変更点
検証済みの政策年表が空であり、初期案、改訂、採択、撤回、延期または失効の記録もないため、政策上何が変更されたかは判定できない。
RIPE NCC · RIR ウォッチ
提案ごとの記録はここから確認できます。何が変わり、なぜ重要だったのか、誰が何を主張し、立場がどう変化し、何が決定され、どの点で証拠がなお不足しているのかを追えます。
出典に基づく事実
実際に議論を方向づけたのは誰か?
BTW 分析
検証済みの政策年表が空であり、初期案、改訂、採択、撤回、延期または失効の記録もないため、政策上何が変更されたかは判定できない。
討議メッセージ、参加者の立場、未解決または少数派の主張がいずれも収録されていないため、論争の実質的争点は特定できない。
記録上の討議メッセージ数、討議参加者数、公式アクター数、活動日数はすべて0であり、正式な決定記録も供給されていない。したがって、討議上の優勢と制度上の決定結果を区別または関連付けることはできず、最終結果も未判定である。
top1、top5、top10の発言比率とHHIはすべて0だが、メッセージ数と参加者数も0であるため、これは参加が均等に分散していたことを意味しない。実効参加者数、core_50、core_80、単発参加者数、反復参加者数も0であり、参加集中度および中心層・周辺層の構造は評価不能である。
政策過程の段階、議題設定者、修正主導者、コンセンサス判定者または最終決定者を示す事実がないため、制度上または人的なチョークポイントは特定できない。現時点の分析上の制約は、政策年表、討議内容、立場推移および決定記録が供給されていないことであるが、これを実際の政策過程におけるチョークポイントと同一視することはできない。
Public complaint transparency · Version 2.0 replaces the public list of individual reports with aggregate statistics: running totals for new and under-investigation reports and counts of closed reports by outcome. The earlier list would have exposed submission dates, resources and current state, plus content and reporter identity if the reporter consented. The revised section does not carry forward the individual website/FTP report-list requirement.
The existence of all such reports shall be made public. The submitter of the report will choose whether or not the contents of the report and the submitter's own identity is to bemade public. The published list of reports shall at least include: Date submitted; The resources the report is about; A reference to the report content, if the submitter indicated that it can be made public; The identity of the submitter, if the submitter indicated that it can be made public; The current state.出典に基づく事実 ↗
The RIPE NCC will handle all such reports and publish statistics about such reports publicly. The RIPE NCC will publish regularly statistics of the reports that have been received but not yet closed. These statistics will show the number of reports in each of the following categories: 'new': Submitted but not being investigated yet 'under-investigation': The RIPE NCC is investigating the report出典に基づく事実 ↗
Private investigation progress · A new section gives both the reporter and the organisations mentioned in a report a way to follow the investigation, explicitly keeping this information non-public. This accompanies removal of the earlier public per-report state list.
The published list of reports shall at least include: Date submitted; The resources the report is about; A reference to the report content, if the submitter indicated that it can be made public; The identity of the submitter, if the submitter indicated that it can be made public; The current state.出典に基づく事実 ↗
2. Progress The RIPE NCC will provide a way to follow the progress of the investigation for both the person submitting a report and the organization(s) mentioned in the report. This information will not be published publicly.出典に基づく事実 ↗
Historical reports · Version 1.0 expressly excluded reports made before policy adoption from publication. The aggregate-statistics replacement omits that sentence. The revised text does not itself establish a historical reporting start date or expressly require retrospective publication, so neither is inferred from the omission.
The RIPE NCC will publish regularly statistics of the reports that have been received but not yet closed. These statistics will show the number of reports in each of the following categories: 'new': Submitted but not being investigated yet 'under-investigation': The RIPE NCC is investigating the report出典に基づく事実 ↗
Stated tradeoff and attribution · The opposing rationale changes from the risk of false complaints damaging organisations' reputations to the concern that the proposal imposes procedures better decided by the RIPE NCC. The revised document also adds an attribution section naming Sander Steffann and Shane Kerr as active contributors. The returned-resource ledger remains in the proposal.
It is possible that someone maysubmit false complaints in order to damage the good name of other organisations. The proposers think that providing transparency will make such abuse of the reporting system less likely and if it should occur easier to identify.出典に基づく事実 ↗
b. Arguments opposing the proposal Such a policy as this forces a procedure on the RIPE NCC which is better left decided by the RIPE NCC. The proposers have tried to keep the policy as flexible as possible, while still providing transparency.出典に基づく事実 ↗
一部
最初の収録: 1992/06/30
最新の収録: 2026/10/12