変更点
確認できる変化は、政策提案2024-02が2024年10月14日に「introduced」として記録されたことだけである。導入後の改訂、採択、拒否、撤回、延期、失効または実施は、提示された事実から確認できない。
RIPE NCC · RIR ウォッチ
提案ごとの記録はここから確認できます。何が変わり、なぜ重要だったのか、誰が何を主張し、立場がどう変化し、何が決定され、どの点で証拠がなお不足しているのかを追えます。
出典に基づく事実
実際に議論を方向づけたのは誰か?
BTW 分析
確認できる変化は、政策提案2024-02が2024年10月14日に「introduced」として記録されたことだけである。導入後の改訂、採択、拒否、撤回、延期、失効または実施は、提示された事実から確認できない。
討議メッセージ、参加者の立場、政策案の具体的内容が提示されていないため、論争の実質的な争点、利害対立、支持・反対の根拠は特定できない。収録データ内では観測可能な討議そのものが存在しない。
「introduced」は提案開始を示すにとどまり、最終決定ではない。収録された討議はメッセージ0件、討議参加者0人、活動日0日であり、採択その他の決定記録もないため、討議と決定結果の関係は評価できない。
上位参加者シェア、HHI、実効参加者数、50%・80%コア人数がすべて0であるのは、メッセージが0件だからであり、参加が広く分散していたことを意味しない。形式上の主体2者は記録されているが、討議参加者は0人であり、その身元、役割、影響力は不明である。
政策過程上の実質的なチョークポイントは特定できない。確認できるのが導入記録だけで、後続のレビュー、合意判定、意思決定主体および最終処理が欠けているためである。分析上の最大の制約は、導入後の経過、討議、立場および決定記録が提示されていない点にある。
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Initial allocation size LIRs that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to receive an initial allocation of /32 or /28 without needing to supply any additional information.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Initial allocation size LIRs that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to receive an initial allocation of /32 up to /28 without needing to supply any additional information.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Existing IPv6 address space holders LIRs that hold one or more IPv6 allocations that were originally issued directly by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix may request an extension of each such allocation up to a /28 without the need for additional documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Existing IPv6 address space holders Organizations, not LIRs, that hold one or more IPv6 allocations that were originally issued directly by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix may request once an extension of one of such allocation up to a /28 without the need for additional documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Allowing extensions only for allocations originally issued as a single prefix avoids the risk of abuse by infinitely extending chunks resulting from partial IPv6 transfers. RIPE NCC confirmed that there are 22,682 IPv6 allocations.出典に基づく事実 ↗
The proposal allows only one extension per organization, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stockpiling.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Arguments Opposing the Proposal This policy proposal is perceived as counterproductive to conservation efforts.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
This is by simplifying the way LIRs can obtain IPv6 address space suitable for their networks’ operational requirements. The proposal originates from the opinions expressed by members of the RIPE community in the Address Policy Working Group during presentations [1], interim sessions [2] and a call with the WG Co-Chairs on this topic.出典に基づく事実 ↗
This is by simplifying the way LIRs can obtain IPv6 address space suitable for their networks’ operational requirements.The proposal originates from the opinions expressed by members of the RIPE community in the Address Policy Working Group during presentations [1], interim sessions [2] and a call with the WG Co-Chairs on this topic.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Existing IPv6 address space holders Organizations, not LIRs, that hold one or more IPv6 allocations that were originally issued directly by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix may request once an extension of one of such allocation up to a /28 without the need for additional documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Existing IPv6 address space holders A Member, that holds one or more IPv6 allocations originally issued directly to them by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix, may request an extension of one of these allocations up to a /28 without the need for additional documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
The proposal allows only one extension per organization, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stockpiling.出典に基づく事実 ↗
The proposal allows only one extension per Member, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stockpiling.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
This is by simplifying the way LIRs can obtain IPv6 address space suitable for their networks’ operational requirements.The proposal originates from the opinions expressed by members of the RIPE community in the Address Policy Working Group during presentations [1], interim sessions [2] and a call with the WG Co-Chairs on this topic.出典に基づく事実 ↗
This is by simplifying the way LIRs can obtain IPv6 address space suitable for their networks’ operational requirements. The proposal originates from the opinions expressed by members of the RIPE community in the Address Policy Working Group during presentations [1], interim sessions [2] and a call with the WG Co-Chairs on this topic.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Existing IPv6 address space holders A Member, that holds one or more IPv6 allocations originally issued directly to them by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix, may request an extension of one of these allocations up to a /28 without the need for additional documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Existing IPv6 address space holders LIRs that hold one or more IPv6 allocations originally issued directly by the RIPE NCC as a single prefix can request an extension of one of these allocations up to a /28 without providing further documentation.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
The proposal allows only one extension per Member, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stockpiling.出典に基づく事実 ↗
The proposal allows only one extension per LIR without further justification, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stock-pilers.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
The proposal allows only one extension per Member, which limits some of the potential adverse effects of stockpiling.出典に基づく事実 ↗
It also addresses the RIPE NCC Executive Board’s concerns in the previous impact analysis about using “Members” instead of “LIRs”.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Policy text · Astra identified a substantive wording change in this retained policy section.
Sixty-eight of them already have /28 or shorter prefixes (so 22,614 of them are /29-/32).出典に基づく事実 ↗
68 of them already have /28 or shorter prefixes (so 22,614 of them are /29 - /32).出典に基づく事実 ↗
直近の調査試行: 2026/09/19
本人確認済み: 2026/09/19
Draft Authors Jordi Palet Martinez [The IPv6 Company] Rinse Kloekwww.ripe.net
確認済みの公開プロフィール
最初の明示的立場: 不明 → 最新の明示的立場: 不明 · 立場の変化: 0
見解の一貫性: 明示的な立場は示されていません
author
出典に基づく事実 ↗ポリシーメッセージ総数: 0
一部
最初の収録: 1992/06/30
最新の収録: 2026/10/15