAKE
The case underscores the intensifying clash between tech companies and European regulators over data privacy, reflecting the challenges of balancing innovation with stringent regulatory standards. This ongoing conflict could have significant implications for the future of AI development in the region, potentially leading to stricter regulations and a more cautious approach by tech companies operating within the EU.
-Lilith Chen, BTW reporter
What happened
X, the social media platform previously known as Twitter, has agreed to temporarily halt the use of personal data from European Union (EU) users in training its AI systems. This decision follows legal action initiated by Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), which sought to suspend X’s data processing activities over concerns related to user privacy. The DPC highlighted that X began using EU user data for AI training on May 7, 2024, but failed to provide users with an opt-out option until July 16—more than two months later. Compounding the issue, the opt-out feature was not rolled out to all users simultaneously, raising further concerns about compliance with EU privacy regulations. In response, X has agreed to refrain from using any data collected between May 7 and August 1 until the ongoing legal proceedings are settled. The company is required to submit its opposition to the DPC’s suspension order by September 4, 2024.
Also read: Musk faces lawsuit over delayed disclosure of Twitter stake
Also read: Former Twitter, Tesla engineers launch Particle, an AI news reader
Why it’s important
This legal battle is significant as it highlights the escalating tension between tech companies and European regulators over data privacy, particularly in AI development. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the world’s most stringent privacy laws, and the outcome of this case could set a crucial precedent for how AI systems are trained using data from EU citizens. A ruling against X could result in stricter oversight and more stringent regulations on AI development within the EU, potentially hindering innovation. Furthermore, the case could have broader implications, compelling other tech giants like Meta and Google, which have faced similar scrutiny, to reevaluate and potentially alter their data processing practices to ensure they align with EU laws. The decision in this case could thus shape the future of AI development and data privacy standards in Europe and beyond.
